Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Radiator flow restrictor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #41  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Stock is 190.4. The "hot" aftermarket one I found is 192°

Typically AM does not have the sub thermo and warm the car up slower, even if they will maintain a higher temp. Which is OK for the application I suppose.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #42  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Heat capacity is largely a function of temperature, not pressure. So changes in pressure will have very negligible effects.

Running more anitfreeze and less water will reduce the heat capacity of the coolant.


EDIT: From thermo 1 book, enthalpy for water

at 100*C @ 10kPa = 2687.46 kJ/kg

at 100*C @ 50kPa = 2682.52 kJ/kg

For a loss, of 0.0018%. Tiny, and pressure hurts heat capacity, not helps it.

Last edited by patsmx5; Oct 31, 2008 at 12:54 PM.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #43  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Stock is 190.4. The "hot" aftermarket one I found is 192°

Typically AM does not have the sub thermo and warm the car up slower, even if they will maintain a higher temp. Which is OK for the application I suppose.
I use the Stant regular model and have good results. the superstant sucks.

see joe perez' video.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #44  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Brainsboy
not a good idea to block water flow from the lower radiator hose. There is a reason upper radiator hoses are smaller than the bottom hoses. By placing a plate in the lower radiator hose the pump builds pressure all the way up through the radiator which causes you to dump water out the radiator cap during high rpm. Upper hoses are smaller so the pressure is in the motor and the pump sucks from the radiator avoiding the above mentioned problem. The pressure were talking about here is not pressure from heat, its the current pressure from the pump.

Yeah uh... about that. I don't know what car you are talking about but the inlet and outlet of my radiators are both 1.25".
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #45  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by paul
Yeah uh... about that. I don't know what car you are talking about but the inlet and outlet of my radiators are both 1.25".
actually, the water neck from the rad to the pump is the bottleneck of the system in our cars. However, I also discovered that this lower pipe follows the required shape for a coolant reroute, so I'm using it for a hard-pipe instead of the rubber ****.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #46  
KPLAFIN's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
From: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
but I wouldn't mind making it warm up a tad bit quicker.
Originally Posted by y8s
I was going by his first post. Must've overlooked the other one somehow. My bad.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
Oct 23, 2016 07:58 AM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
Oct 19, 2015 03:23 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Goldwar
DIY Turbo Discussion
2
Sep 29, 2015 09:20 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.