ms1 or gen 2?
Hello everyone, im currently building a turbo 1.6 miata. And before you guys flame me for boosting a 1.6 instead of doing a 1.8, i like the 1.6 and always wanted to do a 1.6
. that being said, i have access to a mspnp for pretty cheap, is it worth just going gen 2 over 1? Oviously i want to save money, but if gen 2 is drastically better, ill spend the extra money. i have a goal of about 230whp, (begi mani, 2560r, rx7 inj, torsen diff, etc..) all i need at this point is an ecu. So ms1pnp for the cheap(from a freind), or new ms2pnp (not really into the diy,im going the pnp route).Like i said again, please dont flame me, just let me know your opinions, thanks guys
. that being said, i have access to a mspnp for pretty cheap, is it worth just going gen 2 over 1? Oviously i want to save money, but if gen 2 is drastically better, ill spend the extra money. i have a goal of about 230whp, (begi mani, 2560r, rx7 inj, torsen diff, etc..) all i need at this point is an ecu. So ms1pnp for the cheap(from a freind), or new ms2pnp (not really into the diy,im going the pnp route).Like i said again, please dont flame me, just let me know your opinions, thanks guys
MS1 is fine for simple applications like a track car. But if you want a streetable DD with comforts like AC, you need the newer technology.
Now, if you're a computer science major and want to write your own software . . . but I must warn you, MS1 is coded in assembly language.
Now, if you're a computer science major and want to write your own software . . . but I must warn you, MS1 is coded in assembly language.
MS1 is fine for simple applications like a track car. But if you want a streetable DD with comforts like AC, you need the newer technology.
Now, if you're a computer science major and want to write your own software . . . but I must warn you, MS1 is coded in assembly language.
Now, if you're a computer science major and want to write your own software . . . but I must warn you, MS1 is coded in assembly language.
Lots of the flaming arises over people arguing for some advantage or preference for a 1.6, as in the infamous m.net "free revving" hype. It's cool to use what you have, but more engine is more better. It's really important to keep perspective and realize that a good manifold costs a significant fraction of what a used BP does.
Lots of the flaming arises over people arguing for some advantage or preference for a 1.6, as in the infamous m.net "free revving" hype. It's cool to use what you have, but more engine is more better. It's really important to keep perspective and realize that a good manifold costs a significant fraction of what a used BP does.
A free 1.8, yet you choose to build a 1.6, before any parts have even been purchased. You think with inferior brain function, so you might as well use an ms1.
Ms2 already ordered, have all my parts already as well. Will and up building the 1.8 and take my time. Thanks for the input
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darbymx5
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Sep 5, 2016 11:34 PM









