Notices
Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Please tell me how Rush Limbaugh is still relevant in 2012.

Old Mar 9, 2012 | 02:27 PM
  #101  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

So, we've got a president who claimed he would do things that he did not end up doing when the previous president did the exact same thing....?

OUTRAGE! NOOO!

So, how would you propose to fix the issue then, Brainy? It's not an issue specific to a party or candidate, so I would agree with you in that it is a flaw in the system.
Old Mar 9, 2012 | 02:30 PM
  #102  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

If we followed the consitution, and had a supreme court that ruled based on it, we wouldnt have this problem. but its too late, there is no fix.
Old Mar 9, 2012 | 03:38 PM
  #103  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Charley Reese's final column for the Orlando Sentinel...
He has been a journalist for 49 years.
He is retiring and this is HIS LAST COLUMN.

This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be. The article below is completely neutral, neither anti-republican or democrat. Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel, has hit the nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the final analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that impact each one of us every day. It's a short but good read. Worth the time. Worth remembering!

545 vs. 300,000,000 People
-By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House now? He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ...

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...

Last edited by olderguy; Mar 9, 2012 at 04:12 PM.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 11:46 PM
  #104  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

http://www.hundredblackout.com/?p=1234

LOLOLOLOL

Limbaugh may be sponsored by the Westboro Baptist Church!
Old Mar 14, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #105  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
regarding comparisons of Rush Limbaugh to Bill Maher...

I'm fairly certain one of them is a comedian and one of them is DEAD SERIOUS, or at least isn't trying to get a laugh.
Bill Maher is a comedian who has a serious political round-table that airs weekly when he's not paying for sex with prostitutes or smoking illegal drugs. His monologue doesn't save him from criticism. I reserve the "I'm a comedian" scenario for John Stewart.
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #106  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Old Mar 16, 2012 | 09:25 AM
  #107  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Well for one, he's a large feller.

And two, I have a thing for pregnant women.
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 03:24 PM
  #108  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the Fluke stops here:

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

I write to you regarding Georgetown’s health insurance and contraceptive coverage in our plans. Many members of our community have expressed different perspectives on this issue. I am grateful for the respectful ways in which you have shared your opinions.

As you know, like most universities, Georgetown requires that students have health insurance. Students are not required to purchase their health insurance through Georgetown University and are free to acquire health insurance through a third party. The student plan offered by Georgetown is consistent with our Catholic and Jesuit identity and does not cover prescription contraceptives for birth control. It does provide coverage for these prescriptions for students who require them for health reasons unrelated to birth control, as determined by a physician.

After thoughtful and careful consideration, we will continue our current practice for contraceptive coverage in our student health insurance for the coming year, as allowed for under the current rules issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.

There will also be no change to the University’s approach to contraceptive coverage for employees for 2013.

We will be monitoring further regulatory and judicial developments related to the Affordable Care Act. I hope this is helpful in clarifying a matter of concern to many of you.


You have my very best wishes as we conclude our academic year.
Sincerely,

John J. DeGioia
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
Oct 26, 2018 11:00 PM
elesjuan
Build Threads
7
Nov 3, 2015 01:51 PM
Squiblez
Build Threads
2
Sep 22, 2015 10:17 AM
AlwaysBroken
Engine Performance
5
Sep 6, 2015 12:53 AM
IcantDo55
Insert BS here
2
Sep 18, 2009 02:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.