Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

PPF delete - Relocating ground

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 09:46 AM
  #1  
MuchoBoosto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 44
Total Cats: 11
Default PPF delete - Relocating ground

Finally completed my PPF delete w/ the KMiata rear diff brace and a V8R trans support. Yay. Now that the PPF is gone i've gotta figure out where to run this ground that used to connect to the PPF. Since i'm an electrical dunce I need some ideas where to run this ground to since the Miata already seems to have a so-so reputation for bad grounds.
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 10:52 AM
  #2  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

You might consider grounding it at the trans somehow. This ground goes from the battery, bolts to the chassis right behind it, then goes down through a grommet where it’s grounded at the ppf. So going to the body or subframe is already taken care of in the trunk. The one on the ppf helps ground the engine along with the strap behind the header
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 12:01 PM
  #3  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

I am not an EE, but I drilled my PPF delete for a rivnut and stuck the ground there. The car did not seem to mind that.
Old Feb 3, 2019 | 12:11 PM
  #4  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
I am not an EE
I am.

The PPF served an interesting function in this regard. It electrically tied the front and rear of the drivetrain together. The ground strap which originally went to it actually is not 100% necessary, as the battery is locally tied to the body in the rear, and the engine (including the alternator) is tied to the body at the front, on the exhaust side.

That being said, redundancy is good. If you want to duplicate this redundancy, do what curly suggests and run a new ground wire from battery (-) up to some point on the transmission.
Old Feb 4, 2019 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
MuchoBoosto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 44
Total Cats: 11
Default

Thank you.

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I am.

The PPF served an interesting function in this regard. It electrically tied the front and rear of the drivetrain together. The ground strap which originally went to it actually is not 100% necessary, as the battery is locally tied to the body in the rear, and the engine (including the alternator) is tied to the body at the front, on the exhaust side.

That being said, redundancy is good. If you want to duplicate this redundancy, do what curly suggests and run a new ground wire from battery (-) up to some point on the transmission.
Old Feb 6, 2019 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,157
Total Cats: 3,537
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

When I did my ppf delete for the BMW transmission I neglected to run the additional ground from the ppf to the transmission and suffered a melted wiring harness on both cooling fan circuits and a few other interesting places. I would highly recommend doing as Joe suggested and running a large gauge ground to the transmission or engine block.
Old Feb 6, 2019 | 11:47 AM
  #7  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Yeah do what Joe said which was listen to curly which was ground to the trans!
Old Feb 6, 2019 | 05:47 PM
  #8  
brainzata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 542
Total Cats: 17
From: Bay Area CA
Default

If you are going to run cable, which you should. Terminate it at the engine for a better result than to the trans, not much extra cable to do that. The miata rear chassis ground is depending on welded old sheet metal at the rear of the car and that's why mazda had the ground cable terminate in two points.
Old Feb 6, 2019 | 06:12 PM
  #9  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by brainzata
Terminate it at the engine for a better result than to the trans,
Why? The electrical resistance of the transmission case, and at the union between the transmission and the engine block, has gotta be so low as to be immeasurable with conventional instruments.

The additional length of wire to reach the engine would add far more resistance to the path than the transmission case.
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 05:04 PM
  #10  
brainzata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 542
Total Cats: 17
From: Bay Area CA
Default

The transmission case is saturated with oils, bolted together with sealers, is not copper, has many seams that oils can find their way into. I'd highly doubt the resistance would be less. But to each their own. I would opt for a direct path with an important main ground. Also bolting to the transmission case where? One would have to drill and tap the case on the webbing or use the large 12/14mm ppf mounting holes and that would mean the cable is going to be suspended in the air from trans tunnel to trans.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 21, 2019 | 11:54 AM
  #11  
TheScaryOne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 592
Total Cats: 47
From: Tucson, Az
Default

Does V8R have a listing on their website for just the bolt-in transmission mount? I see it's part of their driveline swap kit, but can't find just the mount.
Old Feb 21, 2019 | 12:06 PM
  #12  
tomrev's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 387
Total Cats: 41
From: N. Mi.
Default

I like to use one of the starter mount bolts as my ground point. This is pretty much what everyone is saying with the engine, or trans as ground. My reason is the biggest draw seen is probably the starter cranking, so having a nice, fat ground cable bolted to it makes for happy cranking. Then everything trying to ground thru the engine is also happy.
Old Jan 3, 2021 | 08:07 AM
  #13  
Flerbizky's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 4
From: Ribe, Denmark / aka. The Sticks
Default

Originally Posted by tomrev
I like to use one of the starter mount bolts as my ground point. This is pretty much what everyone is saying with the engine, or trans as ground. My reason is the biggest draw seen is probably the starter cranking, so having a nice, fat ground cable bolted to it makes for happy cranking. Then everything trying to ground thru the engine is also happy.
This makes a lot of sense. Thank you!
Old Jan 13, 2021 | 05:17 AM
  #14  
Eunos91's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 362
Total Cats: 94
From: Munich
Default

Would someone in the know please proof-read my plan? I want to replace my starter battery with a 7.5 Ah LiFePo4 battery for large 2-cyl. motorcycles and relocate it to behind the tombstone. Car is a track toy without radio etc., so there is sufficient space, and when the car is parked connection is interrupted by means of a killswitch. As for negative grounds I'd:
- run a cable from the battery to a ground bolt in the passenger footwell (remove paint first, of course) --> battery grounded to chassis in front
- run a cable from that bolt through the firewall to a starter bolt --> grounds engine & transmission to chassis (in addition to the OEM engine ground on the driver's side)
- run a cable from the rear of the PPF to the chassis ground near the stock battery location --> closes ground loop (battery - footwell chassis ground - engine ground - rear chassis ground) for optimum grounding.

any objections? This would allow me to save some 10 kg from the battery and 2 kg from the long-*** OEM battery cable (weighs 2.5 kg in stock form)
Old Jan 13, 2021 | 02:12 PM
  #15  
technicalninja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 675
Total Cats: 192
From: Granbury Texas
Default

The physics are fine. It will work great!

My ONLY objection is having a lithium battery that close to your body.
My son was a track marshal/fire suppression guy out at MSR and he says...
"Very hard to put out a Li battery fire, you just have to let it burn out..."
Old Jan 13, 2021 | 04:43 PM
  #16  
Eunos91's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 362
Total Cats: 94
From: Munich
Default

THX!

We install them on thousands of our bikes. People spend their whole life with their ***** literally 5 cm away from the battery. I'll cope. If anything, I got to spend years in a 30 year old **** box filled with 45L of a highly inflammable liquid right behind my back LOL
Old Jan 14, 2021 | 03:08 AM
  #17  
HarryB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,081
Total Cats: 154
Default

Just put some sort of firewall/box around it, so it buys you some time if need be. In that regard, LiFePo is by far the safest Li-based battery chemistry.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fireindc
General Miata Chat
7
Jul 14, 2019 10:28 PM
Smartdummy
ECUs and Tuning
5
Jun 23, 2016 05:26 PM
btabor
ECUs and Tuning
10
Sep 28, 2015 05:33 PM
Vashthestampede
General Miata Chat
4
Aug 10, 2008 01:16 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM.