Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Exhaust Manifold backpressure question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:01 AM
  #1  
Der_Idiot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,489
Total Cats: 29
From: Saint Paul, MN
Default Exhaust Manifold backpressure question

So I was playing with the BW turbo configurator and it estimates 9psi backpressure at the turbine (with boost set to 21psi), what would be considered excessive? Obviously 0 would be best but seeing as the TS housing on the 6258 and 6758 wont be happening, this is the best that can be done. With a goal of 400-450 (leaving some play in case I can't keep up at 400), the 6758 is the ideal setup for my goal if this isn't too bad..

Here's a link to the config.

Edit- It also states that the wastegate is 'flow choked', I assume it's because it's of insufficient diameter, thus needing an EWG?
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:13 AM
  #2  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

How can you have less pressure on the turbine side and more pressure on the compressor side? Without more pressure on the turbine side this sounds like a magical turbo.
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #3  
Der_Idiot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,489
Total Cats: 29
From: Saint Paul, MN
Default

9psi on the turbine side. Essentially there's pressure built up in the exhaust manifold, throttled by the turbo.
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:28 AM
  #4  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Der_Idiot
9psi on the turbine side. Essentially there's pressure built up in the exhaust manifold, throttled by the turbo.
Anyone I've ever spoken to says there's 1.5-2x more pressure on the turbine side than the compressor side because it takes equal or more energy to turn the compressor. I'm not an engineer, but I'm quite eager to read more on this.
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:36 AM
  #5  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Anyone I've ever spoken to says there's 1.5-2x more pressure on the turbine side than the compressor side because it takes equal or more energy to turn the compressor. I'm not an engineer, but I'm quite eager to read more on this.
Pretty sure that's wrong. Energy =/= pressure
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:45 AM
  #6  
Techsalvager's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,866
Total Cats: 0
From: albany, ga
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Anyone I've ever spoken to says there's 1.5-2x more pressure on the turbine side than the compressor side because it takes equal or more energy to turn the compressor. I'm not an engineer, but I'm quite eager to read more on this.
thats indeed wrong, and you can buy exhaust pressure sensor to go into the manifold to see if you wanted.

With audi's antilag they were pushing air though the intake into the exhaust manifold once more pressure built up in the intake compared to the exhaust manifold
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #7  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Pretty sure that's wrong. Energy =/= pressure
heat energy causes increases pressure, transforms into kenetic energy.
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:52 AM
  #8  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
heat energy causes increases pressure, transforms into kenetic energy.
but is there energy lost?
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:52 AM
  #9  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Anyone I've ever spoken to says there's 1.5-2x more pressure on the turbine side than the compressor side because it takes equal or more energy to turn the compressor. I'm not an engineer, but I'm quite eager to read more on this.
This is not true and a huge overgeneralization as well, even if it was true. Exhaust gas pressure in the manifold is a function of many variables and will vary from being more than your intake charge pressure to less than your intake charge pressure, largely a function of engine speed and load.

Quickly looking back at some data I've collected in the past on this stuff, exhaust gas pressure varied from 1.75 to .70 of intake pressure. Lower load and low engine speed generally translated to higher exhaust/intake pressure ratio.
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 12:12 PM
  #10  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
This is not true and a huge overgeneralization as well, even if it was true.
Tone down the disrespect.
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 12:29 PM
  #11  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
but is there energy lost?

of course. just sayin.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
Nov 22, 2016 09:01 PM
Aroundcorner
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Oct 1, 2015 03:20 PM
cale saurage
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Oct 1, 2015 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 PM.