Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Air/Oil Separator Filling Up Too Fast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2018, 10:54 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
germanmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Cologne
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by matrussell122
So right no on my VVT motor i have a -10 fitting welded about 2" back from the oil fill and one where the pcv was. If i cap the pcv and run the hose from the top of the cover to the can then back into the pan i should be good. Where should i send the oil back into the pan since im welding oil pan drain fittings right now on the bench.
You wont get any flow. Pan and Valvecover are connected... If u have to much problems with liquid blowby just cap the pcv site and just run the exhaust side port.
germanmiata is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 10:58 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

Originally Posted by germanmiata
You wont get any flow. Pan and Valvecover are connected... If u have to much problems with liquid blowby just cap the pcv site and just run the exhaust side port.
That first part is wrong. I just dis a 5 min google search and Sav has a sound setup. Its actually really really sweet.


Sav: I assume i should have it drain above oil level. Probably opposite side of the turbo drain?
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 11:19 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
germanmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Cologne
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by matrussell122
That first part is wrong. I just dis a 5 min google search and Sav has a sound setup. Its actually really really sweet.


Sav: I assume i should have it drain above oil level. Probably opposite side of the turbo drain?
Maybe i got you wrong. Do you mean with "the can then back into the pan" the oil and not the gases?
germanmiata is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 11:49 PM
  #24  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by matrussell122
Sav: I assume i should have it drain above oil level. Probably opposite side of the turbo drain?
Nope. Drain it below oil level or you've just created another large orifice for blowby to escape, and no oil will actually drain. The drain needs to be submerged in oil at all times (even under high cornering loads), or you need to run a check valve to prevent blowby flowing up the drain when the oil sloshes in the pan. The MSM does the former, I do the latter on my AOS installs.
Savington is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 11:51 PM
  #25  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by germanmiata
You wont get any flow. Pan and Valvecover are connected
You will get flow if you submerge the drain in oil.
Savington is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 12:02 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

So if i was a smart cookie i would submerge as low as possible and run a check valve in the line
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 01:01 AM
  #27  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
thumpetto007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,041
Total Cats: -117
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
If you vent the PCV-side port at WOT, you will get liquid oil no matter how healthy the motor is.

The correct method for running a catch can is one hose from the driver's side port only. The passenger side (PCV) port should be plugged or capped entirely.
HOOOOOOLY **** this explains so much.

Just to clarify, i plumb the drivers side valve cover port to the vented catch can, and then to the port on intake pipe. Is that correct?

And the intake manifold tube gets capped as wrll as the pcv valve port?

Im very dumb, and i just want to make sure Im understanding this.
thumpetto007 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 01:03 AM
  #28  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

Thats my understanding as well. It looks like on the website you can also just run a filter instead of going to the intake pipe.
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 09:22 AM
  #29  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Pintobeantoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Total Cats: -4
Default

Originally Posted by germanmiata
I think the problem is the hole from the middle baffle to the pcv side. If the oil condensate in the pcv baffle it cant run backwards because the aslope hole and the rtv seal to the bottom. The only way out is through the pcv port. My idea is to run rtv not all the way but steel wool in the baffles. I will post some pics tomorrow in my build thread

a friend in the MSP community said that they stuff steel wool in their baffles to help with this! I feel like the best setup will pull from both sides, just need baffling to allow for that
Pintobeantoes is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 09:51 AM
  #30  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

I currently have copper scrubbers stuffed in there and it works however i will be switching to a Radium AOS on the new motor. PM me and i can ship you my current setup
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 10:13 AM
  #31  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Pintobeantoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Total Cats: -4
Default

I too have a copper scrubby in my AOS, but what we are talking about is actually fitting scrubby into the baffled area for the PCV on the valve cover

on that note, perhaps the escort or protege valve covers offer a more optimized design? Does anybody know if the baffling on the other valve covers are any better?
Pintobeantoes is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 01-09-2018, 10:39 AM
  #32  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Pintobeantoes
I too have a copper scrubby in my AOS, but what we are talking about is actually fitting scrubby into the baffled area for the PCV on the valve cover

on that note, perhaps the escort or protege valve covers offer a more optimized design? Does anybody know if the baffling on the other valve covers are any better?
I have scrubbers in my valve cover ya ding-a-ling.

Sav is one of the best if not the best turbo miata engine builder. He know what he is talking about and straight up said in the thread the proper way to catch can.
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 10:47 AM
  #33  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Pintobeantoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Total Cats: -4
Default

Haha just wanted to clarify! Well i ask questions with no intention to stamp on the feet of those who flattened the path in the first place, much thanks to sav for the details on the proper routing.
Pintobeantoes is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 01-09-2018, 12:36 PM
  #34  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Pintobeantoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Total Cats: -4
Default


Heres a photo of the setup. I added the breather to the top of the AOS. Still no scrubby in the valve cover. Going to test for 100 miles and report back. I suspect it won't fill up nearly as fast, although still not ideal.
Pintobeantoes is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 12:38 PM
  #35  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

hey *******: https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...ighlight=catch
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 12:47 PM
  #36  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Pintobeantoes
Heres a photo of the setup. I added the breather to the top of the AOS. Still no scrubby in the valve cover. Going to test for 100 miles and report back. I suspect it won't fill up nearly as fast, although still not ideal.

DUDE seriously you have been spoon fed knowledge on how to do this and been told that yours wont work. There even is a huge thread that got attached that thoroughly discuses this.
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 01:04 PM
  #37  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
thumpetto007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,041
Total Cats: -117
Default

"cap the pcv valve port" proceeds to keep it connected...

i literally got up this morning, and drove to napa for caps.

You will still get the same amount of oil, since you arentsupposed to connect that side (not sure why, but more knowledgeable people told me to do it)
thumpetto007 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 01:56 PM
  #38  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

I was at the track with someone who had a turbo car, '99 head/VC, and both VC ports routed to a catch can. They were having issues with the can filling up. I told them to cut the hose between the PCV and the catch can and stick a bolt in each end. They did it, suddenly their catch can was not filling with oil.

Must have been a coincidence.
Savington is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 02:12 PM
  #39  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

he should also remove the turbo blanket, and reinstall the lower pan.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 02:14 PM
  #40  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Pintobeantoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Total Cats: -4
Default

Sigh.. so much upset for wanting to collect data! As previously stated, I'm not arguing against Sav, and have graciously thanked him and whoever else has done the previous research into this. Cool your jets!

as for my plan and intention for replying.. i will go with the photographed setup for 100 miles to see how it compares to before, the same without a catch can breather. Anyone wanna bet it has the exact same? More? Less?

after 100 miles, ill just cap the PCV port. Ill run it with the can vented and measure. Then remove the filter and run it sealed to the turbo inlet and measure. Not that i expect to find contradictory information, its just numbers for the books so I cam better make sense of things.

sorry for not blindly accepting what others say, a questioning skeptical mind you could say
Pintobeantoes is offline  


Quick Reply: Air/Oil Separator Filling Up Too Fast



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.