When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
(Marjorie Taylor Greene saying that women were created by god, by removing a rib from a man's chest and culturing it into a living organism, as compared to how god created literally every other thing from scratch by saying "let there by X.")
Honestly, this is the sort of "truth" which I typically only expect to encounter when visiting the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky. It is not, broadly speaking, something which I expect to hear from members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
The fact that we have politicians saying things like that is no less scary, to me, than the fact that we have other politicians using such speech as fodder for their "... and that's why you're wrong about how people with more than zero penises can be women" crusade, even though the two false ideologies are not related.
replace one fantasy for another. however, one is fantasy world intended to purposefully harm minors for sexual gratification under the guise of science.
replace one fantasy for another. however, one is fantasy world intended to purposefully harm minors for sexual gratification under the guise of science.
Yes, and the other is about women with penises.
I fail to see the relevance.
But, in all seriousness, is Allie Beth Stuckey being serious when she says that the pastor of your church is upholding "Groomer Supremacy" if he (note: women cannot be church pastors) is not teaching "anti-Grooming sermons."
And why would a Christian pastor be opposed to selling young girls as sex slaves? That would specifically contradict what the Bible teaches (Exodus 21:7)
(Free money if you claim to have the wrong number of penises.)
No, back up.
We need to address this Allie Beth Stuckey thing. I realize that she's blonde and skinny and a Trump-apologist and otherwise tickles your pickle in all the right ways, but for one, she's married, and for two, you gotta stop and actually listen to what this lady is saying.
It's more than just "pedos bad, Fox good."
She says: "I recommend a government division, The Anti-Grooming Task Force, in which unelected anti-grooming activists determine whether institutions are sufficiently anti-grooming."
Dafuq? At least when Senator McCarthy put together his witch-hunting task force in the 1950s, they were accountable to the Congress, and thus, the voters.
What does it even mean to be "anti-grooming?" Is it enough that I have a bumper sticker on my car which espouses physical violence against pedophiles, or do I need to go door to door spreading the gospel?
What is "groomer supremacy?" Is it like white supremacy, where you get preferential treatment by the police and mortgage lenders? Or is it the "tying black people to the bumper of your pickup truck by their feet and then dragging them around until they die" kind of supremacy?
What color hooded robes do the groomer-supremacists wear to their meetings inside a small church in the mountains of northern Idaho?
This lady wants the government to organize and sanction hit-squads consisting of activists to determine whether institutions are sufficiently doing a thing which she (and the activists) completely made up and therefore get to define.
Gee, I wonder if "anti-grooming activists" are going to determine that literally everyone who they don't like isn't doing a good job of being an anti-groomer.
Then: "Those who defend themselves against accusations of grooming are simply expressing Groomer Fragility."
So, if a person who has been accused of being a witch by the aforementioned witch-hunting council says "I am not a witch," then by her reasoning, that is proof that they are a witch?
Is she at some point going to suggest that Groomers must weigh the same as a duck, because they are made of wood?
"Unless you are actively working to dismantle the systems of grooming, you are upholding the institutions that have oppressed children for centuries."
This woman is reading from the same hymnal as the critical-race-theorists with their "you have to be actively anti-racist" gospel. Hell, she's literally using the same words and phrases.
This is honestly some of the most un-American **** I have ever seen you repeat.
Joe, I fear that too much exposure to Scott’s posting has screwed with the calibration of your satire meter.
That was a practically-verbatim woke screed with groomers substituted for the usual far-left bogeymen.
Joe, I fear that too much exposure to Scott’s posting has screwed with the calibration of your satire meter.
That was a practically-verbatim woke screed with groomers substituted for the usual far-left bogeymen.
I'm not fully convinced of this.
Braineack is way too addicted to pedophile-bashing to be bashing a pedophile-basher.
Have a look around Allie Beth Stuckey's Twitter thread. Roughly 50% of it is her ranting about trans-, abortion-, and pedo-related topics. Disney employees, gay teachers, Mitt Romney, etc.
Her posts were meant to be comical; she took direct language/logic from leftist anti-racists and just changed it to anti-groomer. One of the biggest strengths of the right is pointing out the hypocrisy of the left and then doing nothing about it.
Molly Lewis sort of wrote a song about this. It's entitled "An Open Letter to Stephen Fry," and consists entirely of Lewis attempting to convince Fry (who is gay) to impregnate her.
Believe it or not, null-gender is actually starting to become a thing in gender-confirmation surgery.
For males, it typically involves the removal of the ***** & testes without the construction of a vaginal canal or the preservation of the glans. The end result is a complete absence of sexual function or stimulation.
For females, it involves the removal of the breasts without preservation of the nipple, and often the removal of the external labia. A hysterectomy (removal of the uterus, ovaries, and cervix) may also be performed. The clitoris may be retained if desired.
One example would be this young lady who, judging by all of the topless photos she has posted, seems to be very proud of showing off her absence of breasts in public to demonstrate to the world just how much she loathes her natural body:
^^ You can tell that was some high end plastic surgery there, judging from those ragged scars. I'm sure all the best docs line up to take a crack at disfiguring a person's body like that.
As far as believing it or not, I will choose to NOT, explaining any deviation as just statistical noise. Except for the unfortunate few who were born with some hermaphroditic anomaly, and thus could actually benefit from surgery, the whole lot of them are sick in the head as far as I'm concerned.
04-06-2022, 12:50 PM
0
