New mustang: even more slab-sided and small-windowed - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to Miataturbo.net   Members
 


Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2013, 11:19 AM   #1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,454
Total Cats: 80
Default New mustang: even more slab-sided and small-windowed

Will that trend reverse already? Not that I'm a fan of the car, but ugh.

Attached Thumbnails
New mustang:  even more slab-sided and small-windowed-1205_ford-mustang-624x381.jpg  
JasonC SBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:35 AM   #2
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,806
Total Cats: 183
Default

I don't like.
I do like the '10 to current...I'd own 1. I'm still not a fan of OHC in a V8 though...
thirdgen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:36 AM   #3
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Meeners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 194
Total Cats: 0
Default

I think it's an improvement.
Meeners is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:37 AM   #4
Crumple Zone Tester
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,656
Total Cats: 447
Default

Greenhouse/roofline looks like Accord Coupe.
mgeoffriau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:37 AM   #5
Murderator
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 36,185
Total Cats: 2,582
Default

So far, I like it.
18psi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:46 AM   #6
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,465
Total Cats: 782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdgen View Post
I don't like.
I do like the '10 to current...I'd own 1. I'm still not a fan of OHC in a V8 though...

Yeah, i don't like progress and clear technology improvements, either.
concealer404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:49 AM   #7
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
RedCarmel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Horse and Buggy, PA
Posts: 689
Total Cats: 18
Default

I hate to say it but the rear quarter/trunk reminds me of one of those terrible Monte Carlos. Overall I like it though.

Attached Thumbnails
New mustang:  even more slab-sided and small-windowed-2006-07_chevrolet_monte_carlo.jpg  
RedCarmel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 11:50 AM   #8
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,198
Total Cats: 260
Default

300hp turbo 4 cylinder.

Ford dissects the heart of the 2015 Mustang, its engine range - Autoblog

Yes please.


Big up's to Ford, i've been seeing a ton of these driving around in camo. My dad says he has one where he works, in Dearborn... Getting an "upgrade".
Erat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 12:52 PM   #9
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 72,860
Total Cats: 1,788
Default

I figured they were trying to make it look more like a BRZ/Genesis to compete.

I generally like the design, but I HATE the rear. It's got a really ugly ***.

Finally a decent interior however.

Quote:
Will that trend reverse already?
This will require repeal of certain safety standard laws...
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 12:54 PM   #10
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 5,702
Total Cats: 237
Default

-400 lbs, 400+hp, IRS. I like it. Looks are pretty good too, though I agree the rear end kills it.
Fireindc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 01:24 PM   #11
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,684
Total Cats: 555
Default

I like it. Unlike the Camaro, which looks squashed.

Glass is heavy. So, smaller windows means lighter. Also, smaller openings is better from the structural engineering point of view. Add to the fact that glass is not getting much cheaper. The only way to cut cost is by using smaller panels.

Remember, cutting $.50 per car is a huge savings to car companies. That can pay the salary of an engineer to further cut costs.
rleete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 01:27 PM   #12
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,682
Total Cats: 216
Default

Its whatever. I didnt by my '11 Mustang because of what it looks like.

Im interested in the 4 cylinder turbo version of the '15. If the price is right I would trade in my 5.0 for the boost.

EDIT:
Quote:
Finally, the transmissions have received some attention, with the six-speed manual from Getrag getting a new shift linkage, which should provide a shorter, crisper action.
Sweet bay jesus. I hope this part will be compatible with the 11-14 cars.

Last edited by Full_Tilt_Boogie; 12-06-2013 at 01:40 PM.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 07:37 PM   #13
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,460
Total Cats: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fireindc View Post
-400 lbs, 400+hp, IRS. I like it. Looks are pretty good too, though I agree the rear end kills it.
It is gaining weight, not losing it. It is a disappointment in every way to me.
Chilicharger665 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 08:32 PM   #14
I take big bites
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hurricane, UT
Posts: 6,924
Total Cats: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilicharger665 View Post
It is gaining weight, not losing it. It is a disappointment in every way to me.
Rumored to be in the neighborhood of 3300 pounds. It has lost significant weight from previous generations according to that. Not 400 pounds, but still significant. We will see what it ACTUALLY weighs.

I hadn't noticed the slab-sidedness before but I don't think it's near as bad as the Camaro or challenger. Still prefer the glass-to-body ratio of the current gen though, but everything else on the new car is better.

I'd drive it. Give me the V8 though, I don't want the turbo-4. It'll claim high MPG and get low MPG.
turbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 09:08 PM   #15
NB/VVT Connoisseur
iTrader: (23)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,071
Total Cats: 253
Default

Could be worse

Attached Thumbnails
New mustang:  even more slab-sided and small-windowed-chevrolet-corvette_c7_stingray_2014_1600x1200_wallpaper_36.jpg   New mustang:  even more slab-sided and small-windowed-punch-vomit.jpg  
viperormiata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 09:13 PM   #16
I take big bites
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hurricane, UT
Posts: 6,924
Total Cats: 526
Default

I might not love the styling of the rear of the 'Vette but what an awesome car. Really. Just incredible. Do want.
turbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 10:13 PM   #17
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE NM
Posts: 1,460
Total Cats: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbofan View Post
Rumored to be in the neighborhood of 3300 pounds. It has lost significant weight from previous generations according to that. Not 400 pounds, but still significant. We will see what it ACTUALLY weighs.
G.
I just read Edmunds and they claim it will add weight. It is no smaller than the current car and the only weight saving they announced was aluminum fenders instead of steel.
I still think it is ridiculously ugly, so whatever.
Chilicharger665 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 10:37 PM   #18
Murderator
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 36,185
Total Cats: 2,582
Default

everywhere I read says it will lose weight.
18psi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 02:27 PM   #19
I take big bites
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hurricane, UT
Posts: 6,924
Total Cats: 526
Default

^yup
turbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 02:32 PM   #20
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,791
Total Cats: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedCarmel View Post
I hate to say it but the rear quarter/trunk reminds me of one of those terrible Monte Carlos. Overall I like it though.
not even close.

I would say it looks more like the '69 mustang rear end coupled with the existing. saying that im looking at the rear 1/4 window and rear 1/4.
shlammed is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some Really Nice Cars Out Today RotorNutFD3S Insert BS here 17 02-07-2011 12:58 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.