Notices

Trackspeed Engineering/ABUSRDflow - GT2871R, E85, 1.9L 8.6:1 - 351whp/294tq/17psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 01:48 PM
  #1  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default Trackspeed Engineering/ABUSRDflow - GT2871R, E85, 1.9L 8.6:1 - 351whp/294tq/17psi

Name:  boostasE85-351whp.jpg
Views: 363
Size:  120.5 KB

Red and green lines are my last trip at 14psi on 100 octane. Baseline was ~330whp at 14psi after setting up the fuel map for E85.

The next restriction is starting to show itself. The torque is phenomenal but it's dropping off faster at 17psi than it did at 14psi before. I'm thinking cams and headwork are next on the list to prop that up. I also need to get a different boost gauge as well as an EGT sensor, just to see how comically low the EGTs are. I'm expecting ~1300 degrees.

I'm very happy with the results. I would have liked to get more boost but my MBC was acting up and I didn't want to waste time and money futzing with it. As it sits 380whp should be easy at 22-23psi. The torque curve is just phenomenal, essentially peak torque available from 4200rpm to 6200rpm.

Timing is approximately 20 degrees at 17psi. I did a pull at 22 degrees and lost power. 19 degrees was ~345whp.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #2  
jbrown7815's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 831
Total Cats: 2
From: Portales, NM
Default

Awesome. I'd like to go E-85 some day. I'm only a mile from a station with it.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #3  
jtothawhat's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,376
Total Cats: 4
From: Chicagoland
Default

Was this done on ID1000's? If so, what was your duty cycle?
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #4  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

This is with the VVT doing its job, right? that's pretty awesome "low end torque" for that motor.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #5  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

190 ft/lb at 3K, yeah, it's got good low end I'd say.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 02:42 PM
  #6  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Same VVT settings as before, yep. I think its 200tq at 3500rom, those straight lines are funky. Not sure if they are part of the chart or a dyno burp.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #7  
WonTon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

that is awesome, i need some of that in my life!
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 02:49 PM
  #8  
Bond's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

I can feel the torque through the computer screen.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #9  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

Shazaaam!

Stock cam and head?
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 06:06 PM
  #10  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

100% untouched cams and head.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #11  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
The torque is phenomenal but it's dropping off faster at 17psi than it did at 14psi before. I'm thinking cams and headwork are next on the list to prop that up.
Your power is already flat from 6300-7200 RPM. I don't think you'll benefit from cams unless you raise the revlimit.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #12  
matthewdesigns's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,648
Total Cats: 55
From: WNC
Default

Congrats on the new numbers using e85. I love the stuff, glad to see it helped make such a difference with your setup. Your car must be a ******* riot to drive lol!
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #13  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Hey next time you're in NJ I want to borrow your car for a few, if you don't mind.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 10:38 PM
  #14  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Congrats on power. That's awesome.
Old Jul 24, 2010 | 10:56 PM
  #15  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Fantastic
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 07:45 AM
  #16  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

God that is the power I want. Same low end power that my 2554 had but a shitton of more top end.
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #17  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

where did you experience detonation? I like to have at least 4* retard from detonation. I know you hit MBT...but what about headroom from detonation? I vote take at least 4* out considering how we drive these cars.
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #18  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

So I hate you for your early spool and flat torque curve between 4200-6000. You are hitting peak torque 800 rpm before I am. What do you attribute the early spool to? Tuning/fuel map, absurdflowage, IM, VVT, all the above? It does not seem to be the fuel judging by your comparison plot.
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #19  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by zx-tex
so i hate you for your early spool and flat torque curve between 4200-6000. You are hitting peak torque 800 rpm before i am. What do you attribute the early spool to? Tuning/fuel map, absurdflowage, im, vvt, all the above? It does not seem to be the fuel judging by your comparison plot.
af.
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #20  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

probably the combination of all the hardware, though I can vouch for VVT being responsible for 500 rpm of spool improvement by itself.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.