Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Air/Oil Separator Filling Up Too Fast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2018 | 01:49 PM
  #61  
Joker's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 333
Total Cats: 38
From: Sixshooter's Basement
Default

Old Aug 27, 2018 | 03:05 PM
  #62  
Landrew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,193
Total Cats: 29
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
I have tried a few things, nothing I've been 100% happy with. IIRC there is a correlation between the velocity of the escaping gases and the ability for those gases to hold oil in suspension (the faster the airflow, the more oil comes out). Since the pressure should be fairly constant at WOT, increasing the orifices should reduce the velocity and help that oil fall out of suspension, but I suspect there's more at play than just that, based on the differences I've seen between 94-00 and 01-05s.

I think my current best practice is to open up the passage between the center and left baffles, run a slightly larger hose (-8 or -10) to a Radium AOS, then drain it back to the pan through a large check valve. The Radium AOS should do a good enough job that you shouldn't need to worry about routing the vacuum-side hose back to the turbo intake (via venturi), which I want to do to reduce the blowby smell at WOT (it's, um, substantial at 400whp).
With a VVT cover is this above best practice applicable as well? I have the cover off now and should I drill the VVT crossover baffle port larger and pull out the drivers side bung so i can drill it larger then insert some -8 or -10 AN fittings then also plug the PCV line?
This is what Im gathering after many hours of tracking down good intel. I trust your judgement here.
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 04:30 PM
  #63  
Mudflap's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 468
Total Cats: 87
From: Louisville, Co
Default

Yes, I just drilled out the first hole (from that center passage to driver side passage) to a much larger size, then did it again with another hole next to it. Was pretty easy to do with just a drill and a steady hand. Otherwise that pathway is severely restricted.

Then I pulled the small port (drivers side) and replaced with the largest NPT (I think I fit 3/8" NPT, don't quote me) and used a 3/8" NPT to -10an fitting.

You may want to plug that passenger side port, or, if you are pushing a ton of air past your rings, go ahead and use that port to feed into the same oil/air filter and port to air or back into your oil pan (your choice).

I agree with Sav on this one. Bigger will always be better. Don't have super high pressure (oily) gases in small diameter hoses for this.
Old Aug 29, 2018 | 06:46 PM
  #64  
Landrew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,193
Total Cats: 29
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Default

I drilled out the drivers side so I could JB weld in an almost 1/2" or 12.4mm to be more exact ID brass push on fitting. The original ID was 7.2mm so it will flow quite a bit more. I forget my cross sectional flow math but it's 75% bigger by width. Also drilled out the existing baffle orifice.
Old Oct 9, 2018 | 01:39 PM
  #65  
Landrew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,193
Total Cats: 29
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Default

Engine is running stronger than evernow that it's back together but I haven't done a recent compression test.
When I am testing feeling the new enlarged single breather port I can feel the air pulsing and a good amount coming out at a fast warmup idle

No oil so far just moist warm air that accumulates clear water.
I've never felt valve cover ventilation so I have no reference to go by.

What is normal for the amount of air volume to vent?

Old Dec 4, 2019 | 02:02 PM
  #66  
Leon's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: 0
Default

I am currently installing a heated radium AOS. Are there any pictures of it installed? I suppose the drain hose should be vertically to the oil pan somehow.
Old Dec 4, 2019 | 02:11 PM
  #67  
matrussell122's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,861
Total Cats: 517
From: Seattle
Default


Old Dec 5, 2019 | 08:44 AM
  #68  
Leon's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: 0
Default

Blended in nicely! Are you using a check valve on the return line, or it is mounted low inside the oil area as savington mentioned in previous post?
Old Dec 5, 2019 | 12:11 PM
  #69  
matrussell122's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,861
Total Cats: 517
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by Leon
Blended in nicely! Are you using a check valve on the return line, or it is mounted low inside the oil area as savington mentioned in previous post?
Thats a car that savington built. He has the return below oil level. I was going to have mine return above oil level because thats what Radium said to do.
Old Jan 26, 2020 | 09:58 AM
  #70  
rallysquirrel's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 8
Total Cats: 0
From: Clifton Park, NY
Default

DELETED

Last edited by rallysquirrel; Jan 26, 2020 at 07:44 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longnose92
General Miata Chat
2
Aug 25, 2019 04:21 PM
jspadaro
General Miata Chat
11
Apr 13, 2016 06:41 AM
Calmdown
Engine Performance
14
Dec 10, 2014 09:27 AM
Rushin
General Miata Chat
50
Jul 31, 2009 06:24 PM
miataspeed1point6
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
15
Oct 2, 2006 08:49 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 PM.