Michele Bachmann promises $2 gas!
#61
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,052
Total Cats: 6,615
Yes, higher energy prices will force people to be more energy-conscious, and more money will go into R&D on "green" energy sources. People will buy "cleaner" cars, and traffic congestion will decrease slightly. We know all of this as a matter of historical precedent.
It will also harm "the economy" as a whole. More money will flow out of the US to oil-producing nations, sales of domestically-produced automobiles will decline relative to sales of Asian automobiles (though, in fairness, the Volt may change things this time around), and don't forget that much of that money spent on "green energy" comes from taxes and deficit spending, that money could otherwise have been spent on consumer goods, food and trackdays. And while a lot of R&D on "green" energy happens in the US, that's a trivial sum of money compared to actually manufacturing all of the so-called "green" products (solar cells, lithium batteries, etc), and 0% of that takes place within the US, so that's yet more money flowing out of the country.
None of this is theory or speculation. All of this has happened before.
#62
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Originally Posted by Stein
Of course, if the oil prices were lower, the same families would take the extra money and go to walmart to spend it so that money could...go....overs... oh, never mind.
#65
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,052
Total Cats: 6,615
I don't know if 100% of our imports from Canada and Mexico travel via pipeline, or if overseas shipments are used to service some fields in those countries. If we assume imports from those two countries are exclusively by pipeline and no shipping is involved, then "overseas" imports (those from Asia, Africa, South America and Europe) account for slightly over 63% of total imports.
Domestic production of crude oil in the US is presently around 5.5m barrels / day, which accounts for slightly more than 1/3 of total US crude oil consumption.
#66
Well, the US economy runs on New car sales, New & existing home sales, and other consumer spending. Unemployment is running at a conservative 9% (with actual unemployment possibly edging 20%). Foreclosures are not ebbing. Call a local bankruptcy attorney to find out how busy they are.
So yes, US Consumers must buy things to keep the economy rolling. If one could assume that most US consumers are buying things without cash (i.e., they don't have the cash, but think they can just buy on a credit card), then US consumers must buy those plasma screen TV's, Vinyl windows, and new cars with credit.
The government doesn't create jobs, but they sure do have the ability to negatively impact how employers spend their money. Increasing taxes on "the wealthy" also does what? Help those with money find ways to hold onto their money instead of injecting it into the economy.
So yes, US Consumers must buy things to keep the economy rolling. If one could assume that most US consumers are buying things without cash (i.e., they don't have the cash, but think they can just buy on a credit card), then US consumers must buy those plasma screen TV's, Vinyl windows, and new cars with credit.
The government doesn't create jobs, but they sure do have the ability to negatively impact how employers spend their money. Increasing taxes on "the wealthy" also does what? Help those with money find ways to hold onto their money instead of injecting it into the economy.
#67
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,079
timely, just read something that mirrored that today:
It wasn’t until Mr. Buffett turned 75 that he turned his attention to charity, saying that he was better off spending his time allocating capital at Berkshire Hathaway — where he believed he could create even greater wealth to give away — than he would ever be at devoting his energies toward running a foundation.
[L]ast year, Carlos Slim Helú, the Mexican telecommunications billionaire, defended his lack of charity and his refusal to sign the Giving Pledge. “What we need to do as businessmen is to help to solve the problems, the social problems,” he said in an interview on CNBC. “To fight poverty, but not by charity.”
Do we want highly talented entrepreneurs and investors dropping out of the private sector and giving their money away after they’ve reached a certain point, say $5 billion. Or do we want them to focus on creating more wealth and prosperity?
#68
It will also harm "the economy" as a whole. More money will flow out of the US to oil-producing nations, sales of domestically-produced automobiles will decline relative to sales of Asian automobiles (though, in fairness, the Volt may change things this time around), and don't forget that much of that money spent on "green energy" comes from taxes and deficit spending, that money could otherwise have been spent on consumer goods, food and trackdays. And while a lot of R&D on "green" energy happens in the US, that's a trivial sum of money compared to actually manufacturing all of the so-called "green" products (solar cells, lithium batteries, etc), and 0% of that takes place within the US, so that's yet more money flowing out of the country.
None of this is theory or speculation. All of this has happened before.
None of this is theory or speculation. All of this has happened before.
Once US auto makers produce excellent products they will earn more sales.
Although, I do think that when oil or fuel prices increase, that only makes it more expensive or more difficult for overseas production to be competitive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post