GT3071R or GT3076R? - Page 2 - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to Miataturbo.net   Members
 


General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2010, 10:07 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 224
Total Cats: -1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savington View Post


Forgive me if I'm not impressed, especially for a street car.
do you have one with the 2876r .86 by any chance?
94blackmx5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:22 PM   #22
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,923
Total Cats: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pschmidt View Post
....Turbo will be V-banded with the Tial .64 housing.
Good choice going with the .64 housing.
JayL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:24 PM   #23
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 14,362
Total Cats: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctdrftna View Post
i 2nd this, everything works together, hence why im making 418whp on 18psi, thats with a 3071 .64.
Post cam specs immediately, please.
Savington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:41 PM   #24
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,282
Total Cats: 0
Default

Good thread as I'm unsure as to what turbo I want to run the 99.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 10:47 PM   #25
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,782
Total Cats: 119
Default

Wirelessly posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savington
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctdrftna View Post
i 2nd this, everything works together, hence why im making 418whp on 18psi, thats with a 3071 .64.
Post cam specs immediately, please.
Post bullshit dyno plot and magical cam specs plez.
Faeflora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 11:04 PM   #26
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,362
Total Cats: 3
Default

There is better options out there then the GT30R, HTA's an PTE Billets are better technology produce more power, and spool faster.
jtothawhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2010, 12:17 AM   #27
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cromwell CT
Posts: 1,106
Total Cats: 48
Default

im tired, and not gonna post the same **** thats in my build thread "tube front drifter"

integral r3 intake 295 duration @ .490 lift
r1 exhaust 282 duration @ .455 lift (i think)

this was on a 13.5psi spring with no boost control, so im creeping to 18 max
tial mvs 38mm.

go look at the last few pages of my build i have dyno vids,charts and you can find all the motor info you want there.

im running the motor to 8000rpm as well. it was way more in, i can easily push this setup to 25psi. just need a bigger gate and a boost controller, and the power would hit way harder. my powerband is super linear because of no ebc and creep. i dont get that power surge like more big power setups. but it still rips face at 5000+

i recomend a 3071 to anyone. just have the needed mods to make it work as a package
ctdrftna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2010, 03:52 AM   #28
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 14,362
Total Cats: 1,323
Default

Name:  JOSHLAROSE.jpg
Views: 75
Size:  64.6 KB

Please fix your shitty boost control issues, or at least post a boost curve. This may or may not prove my theory that cams are the next high-RPM chokehold (after intake manifolds).

Really, just fix the boost control issue. You are WAY down on torque compared to my setup on the low end, but I don't know if that's cams or shitty boost control or what.

Name:  2871vs3071cams.jpg
Views: 74
Size:  24.0 KB
Savington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2010, 05:54 AM   #29
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cromwell CT
Posts: 1,106
Total Cats: 48
Default

well cams are alot of it, i didnt play with my cam gears on the dyno. i degreed in a few more degrees of overlap then what was called for. the car wont idle below 1700. im sure i can advance the exhaust cam a little and help it build a little more cyl pressure and that will help alot. im getting low compression test numbers, like 125psi due to it bleeding compression in overlap. then there is my intake mani wich i designed for top end power. but no doubt a bigger gate and boost controler will get my boost hitting alot sooner. however im content right now. i have bigger fish to fry,like finishing the car.

sorry for the threadjack
ctdrftna is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbo center housing leaking coolent? bbundy DIY Turbo Discussion 23 07-13-2015 02:54 PM
Garrett GT3076R with FM2 Cast Manifold? GrahamC DIY Turbo Discussion 9 05-12-2012 04:54 PM
Fun Pics. GT3071R .63A/R vs GT2860RS .64A/R & misc TurboTim Media 38 04-21-2010 07:03 PM
turbo needed 1990miata1.6 WTB 6 04-08-2009 06:00 PM
My plan - am I about to do something dumb? MazDilla DIY Turbo Discussion 3 03-29-2008 02:14 AM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.