Notices

new numbers!

Old Oct 1, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #21  
airbrush1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,038
Total Cats: 9
From: Baltimore Maryland
Default

ok, I'm an idiot, don't know how I managed that one!

PS, yeah, view new posts is the best button evar!
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #22  
Mymiataflys's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 172
Total Cats: 1
Default

numbers like that make me wish I had two turbo miatas, one with a full exhaust/cat, quieter intake, and say a t25. Then one with a super 60, external wastegate dumping to atmoshere, full 3 inch exhaust, no cat etc.
nice numbers, enjoy
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #23  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

dont feel bad. every time I want to post a new thread it takes me five minutes to realize I can't do it from "new posts".
Old Oct 3, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #24  
mazda/nissan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,075
Total Cats: 0
From: Lexington, SC
Default

Originally Posted by airbrush1
http://turboneticsinc.com/products/i...category_id=75

that's the turbo according to my serial number

haven't been able to find any compressor maps for it however

oooo ... cheap i like :gay:

nice numbers too by the way
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 11:59 PM
  #25  
beerslurpy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 312
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'm curious how you got the torque to hold flat till redline at a constant manifold pressure. Usually it dips off a lot, especially the T04Bs that have very narrow efficient ranges with sharp dropoffs. Those are really high numbers for 13 psi on a crappy turbo like that, even with a good ECU like a TEC.

Your first dyno looks a lot more representative of a normal miata dyno chart with the puke and die around 5500. I am curious what mods you did between the 260 and 290hp runs.

Also, are those corrected figures?

I had a T04B-S3 not a V trim. The V trim is a slightly higher flowing turbo if I remember correctly.
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 12:10 AM
  #26  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the stage II turbine will flow better, and that compressor wheel is good for 53 lb/min or 473BHP.

there's the clear benefits of a large turbo in it's glory.
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #27  
airbrush1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,038
Total Cats: 9
From: Baltimore Maryland
Default

Mods between..... De-catted the car, changed the drivers side UICP to 2.25"
and a new downpipe.

If you look at the numbers in the first dyno sheet, you'll see that the blue line on the left side actually holds till redline.

The numbers are uncorrected to the best of my knowledge. We are at sea level, so I don't see the need for much of a correction factor.
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #28  
miatex's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

Airbrush, is your car a 1.6?

miatex
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #29  
airbrush1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,038
Total Cats: 9
From: Baltimore Maryland
Default

No the car is a 2000 NB 1.8L
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
elesjuan
Build Threads
7
Nov 3, 2015 01:51 PM
compuw22c
MEGAsquirt
4
Sep 12, 2015 07:42 PM
Neddy
Engine Performance
0
Sep 10, 2015 09:42 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 5, 2015 08:02 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.