Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Turbo exhaust theory discussion

Old Jan 27, 2016 | 05:58 AM
  #21  
nitrodann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

I asked him if he was running a HUGE a/r and low low boost.

Would it even be theoretically possible this way?
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 09:22 AM
  #22  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

nope
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 09:26 AM
  #23  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

What is the power ouput that he's claiming with this magical setup?
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 03:07 PM
  #24  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by stefanst
You stopped too late. First stop should have been conservation of mass. He's probably referring to Bernoulli and that's conservation of energy.
Maybe some of that mass turns into energy!
E=mc^2 you know!!
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 03:20 PM
  #25  
stefanst's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,215
Total Cats: 74
From: Lambertville, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Maybe some of that mass turns into energy!
E=mc^2 you know!!
Which is, of course, how the law of conservation of mass was ultimately proven to be wrong. So either way he was wrong starting with word #3
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 03:22 PM
  #26  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

The turbo kit is called "Alfabert Omegastein II" with optional doodoo box and every part comes in a separate box over a period of 3 years.
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 03:25 PM
  #27  
stefanst's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,215
Total Cats: 74
From: Lambertville, NJ
Default

Upgrade to "Supernova" for the low-low price of a few trillion tons of hydrogen.
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 02:00 AM
  #28  
Alumilo's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 15
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Stopped reading right there. The whole point of the larger exhaust is to increase flow rate.
I guess I was up too late. Anyway I'm just trying to break down the concept to see where the 2.5" would be advantageous. By what means does the larger pipe allow increased flow rates? The damn title of this thread has theory in it after all...

EDIT: WHO TOOK MY CAT AWAY!?
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 03:04 AM
  #29  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Alumilo
...By what means does the larger pipe allow increased flow rates? ...
The turbine on the turbo is extracting energy from the exhaust to drive the compressor. The total amount of thermal energy in the exhaust is called enthalpy. The amount of energy at any given point is the mass flow times the enthalpy. Energy = mass flow x Enthalpy

The change in enthalpy across the turbine is how much energy the turbine extracted from the exhaust. You want to maximize this to make it spool faster. It takes a certain mass flow to spool the turbo, the quicker you get that mass flow, the sooner you get boost.

A larger exhaust pipe after the turbine lowers the pressure on that side of the turbine. The bigger the pipe, the lower the pressure will be. This improves the flow in the system, so mass flow goes up at any given boost pressure. So more mass flow everywhere from spooling to redline.

This has two big benefits. Time to boost is shorter, and power at a given boost level will be higher. Smaller benefit would be reduced turbine inlet pressure, which will make the motor slightly more knock resistant too due to less internal EGR.
Old Jan 29, 2016 | 09:43 PM
  #30  
HexRX's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 0
From: Southern California
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
The turbine on the turbo is extracting energy from the exhaust to drive the compressor. The total amount of thermal energy in the exhaust is called enthalpy. The amount of energy at any given point is the mass flow times the enthalpy. Energy = mass flow x Enthalpy

The change in enthalpy across the turbine is how much energy the turbine extracted from the exhaust. You want to maximize this to make it spool faster. It takes a certain mass flow to spool the turbo, the quicker you get that mass flow, the sooner you get boost.
.
Work through the system would be = Mass flow x Enthalpy through the turbine - the abs value of the Mass flow x Enthalpy through the compressor;

You also want to minimize the work that the compressor has to do, it is a small amount but if you can optimize this there are gainz to be had. Also the pressure ratio of the turbine is directly related to the temperature, if you can increase the temp prior to the turbine you can increase the delta of the enthalpy which will give you more power. Yet we are a bit limited on a metallurgical level here as melting pistons and such is no fun.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 03:56 PM
  #31  
gtiracer06's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14
Total Cats: -2
Default

from what i always understand. bigger will give you more top end, and better peak hp....smaller, but not too small will give you better low end
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 03:57 PM
  #32  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by gtiracer06
from what i always understand. bigger will give you more top end, and better peak hp....smaller, but not too small will give you better low end
That's wrong.
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 04:59 PM
  #33  
fivehundredton's Avatar
Bannisheded
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 165
Total Cats: -1
From: Senatobia, MS
Default

Originally Posted by gtiracer06
from what i always understand. bigger will give you more top end, and better peak hp....smaller, but not too small will give you better low end
Pat just explained it
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 05:08 PM
  #34  
albumleaf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,151
Total Cats: 92
Default

Originally Posted by gtiracer06
from what i always understand. bigger will give you more top end, and better peak hp....smaller, but not too small will give you better low end
No. Please stop regurgitating this garbage.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
borka
DIY Turbo Discussion
150
Aug 9, 2016 10:24 AM
Fast Freddy
WTB
5
Mar 9, 2016 12:01 PM
Kimmerlykg
Meet and Greet
16
Jan 23, 2016 01:53 AM
gumball89
DIY Turbo Discussion
12
Jan 22, 2016 06:48 PM
William1997
ECUs and Tuning
11
Jan 18, 2016 06:56 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM.