Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Setup teaser pics....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
brgracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
From: Ambler, PA
Default Setup teaser pics....

It's been a loooooong time coming as custom fab stuff takes awhile, but here are some teaser pics of the finished stuff:


V-band flange machined into turbo housing itself.



Some manifold shots. All SS with backpurged welds.




SS downpipe with inflow from EWG with V-bands.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #2  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,705
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Wow. I know nothing about your new project.. built motor?

That manifold is dead sexy.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #3  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Originally Posted by Fireindc
Wow. I know nothing about your new project.. built motor?

That manifold is dead sexy.
Everything there is sexy! Here I was feeling happy about my car coming back together.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #4  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I love flipside products. It's gonna be Bad-A man.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #5  
airbrush1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,038
Total Cats: 9
From: Baltimore Maryland
Default

fab work looks beautiful. Will the WG placement be optimal though, it seems to me that the exhaust gasses will have to reverse direction completely to flow out of there (take into account that I have no knowledge of flow dynamics other than what my tiny brain tells me)
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Looks like you wiped off the *** stains before taking the pictures.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #7  
brgracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
From: Ambler, PA
Default

Setup list will come later in my build thread so don't want to get into it just yet as a few things are changing last minute.

Airbrush, I agree that the EWG placement is far from ideal, both on the manifold and when rejoining the DP, but space and welding does have it's limits. Also, a few other manifolds with similar EWG flow or only on runner #4 have not had huge boost control issues so I think I can live with it.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Horray for pics I'm very interested in seeing how this 2871/T3 inlet and long runner SS mani works! (Assuming that's still the turbo you're going with??)

Still a bummer we couldn't work something out...maybe I'll just use the same turbo in T2 flavor with a new A/C P/S friendly absurdflow and spank you in spool, hp, torque, weight, and less melted underhood pieces, then sell it for cost. hehe jk buddy. Seriously, nice manifold and DP. you will enjoy it!

PS I'm glad you are doing ok, I had a dream about you last night where you died. Strange.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #9  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Is that an ebay manifold?


J/K Looking good. More pics! And any more details on the manifold and its' construction? Weld ells?
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #10  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Oh and V-bands are "the sex". Very clean setup! Nothing worse than tightening those 5 DP bolts.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:00 PM
  #11  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

I'm not worried.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #12  
brgracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
From: Ambler, PA
Default

Originally Posted by paul
I'm not worried.
Didn't realize this was a competition. Plus you have 200cc+ displacement and a 99 head vs. my 1.6 so not really apples to apples.

Originally Posted by TurboTim
PS I'm glad you are doing ok, I had a dream about you last night where you died. Strange.
Wow, didn't know you were mad at me that I die in your dreams. Thanks. As for the build, yeah would have been nice to have an absurdflow setup but the logistics of leaving my car out there and somehow getting a ride back, plus other stuff would have been a hassle, but then I guess I wouldn't be waiting 6 months. Oh well..... Plus, this is a bit unique and I don't think Rob is making any more manifolds where the absurdflow is getting played out. Just kidding. I pretty sure that your mani is better on spool/powerband, but this build is a bit different.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #13  
brgracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
From: Ambler, PA
Default

More details in the future as everything but the turbo setup is kind of in the air at the moment, but basically:

Built 1.6L bottom end, worked head/aftermarket cams, Flipside Customs SS mani/DP, Garrett 2871 with a T3 housing option that is supposedly comparable to their T2 housing with 0.64A/R. I went T3 housing b/c the mani was T3 flanged and the v-band housing option only came with a T3 housing from ATP. Lots of other goodies on the car. I think the flow limiting factor here will be the stock intake manifold, but hopefully I will address that before the car is all together as well. When all is said and done, I'm hoping to run 18-20psi of boost .
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 07:32 PM
  #14  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by paul
I'm not worried.
We'll see what my stock motor does soon enough.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #15  
mikef85's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 0
From: South of Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by paul
I'm not worried.
Neither am I, but mine isn't quite apples to apples either.

Never the less, that looks sick dude. Looking foward to see it come together.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #16  
urgaynknowit's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,116
Total Cats: 0
From: worcester ma
Default

i creamed my pants just now, that mani is pretty
and the dp looks awsome.

we need some on motor shots
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #17  
Oscar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

turbo not hit block?

j/k
looks great
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #18  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

How come that is the manifold design I most often see on Hondas?
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #19  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01
How come that is the manifold design I most often see on Hondas?
Looks cool? Works a lot better than a log manifold? Relatively easy to build?
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #20  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
Looks cool? Works a lot better than a log manifold? Relatively easy to build?

top-end.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.