Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Lean idle question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2010, 04:25 PM
  #21  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

I don't want to come across as a fear monger, but idling at 17:1 is likely producing significant amounts of NOx and poisoning us all.

get your car idling between 14.3 and 15 AFR.

though I also have to wonder if you're really idling at 17:1 due to the inability of the wideband to measure at low gas volume flow rates. anyone ever check it with a narrow band?
y8s is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:37 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
 
Sparetire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
Default

AFAIK cars are basically designed to idle at around stoich or a tad leaner. Certanly wont hurt anything.

I always found that richening things up a bit made for a smooth idle, but other than maybe a slight change in perceived NVH, no reason to run it rich at idle. I cant beleive people are ideling at 13:1. Dont most OEMs try to run like 20+ degrees of timinmg at idle too? Its much more efficient to run at stoich with around 20 degrees advance in term of fuel consumption. Your best efficiency in just about any situation is when your peak cylinder pressure is at 14 degrees ATDC. So running the minimum amount of fuel to keep the enigne turning at say 900RPM by using that timing is the way to go.

Y8s has a good point too. I wonder if a narrow band reading would be like .75V in this case.
Sparetire is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:40 PM
  #23  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

this eeeeprom of the stock 1.8L timing suggests it idles at 10*

Braineack is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:43 PM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
gospeed81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
Default

Wait...what is load in? Inches vacuum?
gospeed81 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:48 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
sn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lisle, IL
Posts: 297
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sparetire
AFAIK cars are basically designed to idle at around stoich or a tad leaner. Certanly wont hurt anything.

I always found that richening things up a bit made for a smooth idle, but other than maybe a slight change in perceived NVH, no reason to run it rich at idle. I cant beleive people are ideling at 13:1. Dont most OEMs try to run like 20+ degrees of timinmg at idle too? Its much more efficient to run at stoich with around 20 degrees advance in term of fuel consumption. Your best efficiency in just about any situation is when your peak cylinder pressure is at 14 degrees ATDC. So running the minimum amount of fuel to keep the enigne turning at say 900RPM by using that timing is the way to go.

Y8s has a good point too. I wonder if a narrow band reading would be like .75V in this case.
I've played around with my OBD-II scanner/live data tool on a few late model cars (Jeep GC, BMW) to look at "factory idle". Startup is open loop, then cars go to closed loop in under a minute. Ignition timing is "dithered" up & down (delta can be as high as 10 degrees at idle) to maintain target idle speed within about 25 RPM. If you can get a boosted Miata to idle smooth at stoich, there is no reason to go any richer. As Y8s notes, going leaner than stoich (some combinations will idle OK leaner than stoich) is problematic because it significantly raises emissions levels and will save very little fuel.

.
sn95 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:50 PM
  #26  
Elite Member
 
Sparetire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
Default

Huh. You learn something every day. Good to know that they start in open loop. Makes sense I guess since the sensor is not really ready to go untill it heats up. They must run those heater elements in order to get them to closed loop sooner for emmisions.

The map looks like Mt. Fuji. Except not really.

I think it would be baddass to design a setup such that the fuel or spark map looks like Elvis or something. But you would need some really good resolution in your mapping to do that.
Sparetire is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 06:18 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
spoolin2bars's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: south texas
Posts: 1,415
Total Cats: 10
Default

you guys are crazy idleing below 13:1. way too rich, besides washing the cylinder walls down with fuel, the unburned gas is contaminating you oil prematurely. smell you dipstick, does it smell like gas? not good. my car idles great between 15-16:1 afr. 14.7-15.2 is the norm for stock vehicles. (that's the range of the narrow band o2 sensor usually also)

best compromise at wot when i run trackdays is 11.7-11.8 afr. 11.5 and below is too rich, power loss and and low mpg are not necessary.
above 12.0 doesn't leave any safety cushion.
spoolin2bars is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 06:46 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
sn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lisle, IL
Posts: 297
Total Cats: 0
Default

Brain,

Is that 1.8 map from an OBD-I or OBD-II car??
sn95 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 08:16 PM
  #29  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
JayL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,881
Total Cats: 2
Default

After a fresh start this afternoon I made some progress. Found out that my IAC was sticking open and even though it allowed me to idle leaner than usual it created other issues. It now idles in the high 13s with no load and it rises to mid 14s when the fan kicks on. This is at just over 1000 rpm and is about the smoothest it has ever been with 16* of timing. I think I'll leave it like this for now.
JayL is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 10:00 PM
  #30  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Cspence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,065
Total Cats: 1
Default

On my old VE table and spark table my car used to surge a little at idle and run in the 13's and 10* spark 800ish rpm. Now after getting my maps straightened out it idles pretty darn smooth at 14.5-15 afr 19* spark and 1000rpm
Cspence is offline  
Old 04-29-2010, 05:06 PM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
CRAIGO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 272
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'd also like to know what the load axis relates too 0-15?

Brain?
CRAIGO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
01-08-2021 11:24 AM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
10-01-2015 09:30 AM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
09-30-2015 02:44 PM
itsMikey
MSPNP
3
09-28-2015 06:40 AM



Quick Reply: Lean idle question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.