Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

When is this turbo good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #1  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default When is this turbo good?

So i am still looking for turbo options. When is this turbine A/R actually necessary for desired power?

Its a matter if i hold onto it ($375 for a new GT turbo is too good of a deal) and save it for later project. Or if I adjust my manifold and dp around it.

At what power level with this turbo, would the A/R be useful.


Oh heres the specs off the turbo

Compressor
In: 1.83"
Ex: 2.638"
A/R: .60


Turbine
In:2.083"
Ex:1.824"
A/R: .80


Pictures
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/sho...2&postcount=66

Specs off the Tag:
JIM025579
1901098000
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #2  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

i wanna say it looks like a super 60, but im not sure, your pics are the suck, lol
looks like a nice unit
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the turbine is a tiny bit smaller than a standard T3 but the compressor wheel is larger.

would be good on a 5.0L

this would be a good time to have a turbine map. For example, the 3071, which has a 2.3" turbine and .86 A/R housing would be most efficient flowing around 23 lb/min.

you 1.6L flows about 197.88 CFM at redline or 13.67 lb/min....
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
Arkmage's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,895
Total Cats: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by whaaamx5
i wanna say it looks like a super 60, but im not sure, your pics are the suck, lol
looks like a nice unit
Specs tell me it's not a T3, didn't bother looking at the pics. Specs seem like they are from a large T2 frame.
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #5  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

So the turbine:

Is 76 trim, 53mm with a .80 A/R, the closest turbine map is going to be from the GT2860R

GT2860R: 76 trim, 53.5mm with a .86 A/R

I would say the 0.5mm difference is negliable and could be a error in measurement.
0.5 mm 0.0196850394 in
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #6  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

So heres what were dealing with

Old Jan 29, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #7  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

**** me. I just went through the numbers this thing is basically a GT2871
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #8  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

or technically a 2867
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 04:08 PM
  #9  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
or technically a 2867
Yeah but for 375? **** me. Ill never get a housing.
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #10  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
or technically a 2867
So im thinking i might spool a little faster, and since i have a slightly smaller compressor. This might be a good turbo. Time to talk to begi
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #11  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

i mean if you could find a smaller housing....it looks like it should perform between a 2860RS and a 2871.
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #12  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

That was supposed to be A/R
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #13  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Looks like im using this turbo. My gt2867... yaaayy
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #14  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

cool! should be insteresting
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #15  
Loki047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

I hope so. Tiny motor large turbo. Shouldn't be too bad.... for $570 total i cant complain

Ill post dyno shots (hopefully in a month or 2) when i decide if i am doing water injection or I/C or both
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satisfied
MEGAsquirt
144
Nov 5, 2018 04:05 PM
Tekel
Cars for sale/trade
29
Feb 5, 2016 04:16 PM
PaperMate
Insert BS here
32
Sep 25, 2015 08:22 AM
ProjectDDoS
Build Threads
1
Sep 9, 2015 01:52 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.