Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

RX8 injectors differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 01:25 AM
  #21  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

I'm pretty certain I hit 200whp on my stock 99 injectors.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 01:44 AM
  #22  
Twodoor's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 628
Total Cats: 44
From: Meridian, Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by thirdgen
I'm pretty certain I hit 200whp on my stock 99 injectors.
Both begi and flyin miata say the stock 99
Injectors Max out there. If that is the case the RX8 425cc injectors should Max out at around 325 on gasoline or 250 on E85.

Thanks,

Keith
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 08:59 AM
  #23  
curly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

I'd kinda worry about 250 with e85. After hearing some testimonies on these injectors, I think they'd be fine with pump gas. I've never tuned with E85, but I hear it requires a LOT of gas. Might wanna consider an adjustable fuel pressure regulator, or larger injectors.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 09:35 AM
  #24  
[Ode]'s Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Total Cats: 4
From: Helsinki, Finland
Default

That's way above what RX-8 injectors can do. I'm capped at ~200 hp at crank (!), running around 90% duty cycle @ AFR 12.2. And yeah, that's E85 with stock fuel pressure.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 11:56 AM
  #25  
Twodoor's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 628
Total Cats: 44
From: Meridian, Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by [Ode]
That's way above what RX-8 injectors can do. I'm capped at ~200 hp at crank (!), running around 90% duty cycle @ AFR 12.2. And yeah, that's E85 with stock fuel pressure.
What fuel pump are you using and is this on an NB running 60 psi of fuel pressure? Last dyno session I made 200whp and I was running pig rich. That was on "winter blend" E85 though (E70).

Keith
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 03:26 PM
  #26  
[Ode]'s Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Total Cats: 4
From: Helsinki, Finland
Default

Nope, it's NA with 43psi (?) referenced fuel pressure regulator. NB 60 psi regulator is not referenced to manifold so i guess they are effectively the same at 7 psi of boost i'm running.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 03:44 PM
  #27  
Vincentmiata's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 197
Total Cats: 19
From: Eindhoven, The netherlands
Default

hi, all

Since there was only one person that has replied on a topic that has experience with these injectors i will ask again

Today i picked up a couple of yellow 4450 ones. And a few hours later i got a mail that some has a couple of purple 4460.. At first i was looking for this one but the rx-8 model that has these injector where never imported to the netherlands. So i gave up searching and picked up de the yellow ones.



Does anyone more has experience with these 4460 purple ones?
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 07:40 PM
  #28  
curly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Vincentmiata
Does anyone more has experience with these 4460 purple ones?

Nope.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 07:56 PM
  #29  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by Twodoor
If that is the case the RX8 425cc injectors should Max out at around 325 on gasoline or 250 on E85.
I was shooting for around 260whp, glad to see I picked injectors that will be suffice.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 11:42 PM
  #30  
Twodoor's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 628
Total Cats: 44
From: Meridian, Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by [Ode]
Nope, it's NA with 43psi (?) referenced fuel pressure regulator. NB 60 psi regulator is not referenced to manifold so i guess they are effectively the same at 7 psi of boost i'm running.
Is your FPR a 1:1 ratio? That is what I am used to on turbo mitsubishi's. Yeah, at 7 psi of boost you would have around 50 psi fuel pressure, keeping the differential pressure between the fuel rail and intake manifold at 43 psi. Since mine is not referenced to manifold pressure I would still have 60 psi of fuel pressure, and the differential pressure between my fuel rail and the intake manifold would be 53 psi. It may not be a huge amount, but a 10 psi pressure difference will make a difference in how much power you can make.

Keith
Old Mar 14, 2017 | 03:52 PM
  #31  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

Bringing this back to get some input on my build. See Se Post 102

I would think I should be at those kind of power levels at 80% DC on these injectors. I know both @Savington and Emilio have also used them in the past.

Note that I have gone to a return-style fuel system.

Should I be looking at the DW100 or DW200 to replace my fuel pump?
Old Mar 15, 2017 | 12:43 PM
  #32  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

I ran an experiment this morning. Nice and cold, so already 1% more fuel requested due to MAT Corr. Then I changed the target AFR from 11.7 to 11.4 (Fueling is "Incorporate AFR")

Ran full pedal. IDC went to 108%. At that point, Target AFR was 11.4, but Measured AFR was 11.9. I'm pretty sure I'm no longer controlling fuel.

So, for now, I'm backing down max boost at high RPM so that I'm at least below 100% IDC.

Question remains: Would this be helped by a new pump or not? Or am I at the limit of the Yellows with 3-bar, MAP referenced fuel system.
Old Mar 15, 2017 | 10:03 PM
  #33  
Bronson M's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,109
Total Cats: 220
Default

What pump are you running? I can tell you I'm seeing fuel pressure drop at 6 to 7psi or roughly 175whp. I'm throwing in a walbro 190.
Old Mar 15, 2017 | 10:29 PM
  #34  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

Original Stock with 95k miles.

I've pretty much decided to back down from 194 to 188kPa, which gives me 96% Inj Duty Cycle until I have the car properly dyno'ed, which will be who knows when.
Old Mar 16, 2017 | 06:14 AM
  #35  
Bronson M's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,109
Total Cats: 220
Default

I guarantee you that your fuel pressure is dropping off substantialy. You are out of fuel pump capacity by a large margin. To complicate things it's not like your fuel pressure will drop off consistently every time you go WOT, battery voltage, temperature, ECT. Will all affect how much the pressure drops off so you will see large variations in pressure. I wouldn't​ continue to run the car at these boost levels until you get a pump.

From what I've read you'll get so.e pressure creep at idle with any pump larger than a walbro 190. The 190 will easily support 300whp, so there isn't a good reason to run anything bigger.
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 06:46 PM
  #36  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Bronson M
I guarantee you that your fuel pressure is dropping off substantialy. You are out of fuel pump capacity by a large margin. To complicate things it's not like your fuel pressure will drop off consistently every time you go WOT, battery voltage, temperature, ECT. Will all affect how much the pressure drops off so you will see large variations in pressure. I wouldn't​ continue to run the car at these boost levels until you get a pump.

From what I've read you'll get so.e pressure creep at idle with any pump larger than a walbro 190. The 190 will easily support 300whp, so there isn't a good reason to run anything bigger.
I don't know if "substantially", but that does seem like root cause. Following is an un-tuned pull after putting in a DW100. Looks like I have about 10% more fuel available at the top end.




Also, idle and cruise did not change, so that indicates that indeed, the DW100 does not over-power the FPR (1999 European MAP referenced).
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 06:53 PM
  #37  
Bronson M's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,109
Total Cats: 220
Default

10% is a nearly a full AFR point, so tOmato / tomAto.....It was quite a bit.

Considering the dw100 flows 165 lph it won't over power the regulator. I just swapped pumps to a walbro 190 because I was loosing pressure at WOT and found a 255 walbro in the tank, I'm running a fuel pressure sending unit and saw a 12 psi drop in pressure at high flow conditions. It was rocking up to 74psi at low flow and dropping back to the NB 62psi at wot. I just thought my sending unit wasn't calibrated, but ends up I had the opposite issue that you did.

Glad you got it fixed.
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 10:09 PM
  #38  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

Good Point. 10% at that level is another 20 HP, potentially. And yes, it was a full AFR (10.7 vs 11.7) and at 90% DC while achieving that.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
Oct 19, 2015 03:23 PM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM.