Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Inconsistent fuel pressure & Radium pulse damper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2015 | 01:07 AM
  #41  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

I would agree, especially if it proves to work as good, or better, than the OEM damper.
Old Jul 2, 2015 | 11:04 AM
  #42  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
dampers need to be tuned to a specific fuel pressure.
--Ian
I'd say they operate properly within a spec'd operating range, not "tuned". My guess is some kind of expansion chamber bottoms out above that range.
Old Jul 4, 2015 | 12:44 AM
  #43  
Bravo_Thr33's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 0
From: Wyoming
Default

I'm still new to the whole Miata world, But FWIW over in the Evo X world we were facing some fuel pressure abnormalities a little while ago with after market fuel rails and AFPR's, which was exacerbated with larger injectors. around 2000-2200 RPMS, we would dangerously lean out with no real explanation despite having pleanty of pump to support high HP numbers (some guys were running twin 450 pumps and still having the issue). Turns out our OEM FPR's had dampers in them internally and when switching to AFPR's we were unintentionally removing them causing a weird resonance in the fuel rail that couldn't be tuned around. Some guys experimented with the Radium FPD and found it solved all tuning issues related to that 2000-2200 lean spot. The X platform is obviously highly different, as is the fuel system in that it uses a more tradition performance oriented Pump->Rail->FPR->Return setup, but we did have great success with the Radium FPD. We also found a solution to running big pumps at idle/no boost cruising but would still provide full power to the pumps when getting into boost, basically for the same reasons as stated earlier, over whelming the FPR for those running very large pumps (wally 450's in single and twin configurations, twin 320's, etc). It might be worth the little extra expense to swap your regulator to the return side and do the required plumbing, it might make tuning easier as well.
Old Aug 13, 2017 | 06:23 PM
  #44  
NwaR's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 24
Total Cats: 1
Default

Radium Engineering has added a fuel rail that can use their proprietary products including the better fuel pulse dampers to help smooth fuel delivery.

Old Aug 14, 2017 | 03:41 PM
  #45  
Der_Idiot's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,489
Total Cats: 29
From: Saint Paul, MN
Default

For what it is worth, I use the FPD-XR matched to manifold pressure with my FM BFFK at 60psi (matched to manifold) with the damper up at the end of the line right before the T for the two rail inlets. I haven't had any issues though I haven't been logging my fuel pressure. Interesting that there's a fuel rail available now though.
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 05:35 PM
  #46  
DaWaN's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 204
Total Cats: 29
From: Netherlands, Europe
Default

Here is a direct link to the fuel rail: Fuel Rail, Mazda MX-5
Looks like a nice piece and price is pretty reasonable at 140 dollars.
Unfortunately if I add the 4 ORB-8 fittings, import tax and shipping it ends up at 300 dollars at my doorstep, but that is still below the price of the Flyin' Miata one.

One thing I do not get: why is the thing not compatible with the '99-'00 USDM VICS manifold? As far as I know the VICS manifold is identical across all markets between '99-'00. We did not get the flattop either until '01.
I guess Radium does not know the rest of the world also had the VICS between '99-'00 or am I missing something here?
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 05:53 PM
  #47  
codrus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

My guess would be that they designed the rail for a specific car that had a specific manifold on it and didn't really think about other manifolds until too late. The 99 ViCS manifold has the least clearance of any of the NB manifolds, I think.

For those who might be reading this thread and wondering about the results, I did install the Radium damper and it did work. Results got posted in my build thread, but not cross-posted here. Link:

https://www.miataturbo.net/build-thr...5/#post1250082

--Ian
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Apr 21, 2016 03:00 PM
lsc224
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Oct 1, 2015 09:17 AM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
Sep 30, 2015 02:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.