|
Originally Posted by jared8783
(Post 839043)
my concern is which people or charities i would like to help
how i would like to help and why i would like to help one thing is for sure i dont want to help a charity that simply has a sign up sheet i want to help a charity that helps people reach the point where they can stand on their own two feet goodwill does job training and they provide low cost items particularly clothing to people who can't hardly afford new clothes its a nice charity if you ask me i like goodwill Hate to break it to you bro, but that charity isn't such a great choice. |
I worked for the largest non-profit in the US. what now?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 839041)
Fooger, I believe he posted in SUPPORT of climate change, not against it if you read his sources. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1330039536 |
Originally Posted by jared8783
(Post 839043)
one thing is for sure
i dont want to help a charity that simply has a sign up sheet i want to help a charity that helps people reach the point where they can stand on their own two feet And, yes, there are people who use them in that manner. I can speak from personal experience. The problem I think most people have - and I think most conservative or libertarian leaning people tend to stereotype - is those that make foodstamps and social welfare a permanent part of their budget. Like with many of the things some of us rail against, it is not the system but the unpunished abuses. |
Originally Posted by fooger03
(Post 839060)
In truth, not really. The Little Ice Age remains for the present the subject of speculation. The most likely influence during this period is variable output from the sun combined with pronounced volcanic activity. We know that from the end of the LIA to the 1950s the sun’s output increased. But since WW2 the sun has slowly grown quieter, yet the temperature on Earth has gone up. The sceptical argument that current warming is a continuation of the same warming that ended the LIA is unlikely. There is a lack of evidence for a suitable forcing (e.g. the sun) and numerous correlations with known natural forcings that can account for the LIA itself, and the subsequent climate recovery. Taken in isolation, the LIA might cast doubt on the theory of climate change. Considered alongside the empirical evidence, model predictions and a century of scientific research into the climate, recovery from the LIA is not a plausible theory to explain the observed evidence and rate of global climate change. (Edit) Oh ----, I'm LMAOing. I confused Foogy for Jared. |
|
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...-diamond/4575/
It's interesting to see how De Beers pioneered modern political discourse and campaigning. |
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/02...-calls-traced/
Can any Canadians shed light on what this means in US terms? |
1 Attachment(s)
|
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
I see Santorum's finally giving in to his latent homosexuality!
|
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/02/...-court-ruling/
:drama: Good for us, bad for the gov't. Whoda thunk? P.S. Santorum claims we have no such rights as noted in the above article. |
You guys ever look up what the slang term "santorum" is?
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 839924)
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/02/...-court-ruling/
:drama: Good for us, bad for the gov't. Whoda thunk? P.S. Santorum claims we have no such rights as noted in the above article. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 839929)
You guys ever look up what the slang term "santorum" is?
You're welcome |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 839929)
You guys ever look up what the slang term "santorum" is?
Originally Posted by Alameda
(Post 839937)
|
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...-excerpt_x.htm
Oh this is absolutely hilarious. Santorum blames the Catholic Church's pedophilia problem on liberalism. And our right to privacy. |
yeah the dude is nuts. I dont even know why he ran for pres. or how he's come so far.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands