DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

My custom turbo kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2018, 08:45 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
brainzata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 542
Total Cats: 17
Default

Too many welds everywhere/
brainzata is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 12:21 AM
  #42  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
nigelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 1,461
Total Cats: 388
Default

Originally Posted by brainzata
Too many welds everywhere/
But they are nice ones!
__________________
FlowForce 380 |640| 960 Injectors // LS Coil PNP harnesses and complete kits // goflowforce.com

nigelt is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 02:33 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
elior77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -481
Default

I would like to see hard line for the radiator to the engine back - like yours and hard line for the heater - replacing the one on the manifold.
elior77 is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 02:35 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
elior77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -481
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Just FYI, based on what you've shown here, you have 3-4 years and $50k in R&D to go before you will have a product that will match an MKTurbo setup in value.
I highly doubt that, a simple log manifold with a straight forward DP does not require 3-4 years and $50k in R&D.
elior77 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -4 Leave a negcat
Old 11-20-2018, 06:13 AM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
rrjwilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by The_Defensive_Octopus
maybe I'll make a 3" and a 2.5" next time for testing purposes?
This would give renewed evidence that 2.5" is way to small but not change the result. This has long been proven.

Paraphrasing A. Graham Bell
four stroke four stroke
and
forced induction forced induction
books but "Engines require back pressure to make the most power but turbochargers are the restriction so everything after should not be restrictive".
There are various niggles that fly in the face of this paraphrased rule (like going too large, a supercharged system or ram air NA system) but its broadly accurate.

Welding looks good but casting is very much king due to its longevity. Welded manifolds simply don't survive endurance track torture testing well enough. Hence MKTurbo, Kraken, TSE doing that.

TurboTim is the daddy for surviving welding stuff but I do not know of any one by him that has been tracked to the destructive forces Emilio provides. This is not to say this hasn't happened though I literally do not know of one that is all.

Originally Posted by elior77
I highly doubt that, a simple log manifold with a straight forward DP does not require 3-4 years and $50k in R&D.
Then you haven't been paying attention. Log manifolds, retaining gear, manifold cuts, manifold material, manifold treatments have all been thoroughly worked through to survive the sort of treatment the high power full track racing gives. AutoX is simply not hard enough for long enough to truly test them. Sav, Emilio, ThePass, Shuiend and many others have created and then very destructively tested their creations to give us all data on what not to do.
rrjwilson is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 11-20-2018, 07:03 AM
  #46  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Originally Posted by elior77
I highly doubt that, a simple log manifold with a straight forward DP does not require 3-4 years and $50k in R&D.
you got the dum. Cover your mouth, Dont spread it.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 11-20-2018, 08:33 AM
  #47  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by elior77
I highly doubt that, a simple log manifold with a straight forward DP does not require 3-4 years and $50k in R&D.
The single manifold and a down pipe are not the expenses. It is all the tools to be able to repeat it. Then the 5 or 6 miata I own in various configurations to test fit and build off of. Tons of investment capital trying to get materials in bulk in sizes and shapes I want. Picking up competitors products to do testing on them to see what works and what does not. All of it adds up very very quickly.

Savington has been working on his IC setup for 1.5 to 2 years now. I completely understand why it is taking him so long and can guess at the troubles he is having. If it is taking a company that specializes in NA/NB miata's that long then there may be a reason for it.

We are not saying the OP made a bad manifold or turbo setup. What we are saying is taking it from a one time setup, to something that is repeatable and sellable at a price point that fits in the miata market place is going to be very hard to do. With the skills OP has he needs to pick a different platform that he can market and sell high end ramhorn manifolds to. The miata market is just full of cheap asses who don't want to pay those prices. The ones who will pay those prices, know what they want, know the market, and know that the TSE cast manifold is the only thing on the market that has been proven to stand up to the abuses required.

Name:  l2t11uT.jpg
Views: 30
Size:  28.9 KB

Last edited by shuiend; 11-20-2018 at 08:44 AM.
shuiend is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 09:48 AM
  #48  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
The_Defensive_Octopus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 14
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Just FYI, based on what you've shown here, you have 3-4 years and $50k in R&D to go before you will have a product that will match an MKTurbo setup in value.
Originally Posted by shuiend
You are about 10 years behind the testing curve on the 2.5" to 3" debate. There are a lot of things you are asking that show you have not researched the market a ton. I can tell you that the majority of the advice in posted in here is dead on.
Thanks for the dose of hard reality, it's probably what I needed. I haven't been looking forward to another cold winter in my garage, but now I'm ready to get after it and build something better!
The_Defensive_Octopus is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 10:01 AM
  #49  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by The_Defensive_Octopus
Thanks for the dose of hard reality, it's probably what I needed. I haven't been looking forward to another cold winter in my garage, but now I'm ready to get after it and build something better!
With the quality it looks like you can produce you need to be on a more expensive platform. One where the clientele are not cheap asses. You could do very well I think if you can find a car where the owners can afford to pay for what your time is worth. That is where I think your major issue will be. Get on the GTR or Porshe bandwagon where the owners have no issue paying for the quality you can provide.

