Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Highest hp 1.6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
FastColt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 271
Total Cats: 0
From: CT
Default Highest hp 1.6?

Did a search, couldn't turn anything up. Curious who has the highest horse power 1.6 out there. Or the fastest (1/4 mile time) out of a 1.6. Thanks!
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #2  
Cspence's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,065
Total Cats: 1
From: Meriden, CT
Default

Heard you were going to be shooting for some big numbers...can't wait to see what you come up with
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
FastColt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 271
Total Cats: 0
From: CT
Default

We'll see... Ive got a radiator and and fans if you want it. Carl told me you might need it.
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
chriscar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,709
Total Cats: 16
From: Carrollton TX
Default

HAH! I was watching video's on Matt Farah's (of Garage 419 fame) new site, The Smoking Tire, and knew I had seen that white Miata with red wheels somewhere before. You're famous now.

The Smoking Tire - Part 3



C
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
Cspence's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,065
Total Cats: 1
From: Meriden, CT
Default

Originally Posted by FastColt
We'll see... Ive got a radiator and and fans if you want it. Carl told me you might need it.
I should be good (I've got a custom one in there so it'd be counter productive to go to a stocker..), if you have some motivation bottled up I'll take that, lol. My rad just has like a small pin hole in it....the shop over on west main (Perreaults) said they could do their thing for like $50, I just have to get off my fat *** and take that **** out already....
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:50 PM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Corksport hit 400rwhp with a 1.6L...didnt last very long, it was a stock motor.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
buffon01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Corksport hit 400rwhp with a 1.6L...didnt last very long, it was a stock motor.
Holy ****!! O_O
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #8  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

yeah 1.6's are good for 300-400 just like anything else. They are strong the only limits are on your cashpool
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #9  
FastColt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 271
Total Cats: 0
From: CT
Default

Is there a write up anywhere about the corksport build?
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #10  
buffon01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
It's never personal, it's the interweb. Dont correct my spelling ever again; I could write a book regarding your bad grammar. lol
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #11  
1slowna's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
From: Palm Harbor FL
Default

Stock motor holding 400whp?
This tells me that 300whp can be done and done reliably with the right tuning. I have a hunch that the bent and broken rods are due to the wasted spark setup on our cars, the dsm guys have the same issue at a lil higher power levels at 400whp they bend and break stock rods and at 550-600 or even less on e85 they are throwing eagles all day. I speculate that when you miss fire with wasted spark the fuel/air that is still in the cylinder gets ignited when the plug fires at bdc, the pistons is trying to come up against expanding gasses and the rod is at a terrible ratio with thew piston only half way up in the cylinder. Basically the same effect as detonation but at a point in the stroke where the force is put on the rod while it is at a sharp angle causing it to bend or break much easier then when it is nearly straight up and down. Once my custom manifold is done i will post up some numbers and see if i can change some peoples minds about the integrity of the stock rods. <all speculation, until i have done it or someone else has done it who knows maybe these rods really are only good for 250whp>
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #12  
zoomin's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
From: where most people are Utarded
Default

Ummm, funny how that kid thinks his non-lightened Miata with roughly 40-60lbs of extra turbo parts weighs just over 2k lbs. A full interior Miata with hardtop and a full turbo setup will weigh closer to 2340lbs. And that Kurt guy was the idiot who was always bragging up his rear mount setup on a few forums, yet never raced anyone.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #13  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by zoomin
Ummm, funny how that kid thinks his non-lightened Miata with roughly 40-60lbs of extra turbo parts weighs just over 2k lbs. A full interior Miata with hardtop and a full turbo setup will weigh closer to 2340lbs. And that Kurt guy was the idiot who was always bragging up his rear mount setup on a few forums, yet never raced anyone.
That "kid" you're talking about is TS
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #14  
FastColt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 271
Total Cats: 0
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by zoomin
Ummm, funny how that kid thinks his non-lightened Miata with roughly 40-60lbs of extra turbo parts weighs just over 2k lbs. A full interior Miata with hardtop and a full turbo setup will weigh closer to 2340lbs. And that Kurt guy was the idiot who was always bragging up his rear mount setup on a few forums, yet never raced anyone.
What makes you think my miata is non-lightend? I dont just say **** for no reason.....and since you've never seen my car....assumptions make and *** of ume?

1slowna great explanation, but i was talking about the 1.6 as a fully built engine, not stock rods. I guess i should have asked a different question.
Built bottom, fully built head with big cams...seems like theres not a lot of info out there.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 04:01 PM
  #15  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Why don't you do it and then we'll have a benchmark for the future
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #16  
Sentic's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 432
Total Cats: 5
From: Sweden
Default

I suppose you have seen this recent thread?
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/t40385/
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #17  
zoomin's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
From: where most people are Utarded
Default

Originally Posted by FastColt
What makes you think my miata is non-lightend? I dont just say **** for no reason.....and since you've never seen my car....assumptions make and *** of ume?

1slowna great explanation, but i was talking about the 1.6 as a fully built engine, not stock rods. I guess i should have asked a different question.
Built bottom, fully built head with big cams...seems like theres not a lot of info out there.
I have put together 3 of these and do sometimes have a clue of what I talk about. How about you show me where you got it down to a bit over 2000lbs and prove my assumption incorrect?? Thanks!
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #18  
FastColt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 271
Total Cats: 0
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by zoomin
I have put together 3 of these and do sometimes have a clue of what I talk about. How about you show me where you got it down to a bit over 2000lbs and prove my assumption incorrect?? Thanks!
I could show ya a pile of parts on my garage floor that are not in my car any more lol.

Good find Sentic, thank you very much!
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 05:55 PM
  #19  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by 1slowna
Stock motor holding 400whp?
This tells me that 300whp can be done and done reliably with the right tuning. I have a hunch that the bent and broken rods are due to the wasted spark setup on our cars, the dsm guys have the same issue at a lil higher power levels at 400whp they bend and break stock rods and at 550-600 or even less on e85 they are throwing eagles all day. I speculate that when you miss fire with wasted spark the fuel/air that is still in the cylinder gets ignited when the plug fires at bdc, the pistons is trying to come up against expanding gasses and the rod is at a terrible ratio with thew piston only half way up in the cylinder. Basically the same effect as detonation but at a point in the stroke where the force is put on the rod while it is at a sharp angle causing it to bend or break much easier then when it is nearly straight up and down. Once my custom manifold is done i will post up some numbers and see if i can change some peoples minds about the integrity of the stock rods. <all speculation, until i have done it or someone else has done it who knows maybe these rods really are only good for 250whp>
I have a feeling that something of what you are saying is correct. I dunno if the exmple is or what is causing the issue. I know that hondas run 300+whp on stock blocks often with good tunes because they can run larger turbos and maintain good spool because of ve. Their rods are very similar to ours in size, but they have a completely different ign system. They usually blow sleeves because of psi, not hp.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #20  
Sam Amporful's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 0
From: Macon, Ga
Default

A forged 1.6 can hold power just as well as the next engine. Its just less capable in the long run for more reasons than I feel like explaining.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.