Rear mounted turbo?
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Been looking around the forum for a couple months now doing some research before I try anything or say anything stupid but...
I searched but couldn't find anything on this and was wondering if anyone had tried a rear mounted turbo on a miata. I know a friend who put an STS rear mount on his rx8 and is running 7-8 PSI pushing out about 350 RWHP. I'm not sure where there would be room for a turbo under a miata but it seemed like a decent idea to keep the engine bay temps down. I'd like to know what you guys thought about this system. Thanks in advance...
STSturbo.com
I searched but couldn't find anything on this and was wondering if anyone had tried a rear mounted turbo on a miata. I know a friend who put an STS rear mount on his rx8 and is running 7-8 PSI pushing out about 350 RWHP. I'm not sure where there would be room for a turbo under a miata but it seemed like a decent idea to keep the engine bay temps down. I'd like to know what you guys thought about this system. Thanks in advance...
STSturbo.com
There is a guy on clubroadster doing it... the majority of us think he is silly for doing it. He's doing a much cleaner install this time around, still rigged in back a bit though.
On cars that don't have space to do it... its usefull. On cars with space... its stupid... period.
On cars that don't have space to do it... its usefull. On cars with space... its stupid... period.
there is plenty of room under there once you get rid of the factory muffler.
We toyed with the idea a bit for my daily driver before I settled on the BEGi S. the idea of having to run an additional pump(s) to get oil(& water) back there turned me off.
We toyed with the idea a bit for my daily driver before I settled on the BEGi S. the idea of having to run an additional pump(s) to get oil(& water) back there turned me off.
The increased plumbing for both the charge piping and oiling isn't something I would want to deal with. Kurt Rohmer has threads here and miata.net about doing it. Most of his problems stem from not using the correct parts for any of his build. Everything he used was super cheap, such as rubber hose for charge piping.
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Never thought about that. Supposedly though a rear mount is supposed to be able tocool the charge with the long boost pipes leading up to the front so there is no need for a FMIC. Interesting idea but not sure if it is practical for our cars.
i don't see a problem with it but i tend to like different stuff. the miata does have a good amount of room back there i don't think that will be a problem. My only worry is the oil system, it's gotta be just right. in my mind they work better with bigger turbos and lower boost?
if alta can squeeze a supercharger AND turbo under the hood of a mini, our engine bays can fit anything you can think of.
here's the link for anyone who cares-
http://altaminiperformance.com/produ.../22/Twurbo-Kit
here's the link for anyone who cares-
http://altaminiperformance.com/produ.../22/Twurbo-Kit
Rear mount turbos are used when a turbo can not be confined closer to the engine in the traditional way. In a miata a remote mount would offer no real appreciable advantages. The added complexity sucks. Plus it will spool later.

Volvo 440 turbo as its nice and small to minimize spool up time.
Boost came in about 4k, lag was almost non-existant.
Enough said. That toy of a turbo should spool fully during cranking. IIRC, it's a Garrett T2 compressor wheel and a T15 Turbine at .48 A/R.