You are choosing about the worst time to get into the miata turbo market. There has been more R&D and new products coming out for the NA/NB in the last 5 years then I would say the previous 15 to 20. There has never been this much abundance in choice already on the market. If you would have popped up in 2011/2012 when Absurdflow was winding down and the TSE manifold was not out, you could have hit a niche in the market. That boat has sort of sailed at this point though.
shuiend is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 12:03 PM
  #50  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by elior77
I highly doubt that, a simple log manifold with a straight forward DP does not require 3-4 years and $50k in R&D.
You are too inexperienced to even grasp the scope of the problem being discussed.
Savington is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 12:14 PM
  #51  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by The_Defensive_Octopus

I can design the new manifold to fit an EFR as well as the basic T25/28 turbo's. in fact I could probably offer a t3 option if that's what the people want. as far as durability is concerned, that's still untested, anything i have made hasn't been run for longer than a year. I can say with confidence that I am a good welder its been my career for almost 10 years now and I'm starting to get good. All the manifolds I've made are SCH10 304 everything is argon purged and welded with full penetration. Here is the most recent one I've made, its for my buddys big turbo 1.8t VW, i'm pretty proud of it
Your welds look nice.

I didn't mean to talk down on your quality of work necessarily, but rather that that style of manifold doesn't hold up on these cars.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 05:50 PM
  #52  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
The_Defensive_Octopus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 14
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
With the quality it looks like you can produce you need to be on a more expensive platform. One where the clientele are not cheap asses. You could do very well I think if you can find a car where the owners can afford to pay for what your time is worth. That is where I think your major issue will be. Get on the GTR or Porshe bandwagon where the owners have no issue paying for the quality you can provide.

You are choosing about the worst time to get into the miata turbo market. There has been more R&D and new products coming out for the NA/NB in the last 5 years then I would say the previous 15 to 20. There has never been this much abundance in choice already on the market. If you would have popped up in 2011/2012 when Absurdflow was winding down and the TSE manifold was not out, you could have hit a niche in the market. That boat has sort of sailed at this point though.
Probably, but this is the project in front of me. I'm still going to try and make the best product possible and have it set up to be repeatably produceable, if anything it will be good practice. I do have aspirations to develop products for other vehicles with slightly more open markets.
The_Defensive_Octopus is offline  
Old 11-20-2018, 05:58 PM
  #53  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
The_Defensive_Octopus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 14
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Your welds look nice.

I didn't mean to talk down on your quality of work necessarily, but rather that that style of manifold doesn't hold up on these cars.
No i get your concern, tubular manifolds are a wear item, they will crack at some point. Its just the nature of the conditions they are put through. There are some tricks for getting them to last longer from what i've been told. I really need more testing to figure out what they can take, but i've only been doing this for a year so that's still to come.
The_Defensive_Octopus is offline  
Old 11-21-2018, 02:11 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
elior77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -481
Default

Originally Posted by ryansmoneypit
you got the dum. Cover your mouth, Dont spread it.
Your ugly and stupid response is a simple projection of your true self - you can look down at "shuiend" response and maybe you will see your low low self in comparison .
elior77 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -5 Leave a negcat
Old 11-21-2018, 02:13 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
elior77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -481
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
You are too inexperienced to even grasp the scope of the problem being discussed.
You know nothing about me and my grasp of the scope is not something you can measure.
elior77 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -6 Leave a negcat
Old 11-21-2018, 07:23 AM
  #56  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Originally Posted by elior77
Your ugly and stupid response is a simple projection of your true self - you can look down at "shuiend" response and maybe you will see your low low self in comparison .
Originally Posted by elior77
You know nothing about me and my grasp of the scope is not something you can measure.
lol
You dont know the first thing about developing a product for the consumer market and your off the cuff comment proves that. If you're going to spout off about things you aren't sure of, expect to get some noise about it.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 11-21-2018, 08:10 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
elior77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -481
Default

I developed and sold more products then you, little dirty mouth for sure.
elior77 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -7 Leave a negcat
Old 11-21-2018, 08:12 AM
  #58  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

After reading your build thread and posted threads in general, i sure hope you're not developing and selling car parts/services...
concealer404 is offline  
Old 11-21-2018, 08:18 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
elior77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 650
Total Cats: -481
Default

Your ignorance and negative personalty is well shown in your every post.

I sell, tune and build for many other that are race proven.
elior77 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -6 Leave a negcat
Old 11-21-2018, 08:26 AM
  #60  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by elior77
Your ignorance and negative personalty is well shown in your every post.

I sell, tune and build for many other that are race proven.
Scary.
concealer404 is offline  


Quick Reply: My custom turbo kit



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.