New mustang: even more slab-sided and small-windowed
1 Attachment(s)
Will that trend reverse already? Not that I'm a fan of the car, but ugh.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1386343182 |
I don't like.
I do like the '10 to current...I'd own 1. I'm still not a fan of OHC in a V8 though... |
I think it's an improvement.
|
Greenhouse/roofline looks like Accord Coupe.
|
So far, I like it.
|
Originally Posted by thirdgen
(Post 1080154)
I don't like.
I do like the '10 to current...I'd own 1. I'm still not a fan of OHC in a V8 though... Yeah, i don't like progress and clear technology improvements, either. |
1 Attachment(s)
I hate to say it but the rear quarter/trunk reminds me of one of those terrible Monte Carlos. Overall I like it though.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1386345016 |
300hp turbo 4 cylinder.
Ford dissects the heart of the 2015 Mustang, its engine range - Autoblog Yes please. Big up's to Ford, i've been seeing a ton of these driving around in camo. My dad says he has one where he works, in Dearborn... Getting an "upgrade". |
I figured they were trying to make it look more like a BRZ/Genesis to compete.
I generally like the design, but I HATE the rear. It's got a really ugly ass. Finally a decent interior however. Will that trend reverse already? |
-400 lbs, 400+hp, IRS. I like it. Looks are pretty good too, though I agree the rear end kills it.
|
I like it. Unlike the Camaro, which looks squashed.
Glass is heavy. So, smaller windows means lighter. Also, smaller openings is better from the structural engineering point of view. Add to the fact that glass is not getting much cheaper. The only way to cut cost is by using smaller panels. Remember, cutting $.50 per car is a huge savings to car companies. That can pay the salary of an engineer to further cut costs. |
Its whatever. I didnt by my '11 Mustang because of what it looks like.
Im interested in the 4 cylinder turbo version of the '15. If the price is right I would trade in my 5.0 for the boost. EDIT: Finally, the transmissions have received some attention, with the six-speed manual from Getrag getting a new shift linkage, which should provide a shorter, crisper action. |
Originally Posted by Fireindc
(Post 1080200)
-400 lbs, 400+hp, IRS. I like it. Looks are pretty good too, though I agree the rear end kills it.
|
Originally Posted by Chilicharger665
(Post 1080370)
It is gaining weight, not losing it. It is a disappointment in every way to me.
I hadn't noticed the slab-sidedness before but I don't think it's near as bad as the Camaro or challenger. Still prefer the glass-to-body ratio of the current gen though, but everything else on the new car is better. I'd drive it. Give me the V8 though, I don't want the turbo-4. It'll claim high MPG and get low MPG. |
2 Attachment(s)
|
I might not love the styling of the rear of the 'Vette but what an awesome car. Really. Just incredible. Do want.
|
Originally Posted by turbofan
(Post 1080380)
Rumored to be in the neighborhood of 3300 pounds. It has lost significant weight from previous generations according to that. Not 400 pounds, but still significant. We will see what it ACTUALLY weighs.
G. I still think it is ridiculously ugly, so whatever. |
everywhere I read says it will lose weight.
|
^yup
|
Originally Posted by RedCarmel
(Post 1080161)
I hate to say it but the rear quarter/trunk reminds me of one of those terrible Monte Carlos. Overall I like it though.
I would say it looks more like the '69 mustang rear end coupled with the existing. saying that im looking at the rear 1/4 window and rear 1/4. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands