Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Rear mounted turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #1  
Bond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default Rear mounted turbo?

Been looking around the forum for a couple months now doing some research before I try anything or say anything stupid but...

I searched but couldn't find anything on this and was wondering if anyone had tried a rear mounted turbo on a miata. I know a friend who put an STS rear mount on his rx8 and is running 7-8 PSI pushing out about 350 RWHP. I'm not sure where there would be room for a turbo under a miata but it seemed like a decent idea to keep the engine bay temps down. I'd like to know what you guys thought about this system. Thanks in advance...

STSturbo.com
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:41 PM
  #2  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

There is a guy on clubroadster doing it... the majority of us think he is silly for doing it. He's doing a much cleaner install this time around, still rigged in back a bit though.

On cars that don't have space to do it... its usefull. On cars with space... its stupid... period.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #3  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

there is plenty of room under there once you get rid of the factory muffler.

We toyed with the idea a bit for my daily driver before I settled on the BEGi S. the idea of having to run an additional pump(s) to get oil(& water) back there turned me off.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:51 PM
  #4  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

The increased plumbing for both the charge piping and oiling isn't something I would want to deal with. Kurt Rohmer has threads here and miata.net about doing it. Most of his problems stem from not using the correct parts for any of his build. Everything he used was super cheap, such as rubber hose for charge piping.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #5  
Bond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

Originally Posted by paul
there is plenty of room under there once you get rid of the factory muffler.

We toyed with the idea a bit for my daily driver before I settled on the BEGi S. the idea of having to run an additional pump(s) to get oil(& water) back there turned me off.
Never thought about that. Supposedly though a rear mount is supposed to be able tocool the charge with the long boost pipes leading up to the front so there is no need for a FMIC. Interesting idea but not sure if it is practical for our cars.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #6  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Yes, that's one of the reasons I considered it. That and I had a hard-on for keeping my RB 4:1 header for some reason.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #7  
Bond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

just found this

https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/sho...ht=Kurt+Rohmer

my bad... ha ha
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
left field's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 173
Total Cats: 0
From: Hartville, OH
Default

under the hood is the easier way of doing it. high engine bay temps aren't really a problem, just build it right.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #9  
XxGoKoUxX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 558
Total Cats: 0
From: orlando, FL
Default

Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:14 AM
  #10  
Mach929's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,494
Total Cats: 0
From: lansdale PA
Default

i don't see a problem with it but i tend to like different stuff. the miata does have a good amount of room back there i don't think that will be a problem. My only worry is the oil system, it's gotta be just right. in my mind they work better with bigger turbos and lower boost?
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:20 AM
  #11  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

That guy has no hair on his ***.

Lucky ****.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #12  
miatamania's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

What about using a rear mount for a twincharged setup?
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #13  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

Originally Posted by miatamania
What about using a rear mount for a twincharged setup?
You can do that all in the engine bay also.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #14  
disturbedfan121's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,552
Total Cats: -2
From: Freehold, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by miatamania
What about using a rear mount for a twincharged setup?
if alta can squeeze a supercharger AND turbo under the hood of a mini, our engine bays can fit anything you can think of.

here's the link for anyone who cares-
http://altaminiperformance.com/produ.../22/Twurbo-Kit
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 01:14 AM
  #15  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

imo its not worth the effort, especially since miatas have so much room under the hood for a proper turbo setup
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 01:38 AM
  #16  
miatamania's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

I know you CAN do it under the hood, I was just thinking of where a rear mount could actually help?
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 01:51 AM
  #17  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

on a gto or a corvette where there is little room under the hood i can see it working....IN FACT, the sts kits they tested on the vettes were VERY impressive
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #18  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Rear mount turbos are used when a turbo can not be confined closer to the engine in the traditional way. In a miata a remote mount would offer no real appreciable advantages. The added complexity sucks. Plus it will spool later.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Name:  turbo.jpg
Views: 3240
Size:  100.4 KB

Volvo 440 turbo as its nice and small to minimize spool up time.
Boost came in about 4k, lag was almost non-existant.

Enough said. That toy of a turbo should spool fully during cranking. IIRC, it's a Garrett T2 compressor wheel and a T15 Turbine at .48 A/R.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #20  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Rear mount turbo on a Miata is super awesome...




























































If you have an LSx in the engine bay!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.