Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Used PT Cruiser Turbo

Old Mar 11, 2016 | 09:44 PM
  #1  
kenhoyt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Total Cats: -4
Default Used PT Cruiser Turbo

A friend gave me a good PT Cruiser turbo, metal lines, nothing else. Can this be adapted to my 1993 Miata 1.6 motor. Thanks in advance for any help.
Reply
Leave a poscat -4 Leave a negcat
Old Mar 11, 2016 | 09:50 PM
  #2  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by kenhoyt
A friend gave me a good PT Cruiser turbo, metal lines, nothing else. Can this be adapted to my 1993 Miata 1.6 motor. Thanks in advance for any help.
Anything is possible given unlimited time and money. You should have asked if it was a good match.
Old Mar 11, 2016 | 11:12 PM
  #3  
Twibs415's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 114
Default

you could choose any turbo yet you want to use one from possibly the car ever made.
Old Mar 11, 2016 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
deezums's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 206
From: Kansas
Default

I googled pt cruiser turbo for the lolz....

I got more than I bargained for



Yeah bro, that will fit.
Attached Thumbnails Used PT Cruiser Turbo-tu%2520pt%2520turbofold%2520tu%2520fade.jpg  
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 12:47 AM
  #5  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

I have a great idea.
Put that turbo in the green bin on your curb.
Then research this forum which holds a pleathora of turbos that bolt right up on miatas.
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 12:52 AM
  #6  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I wish I could ban people from breathing
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 01:08 AM
  #7  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I wish I could ban people from breathing
Isn't that what the KGB is for?
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 09:39 AM
  #8  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

lol, a turbo so small they only run it on 2-cly.
Old Mar 12, 2016 | 09:45 AM
  #9  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

No studs to stretch.
Old Mar 13, 2016 | 03:08 PM
  #10  
discontinuuity's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 35
Total Cats: -1
From: Denver, CO
Default

Easy: all you have to do is learn how to weld cast iron.
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 09:48 AM
  #11  
NBoost's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 153
Total Cats: -84
From: Canton, GA
Default

Leave it to Chrysler, they would.
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 12:32 PM
  #12  
x_25's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,822
Total Cats: 144
From: NorthWest NJ
Default

That is a really slick manifold/wastegate/turbine return combo thing though. I like it.
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 01:45 PM
  #13  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by x_25
That is a really slick manifold/wastegate/turbine return combo thing though. I like it.
you would.


it's horrendous. The only thing that's nice is the wastegate, the rest is lame.
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 01:48 PM
  #14  
x_25's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,822
Total Cats: 144
From: NorthWest NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
you would.


it's horrendous. The only thing that's nice is the wastegate, the rest is lame.
As an ease of manufacture/stock part, it is an interesting solution to making a realiable, simple, low boost setup. If you actually eant to go fast, yeah, it sucks (or rather, won't blow).
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 01:56 PM
  #15  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

i mean it did do a great job bringing the output from 150hp to 180hp...
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 02:10 PM
  #16  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

they're actually quite potent for what they are.
skittle owners beat them like redheaded stepchilds and they just keep on truckin, making tons of midrange torque and impressive power for how little they are.
240/300+ iirc on a basic pump gas setup
..and they spool at basically idle on the 2.4L

..but none of this makes up for how tarded OP is

Last edited by 18psi; Mar 16, 2016 at 10:51 AM.
Old Mar 16, 2016 | 10:30 AM
  #17  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

That manifold/turbo is different than than the srt4, irrc. I'd have to confirm that. The motor is for sure, like a wrx vs sti.
Old Mar 16, 2016 | 01:14 PM
  #18  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
That manifold/turbo is different than than the srt4, irrc. I'd have to confirm that. The motor is for sure, like a wrx vs sti.
Nope. Engine/turbo/exhaust mani is same as SRT-4. Intake mani and manual transmission are different (trans in PT is stronger than trans in SRT).

This thread is now about turbo PT Cruisers.

First video, VS my brother's 2000 M Roadster:

https://goo.gl/photos/kGc1G7tTrZ3ZhcoQA

Second video, VS new (at the time) 2009 WRX.

https://goo.gl/photos/4BCuWJmqEfQ2CJXq8

In both of these videos, the car had a 3" exhaust and a canned tune on a Diablosport Predator -- that's it.

Loved that stupid car.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Mar 16, 2016 | 01:45 PM
  #19  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I thought that was only in the "high output" model.

I read about it like 10 years ago, so im probably wrong.

but I was under the impression that the regular turbo model that was only like 180hp had the same motor as the n/a. And the "high output" 220hp had the upgraded srt4 motor with beefy rods and such.
Old Mar 16, 2016 | 01:49 PM
  #20  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

the regular Turbo model (the 'Touring') had exactly the same hardware as the GT. Literally identical. If you did the Mopar Stage 1 tune on both cars, they ended up in exactly the same place. It was dumb.

Difference was, the Touring was available only in an automatic, and not available with the autostick function. And those autos were known for going kablooie, even at stock GT power levels.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.