I think this "string 'em up" BS is BS.
Why give a crap about one lousy murder in particular. gay. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 856188)
look up the stats on black on black murders. then lol at everything he says in the video.
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 856197)
Lol at this white-devil propagandist media -----. Been to a cross burning recently?
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 856210)
I only go to the gym to be able to lift crosses.
|
tl;dr
Will bet money 95% of people that think he just shot black kid for being black think he's a white guy. Hell i didn't even realize he was a hispanic tell i decided to stop and read some facts. Also love how MLK Jr. own relatives are saying Jackson and Sharpton are ------- it up for black people, making them look bad and need to stfu. |
Originally Posted by bbundy
(Post 856093)
The world would be a better place if we could get rid of some Flridians actually if they took a lot of the south with them it would help too.
Bob
Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
(Post 856139)
That's hate speech, Bob.
I have determined that Bob is a racist against non-whites. How did I come to this conclusion? Well, according to US demographic information, Florida has a higher percentage of its population that is non-white versus Washington state* (Bob's apparent state of preference). Therefore, he wants to "get rid of" (code for drag behind a pickup truck) "some Floridians" (code for non-whites). I have a call in to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to address this hate speech. *See page 18 |
I thought they were called Canadians.
|
Meanwhile in real news:
"For years, American manufacturers have faced one of the highest tax rates in the world. We want to reduce that by over 20%. We want to drop the rate, particularly, for high-tech manufacturers like you, Mr. President, even further than the 20%," Vice President Joe Biden said at a manufacturing plant in Davenport, Iowa this week. "We want to create a global minimum tax, because American taxpayers shouldn't be providing a larger subsidy for investing abroad than investing at home," Biden said at a campaign event. |
Originally Posted by samnavy
(Post 856234)
Oh yeah... and I'm leaving for El Salvador in a couple hours... will be gone the whole month of April, so good luck.
Talk to yeah in July or September. |
Props to you, Scrappy.
Asfor my 2c on this: Both sides want to get outraged. As an example, you see conservatives dredging up that Trayvon got suspended from school for having a bag with traces of Marijuana years ago - wtf does that have to do with being shot? Counter-example: BLAAAACCK OUUTTRAAAGE, RACIIISSSMMM! from the other side. Dude who shot Trayvon needs to have something more than just the token investigation because his story doesn't match up with the physical evidence nor witness testimony. People are getting their panties in a bunch because they want to get their panties in a bunch over something though - and this goes for both sides. |
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 856321)
because his story doesn't match up with the physical evidence nor witness testimony.
but it does... |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 856327)
but it does...
Impartial sources disagree with you, Brainy. I'm not really up for arguing on this though Brainy. It's full of stupid. People who want to get outraged on both sides are just getting outraged over it when this sort of ---- happens all the time. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 856304)
[I]"We want to create a global minimum tax"
I understand what he meant, but I initially interpreted "global" to mean, well "global." As in "applied globally", where "global", as defined by Webster, means "of, relating to, or involving the entire world." Meaning Biden wants to tax the entire world. And actually, I'm cool with that. This is, amusingly, exactly what the author of "Nuke the Moon: A Realistic Plan for World Peace" proposed in order to fund a massive increase in US military expenditure. Specifically, an "other country tax," described as a tax for being a country other than the U.S. |
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 856333)
It's full of stupid. People who want to get outraged on both sides are just getting outraged over it when this sort of ---- happens all the time.
I think for the first time ever, I agree with you on this part quoted above. Now back to killing Santorum for wanting to kill my porn.... |
I did hear the other day that for the third time ever in their history the New York Post referred to the shooter by using the phrase "white-Hispanic" WTF?
Had he just won the Nobel peace price I'm going to go out on a limb but they would refer to him as a Hispanic, no mention of the "white" part. |
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 856333)
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_1...at-do-we-know/
Impartial sources disagree with you, Brainy. I'm not really up for arguing on this though Brainy. |
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 856333)
Impartial sources disagree with you, Brainy.
because they don't want to get murdered themselves... :brain: |
Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
(Post 856370)
Maybe I am missing something or misunderstanding Zimmerman's side of the story, but I don't see anything in that link that shows an impartial source disagreeing with Zimmerman's version.
Funeral home staff stating Martin had no injuries from any kind of scuffle? |
oh blaen, the voice of reason! case closed. Zimmerman hates people who eat skittles and makes sure they pay for their sins.
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 856321)
Props to you, Scrappy.
Asfor my 2c on this: Both sides want to get outraged. As an example, you see conservatives dredging up that Trayvon got suspended from school for having a bag with traces of Marijuana years ago - wtf does that have to do with being shot? Counter-example: BLAAAACCK OUUTTRAAAGE, RACIIISSSMMM! from the other side. Dude who shot Trayvon needs to have something more than just the token investigation because his story doesn't match up with the physical evidence nor witness testimony. People are getting their panties in a bunch because they want to get their panties in a bunch over something though - and this goes for both sides.
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 856403)
oh blaen, the voice of reason! case closed. Zimmerman hates people who eat skittles and makes sure htey are pay for their sins.
|
I have nothing to say about this "story". Just one of those stories the media jumped on, and everyone followed them on the bandwagon. I bet you could find similar stories happening several times a day in this country.
|
So let me get this straight.
As a private citizen I can follow you on a public street.(even when instructed by LE not to) because you look like you are "up to no good". Initiate a confrontation that leads to a scuffle and then kill you because I felt threatened? Riiight the kid was a UFC fighter you say? That effectively means I can start a fight with you then shoot you because I felt threatened. I'm not interested in the racial element of this story but you better believe if you shot my son in my neighbors front yard and all he was carrying was a bag of skittles, you would not be seeing too many more sunrises. Sharpton, Jesse Jackson et all are annoying but the gun rights nuts who are defending this guy just because he used a gun are just as annoying |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands