200hp on N/A engine?
That engine you can pick up for $400-$500.
That turbo kit which did 275rwhp/262ftlbs that day after tuning will run you $3000 with full 3" exhaust from the turbo back and 18x12x3 core FMIC
Other costs like ECU, injectors, clutch you will will need anyway for your NA build.
Wanna buy one?
That turbo kit which did 275rwhp/262ftlbs that day after tuning will run you $3000 with full 3" exhaust from the turbo back and 18x12x3 core FMIC
Other costs like ECU, injectors, clutch you will will need anyway for your NA build.
Wanna buy one?
hehehe... my motor is in the shop and im building a '01 short block w/ '99 head. ill post back in few weeks when everything is together and car goes off to tuner.
Yeah, I'd still rather drive one of the EVOs. The graphs are skewed for the high revs of the Honda.
Then again I've never driven an S2000. I got tired of having to wring the **** out of my Integra to get anywhere, but the S2000 is probably a different animal all together.
Then again I've never driven an S2000. I got tired of having to wring the **** out of my Integra to get anywhere, but the S2000 is probably a different animal all together.
how are the graphs skewed? They are proportionate. What it does illustrate is that two cars with the same peak HP can be two totally different machines. It also illustrates that small N/A motors sucks.
As an official mt.net act: I declare raven21 a n00b and suggest he stop posting.
As an official mt.net act: I declare raven21 a n00b and suggest he stop posting.
how are the graphs skewed? They are proportionate. What it does illustrate is that two cars with the same peak HP can be two totally different machines. It also illustrates that small N/A motors sucks.
As an official mt.net act: I declare raven21 a n00b and suggest he stop posting.
As an official mt.net act: I declare raven21 a n00b and suggest he stop posting.
To me, that is what peaky is, not making any power until WAAAAY up there. I thought you were trying to argue that the Honda was a "steady beast." I think we are trying to say the same thing, but from different points of view and with different terminology.
I too would much rather have a turbo 4 with torque all over the place than the stretched out powerband of the Honda. This is why I pointed out how important the area under the curve was, not for you, but for the less educated, like supernoob here.
I second the act.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







