DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

custom mid mount intercooler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2012, 04:11 AM
  #41  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

No just the members of this forum dont like repeating them selves for 2 pages and getting no where.
triple88a is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:22 AM
  #42  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
No just the members of this forum dont like repeating them selves for 2 pages and getting no where.
Your right i understand that haha. Im not being sarcastic either, but what i got from this thread is either run my intercooler and piping like the norm or just run a water to air intercool cause then i could actually run it where i want to.
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:32 AM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

The question is where DO you want to run it? Unless you're looking for a rear mount the current miata engine configuration is probably the best available configuration you could ever want. You have an the turbo on one end, the intake on the other end, and then the intercooler to connect them together.

Even better for a v mount but thats a little harder to do.

Attached Thumbnails custom mid mount intercooler?-miata%2520engine.jpg  
triple88a is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:43 AM
  #44  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
The question is where DO you want to run it? Unless you're looking for a rear mount the current miata engine configuration is probably the best available configuration you could ever want. You have an the turbo on one end, the intake on the other end, and then the intercooler to connect them together.

Even better for a v mount but thats a little harder to do.

The main thing i was looking to do was get rid of the normal intercooler piping and move the intercooler somewhere where the piping was as short as possible, just like that v mount setup... but i was trying to steer clear of the v mount and over the rad setup. Im just looking for the best setup with the shortest intercooler plumbing.
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:50 AM
  #45  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Okay well i'm guessing the over the rad setup you saw was shitty. Over the rad is the 2nd shortest possible after the V mount.

I have an over the rad setup and will do it again if i had to.
This is the total piping from the turbo to the TB. The 2nd bend on the right hose is not needed. This was an intercooler for the supercharger m45.







Attached Thumbnails custom mid mount intercooler?-jric.jpg   custom mid mount intercooler?-p081110_1626_02.jpg   custom mid mount intercooler?-p160411_1726.jpg   custom mid mount intercooler?-dscf0005.jpg  
triple88a is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:52 AM
  #46  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
Okay well i'm guessing the over the rad setup you saw was shitty. Over the rad is the 2nd shortest possible after the V mount.

I have an over the rad setup and will do it again if i had to.
This is the total piping from the turbo to the TB.







well your right the one i saw was hacked and shitty compared to that. Is that yours?
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:59 AM
  #47  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Yes. I've been running it for about 2 years now, I checked it about 2 weeks ago when i replaced the o rings on my BOV. Everything is still dandy.

Its the "track dog" intercooler setup. I got a good deal on it but if i had to do it again i'd easily be able to make it with an ebay piping and an intercooler.
triple88a is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 05:06 AM
  #48  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
Yes. I've been running it for about 2 years now, I checked it about 2 weeks ago when i replaced the o rings on my BOV. Everything is still dandy.
What size is your IC piping, and also i have an NA just curious about any hood fitment problems with different IC piping sizes.
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 05:11 AM
  #49  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

The piping is 2.25 ID. Plenty of room for 2.5" though.
triple88a is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:09 AM
  #50  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by dumpdbassethound
Hahaha never said I wanna run a half rad! Apparently it's never been done on a miata so it will never work on a miata thanks guys!

actually it has; youre not special.

http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread...de+intercooler

Last edited by Braineack; 12-30-2012 at 09:39 AM.
Braineack is online now  
Old 12-30-2012, 04:06 PM
  #51  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
This is what i saw, thats why i thought it was possible to run a smaller rad because this guy says he has no cooling issues.
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 05:47 PM
  #52  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

I actually think I explained what I wanted to do wrong. A smaller length rad but thicker!
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 05:49 PM
  #53  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

and if you read about how how heat exchangers work, you'll realize how stupid that is
18psi is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 05:55 PM
  #54  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
and if you read about how how heat exchangers work, you'll realize how stupid that is
Well with the intercooler on the front if the rad like i originally was talking about should work... My rad would still be bigger then that guy on m.net if he had no cooling issues I shouldn't either.
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 05:57 PM
  #55  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

"his **** didn't blow up therefore it must be great"

Flawless logic

Tell you what. Do what you want and make sure to report back. We're beating a dead horse here
18psi is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 06:31 PM
  #56  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
"his **** didn't blow up therefore it must be great"

Flawless logic

Tell you what. Do what you want and make sure to report back. We're beating a dead horse here
Your way too angry over nothing, I've already said ill prob be going with the over the rad setup I was just talking about where my idea came from since someone posted a link to the original thread from where I got my idea.
dumpdbassethound is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 07:36 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
ctdrftna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cromwell CT
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
Default

when the attacks are not on you, this forum is comical to read
ctdrftna is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 08:06 PM
  #58  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Originally Posted by dumpdbassethound
This is what i saw, thats why i thought it was possible to run a smaller rad because this guy says he has no cooling issues.
Stock miatas have cooling issues and this guy is running a SMALLER than stock (see the post where he says he lost 3 cups of coolant). Also the new radiator is less efficient than the stock one since its much thicker but less overall size. So to sum it up its worse than stock and stock miatas already run hot.
triple88a is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:50 PM
  #59  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by dumpdbassethound
Your way too angry over nothing, I've already said ill prob be going with the over the rad setup I was just talking about where my idea came from since someone posted a link to the original thread from where I got my idea.
LOL you have not seen me angry.

This is me being bored.
18psi is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:54 PM
  #60  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dumpdbassethound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Total Cats: -13
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
Stock miatas have cooling issues and this guy is running a SMALLER than stock (see the post where he says he lost 3 cups of coolant). Also the new radiator is less efficient than the stock one since its much thicker but less overall size. So to sum it up its worse than stock and stock miatas already run hot.
But the fact that the OP of that thread states he's had no cooling issues with hard driving on 90 degree plus days. And again I said the setup I was looking to run would have a bigger rad then he runs. This pic from that thread is what I was looking to achieve.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y22...campics028.jpg
dumpdbassethound is offline  


Quick Reply: custom mid mount intercooler?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 PM.