Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Rod choice for high-rev NA6 ITB build

Old May 10, 2026 | 05:02 PM
  #1  
-rX.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 3
Total Cats: 0
Default Rod choice for high-rev NA6 ITB build

Hello guys

I have a question regarding rod selection for my current build.

I’m in the middle of a fairly serious engine project: a high-revving NA6CE 1.6 with ITBs.
The base engine is the stock 115 hp unit, and I’ve already gathered most of the internal components.

Current build overview:

  • Block / displacement
    • NA6CE 1.6
    • 81 mm overbore (approx. 1720 cc)
  • Bottom end
    • ACL Race bearings
    • Fluidampr crank damper
    • Boundary Stage 1 oil pump
    • 1.0 mm head gasket
    • Target compression: ~11.3–11.4:1
    • Toda 3.5 kg flywheel)
  • Head / valvetrain
    • Toda forged pistons 81mm
    • Toda 272° / 10.3 mm lift camshafts
    • Toda adjustable cam gears + timing belt
    • Supertech +1.0 mm intake & exhaust valves
    • Supertech valve guides
    • Supertech dual valve springs
    • Supertech valve stem seals
    • Shim-under-bucket conversion
    • Head skimmed 0.55 mm
  • Induction
    • Jenvey individual throttle bodies (ITBs)
  • RPM target
    • ~9000 rpm max

My question:

I’m currently deciding on connecting rods and wanted some input from people who have built similar high-rev NA BP engines.

I’ve been looking at:
  • Carrillo rods (~432 g) – very light, excellent reputation
  • Maruha rods (~460 g) – slightly heavier, also well-regarded
My main concern is:
  • Are Carrillo rods too light for a 9000 rpm NA build like this?
  • Or is that weight actually ideal given the goal of reducing reciprocating mass?
  • Would you personally go with something else entirely for this kind of setup?
I understand that lighter is generally better for high RPM response, but I also don’t want to sacrifice long-term reliability or introduce issues with harmonics / fatigue margin.

If anyone has experience with similar builds (especially high-rev NA 1.6–1.8 BP engines revving near 9k), I’d really appreciate your input.

Also, if you have any general comments about the build, feel free to let me know, this is my first big engine project and I’m trying to make sure I’m not missing anything obvious before I assemble it.
Important Note:The car will be used as a weekend car, mainly for spirited driving, with occasional track and drift days.

Because of that, I’m not building a pure race engine, but something fun and responsive that can still handle occasional abuse.
Old May 10, 2026 | 05:28 PM
  #2  
rascal's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 166
Total Cats: 41
From: SE Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by -rX.
but I also don’t want to sacrifice long-term reliability .
then ditch any ideas of running to 9000rpm. This is no Honda motor.
quickest way to wear out a motor, even if built with all the best bits is to rev it to the moon.
Old May 10, 2026 | 05:32 PM
  #3  
-rX.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 3
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rascal
then ditch any ideas of running to 9000rpm. This is no Honda motor.
quickest way to wear out a motor, even if built with all the best bits is to rev it to the moon.
Yes, that is clear to me that it is not a Honda engine 😄

And yes, I know it’s not ideal to use “high-rev” and “reliable” in the same sentence, but I want to make the best of it.

I’m fully aware it won’t last another 200,000 km, so don’t worry 🙂
Old May 10, 2026 | 05:54 PM
  #4  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,629
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Stock ports and valve dimensions with those cams, the B6 won't flow nearly enough to get to 9k and make any power. I'd expect more like peak power at 7700 and running out of breath by about 8000, assuming you get the runner lengths correct (math). In any case, light rods are a good idea for a build like that. Good luck with it. Post dyno plot.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old May 10, 2026 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
-rX.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: May 2026
Posts: 3
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Stock ports and valve dimensions with those cams, the B6 won't flow nearly enough to get to 9k and make any power. I'd expect more like peak power at 7700 and running out of breath by about 8000, assuming you get the runner lengths correct (math). In any case, light rods are a good idea for a build like that. Good luck with it. Post dyno plot.
There will be complete head and block work done, including ports for the oversized valves 🙂Okay, I understand. I hope I will still get some good power nevertheless.

Would you pick Carrillo or Maruha rods?
Old May 10, 2026 | 06:25 PM
  #6  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,629
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Originally Posted by -rX.
There will be complete head and block work done, including ports for the oversized valves 🙂Okay, I understand. I hope I will still get some good power nevertheless.

Would you pick Carrillo or Maruha rods?
Whichever is lightest. It won't rev high or make too much power so you don't need monster rods.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old May 10, 2026 | 07:11 PM
  #7  
LeoNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 107
From: Commiefornia
Default

I agree with Emilio. Not enough cylinder head. I wouldn’t expect more than 150hp NA on gas. A turbo build would be less expensive and make twice the HP.

The CP ProA rod at 416gr would be the best option with a lightened piston and a taper wall pin. The ProSA rod is 431gr which is basically the same rod with a thicker center web. I’m running a set in a turbo build that runs to 7500rpm with no issues after 5kmi.









.

Last edited by LeoNA; May 10, 2026 at 07:25 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmk0401
Engine Performance
16
Mar 31, 2026 12:57 AM
spencer.n_
Engine Performance
5
Mar 1, 2024 09:26 PM
Leafy
Engine Performance
19
Mar 19, 2015 05:50 PM
6strngs
Engine Performance
22
Nov 25, 2013 09:55 PM
zoomzoom
Engine Performance
23
Jul 20, 2011 06:57 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 PM.