Notices

1.6L - T3 ChinaTarder on MS3X 236hp/235tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #41  
underdog's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 203
Total Cats: 12
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Since I drive the car as a DD, for the most part, having more low-end torque is much more enjoyable than useless top-end, especially when I don't want to breach 250rwhp. So a larger turbo will have less low-end grunt and a smaller underpowered powerband.
Well said and good to know. I needed talked out of fixing something that ain't broke. It's not typically in my nature to futz with things that are working perfectly, especially when I'm not too keen on getting to the point of breaking driveline components. It's just too damn tempting with these cheap turbos. Thanks again for the info.
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #42  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

My problem is I drive a bunch of local 1.8L setups that make massive TQ down low and it's just so much fun. While having top-end has it's benefits as well, I personally like to max out as much as the curve as I possible can within my ceiling.

I've always been making around 230-240 for years and years, but this is the best the car has ever felt since I'm making over 40 more rear wheel torque at 4K. I might have sacrificed some power over 6K, but I'm hardly up that high and I'm not drag racing either.
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 07:37 PM
  #43  
rbluemx6's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 178
Total Cats: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

You don't want too much torque down low. My FE3T setup made 290 ft/lbs around 4300 rpms and fell flat after that with only 265 hp to hold it up. The tune needed alot of work but it was running out of fuel. It wasn't very fun to drive because I would hit peak power really quick and still have 3000 rpms to go on a curve that took a nose dive. I blame it on the tune though.
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #44  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
My problem is I drive a bunch of local 1.8L setups that make massive TQ down low and it's just so much fun. While having top-end has it's benefits as well, I personally like to max out as much as the curve as I possible can within my ceiling.

I've always been making around 230-240 for years and years, but this is the best the car has ever felt since I'm making over 40 more rear wheel torque at 4K. I might have sacrificed some power over 6K, but I'm hardly up that high and I'm not drag racing either.
Lowend torque is great.
Makes the car feel like a small v8, so easy and effortless acceleration.
If you daily the car and rarely "stretch its legs" so to speak, its hands down a winner.
I'm honestly surprised you haven't gone 1.8 ages ago. They're really cheap and easy, and you of all people could pull off a swap in a weeknight.

Since you replaced your shortblock what like 3 times now? Why haven't you upgraded all this time?

No replacement for displacement
Originally Posted by rbluemx6
You don't want too much torque down low. My FE3T setup made 290 ft/lbs around 4300 rpms and fell flat after that with only 265 hp to hold it up. The tune needed alot of work but it was running out of fuel. It wasn't very fun to drive because I would hit peak power really quick and still have 3000 rpms to go on a curve that took a nose dive. I blame it on the tune though.
Unless you plummeted your timing and went pig rich up top for some insanely retarded reason, I highly doubt it was all about your tune.
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #45  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Probably never swapped because he always had another bottom end ready to go. The current one was out of my old car when I swapped in the semi built motor that I pwnt after the dyno day if I remember correctly. His was on its last leg with mysteriously disappearing oil, rican style, and I just happened to be getting rid of a good to go bottom end.
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #46  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
Probably never swapped because he always had another bottom end ready to go. The current one was out of my old car when I swapped in the semi built motor that I pwnt after the dyno day if I remember correctly. His was on its last leg with mysteriously disappearing oil, rican style, and I just happened to be getting rid of a good to go bottom end.
You also left out the part where scott is a jew and is to cheap to buy a 1.8 manifold and downpipe.
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #47  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Yes, I do even recall him saying words almost like that as well. Probably even using that very adjective.
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 08:44 AM
  #48  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Took the words right out of my mouth he did. I got more important things to spend money on...like welfare checks.
Old Dec 27, 2010 | 09:28 PM
  #49  
Clos561's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 725
Total Cats: 5
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Default

how much power you guys think i can get form t his turbo? i bought the same one and i have a 99. looking to be boosted within the next 2 months or so.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darthteddy
DIY Turbo Discussion
11
Jan 1, 2014 07:56 AM
t2couger
MEGAsquirt
2
Dec 17, 2013 10:32 AM
tottestad
Miata parts for sale/trade
38
Aug 14, 2013 08:09 PM
tplociniak
MEGAsquirt
0
Jul 31, 2012 06:57 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.