Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Build: VVT and JRSC in 93 NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 03:34 AM
  #41  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

There are two issues here:

1) Fueling
2) Timing

Fueling: The VVT engine needs more fuel across the board than the 1.6. At some RPM/Load areas, it will require significantly more (ie near the redline), in some areas less than that. With a stock 1.6 ECU and a pressure regulator, you won't be able to make the fueling right. You will be very rich in some areas and very lean in others. And since something tells me that you won't even install a wideband, you won't even know, but you will be happy in your ignorance.

Timing: The stock 1.6 ECU commands more timing than the stock 1.8 w/VVT ECU. Add the supercharger (which significantly raises the IAT) and the boost it provides, and you now have a recipe for certain detonation. You need to be able to pull timing somehow, and there's no easy/cheap way to do it with a VVT engine.
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 08:46 AM
  #42  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Wonder if blow-through carbs wouldn't be easier and safer...
Chop the FW a bit and add a distro as well.

Those electronics are scary...
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 09:04 AM
  #43  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
Wonder if blow-through carbs wouldn't be easier and safer...

Those electronics are scary...
The dying art is almost dead.
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 09:33 AM
  #44  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by pakron1122
Anyway, gasoline burns best at a certain ratio, say 14.7:1. Adding more air via a supercharger throws off the ratio, which you must add more fuel to compensate. Now, I can do that mechanically with fuel delivery. The curve may not be exact, as the 1.6 ecu is expecting certain things at certain rpms which are now off. But you can get it close enough. So that is my thinking. Is that not correct?
The curve is going to suck ***. it'll be either lean before 5.5K so it's not too rich after 5.5K. or it'll be rich before 5.5K and then HELLA SUPER DUPER rich at 5.5K and then you'll wash out your ringlands and blow the motor.
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 10:46 AM
  #45  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by pakron1122
My plan is to use the stock 1.6 ecu.
You're in the running for the prestigious "retard of the year" award.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
konmo
MEGAsquirt
22
Nov 5, 2015 02:32 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
7
Sep 24, 2015 03:50 PM
curly
MEGAsquirt
11
Sep 22, 2015 11:54 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 PM.