Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Is upgrading my FMIC a good idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:24 PM
  #1  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default Is upgrading my FMIC a good idea?

I have the old FM intercooler and my IATs get up to 130-140 degrees on an 75 degree day during a quick 25psi pull.

Even cruising around town my IAT will be 96-105 on a 75 to 80 degree day. I haven't relocated the IAT sensor to the IC exit, but it's not right up in front of the TB either. Does it look like an IC is in order, or do you think the IAT sensor location is the main issue? $100 bucks for a new intercooler seems pretty reasonable if it will keep the temps down so that I don't have to rely on large MAT corrections.



This is the IC I am looking at.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Unive...Q5fAccessories
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
aaronc7's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,116
Total Cats: 43
From: Florida
Default

i say get some alcohol/water injection!
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:44 PM
  #3  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Where is your IC located? It might be worth while moving it to a new spot. But at the same time, a new intercooler wouldn't hurt.
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #4  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

I was using the old FM intercooler too, and just recently installed the new style one with side tanks, not top and bottom. I'm still waiting on some eBay couplings to show up, but I ordered the **** almost 2 weeks ago. How long does it take to ship some silicone couplings?
I too am curious to see where my IAT's will be.
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #5  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Give us some pics of your IC and it's location please. Along with AIT location.
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 11:38 PM
  #6  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

I was using the old FM intercooler too, and just recently installed the new style one with side tanks, not top and bottom. I'm still waiting on some eBay couplings to show up, but I ordered the **** almost 2 weeks ago. How long does it take to ship some silicone couplings?
I too am curious to see where my IAT's will be.
Please post soem before and after IAT numbers.

Give us some pics of your IC and it's location please. Along with AIT location.
IC is mounted front and center. I came across this thread. https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/ebay-intercooler-would-you-buy-31074/ My IAT sensor is located about 2/3 of the way down the straight length of pipe that conects the elbow to the TB and the pipe that curves around to the IC. The bung is welded to the back side if the pipe. Overall distance I would say it is half way between the IC and TB. almost level with bottom of radiator. Levnubin said he was getting better IATs with the busted *** looking FM one like I currently have. MAybe it's not worth it, IDK.

Name:  IMG_7299.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  87.0 KB
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 12:08 AM
  #7  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

I have a relatively small begi "#3" intercooler. It's worked fine for me up to 400hp with no rises in AITs on 21psi pulls.

My AIT sensor does indeed heatsoak though- located about 10 inches from TB inlet.

Huge intercoolers aren't neccesary. I say move your sensor first and then log. It's easier.

BTW how much power are you putting down @ 25psi with that china 2870? 3...40?
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
I have a relatively small begi "#3" intercooler. It's worked fine for me up to 400hp with no rises in AITs on 21psi pulls.

My AIT sensor does indeed heatsoak though- located about 10 inches from TB inlet.

Huge intercoolers aren't neccesary. I say move your sensor first and then log. It's easier.

BTW how much power are you putting down @ 25psi with that china 2870? 3...40?
I guess moving the sensor is the cheapest step to take. I'm not sure what I'm putting down. There really isn't a good way to estimate with the china stuff. I'm trying to get a few small things sorted so I can go put it on the dyno.
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 08:26 AM
  #9  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

It appears you're only making a delta of 35°F at 25psi.

Assuming the turbo dumps out 10* per psi (i think it's closer to 15-20), that means it's 86% efficient.

granted you didn't hit redline... the lowest you logged was 98*F, I assume your sensor heatsoaks if you were saying it was a 75*F day out?


You want an IC with at least 18" runners...your current has what 7-9'?
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 08:42 AM
  #10  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

begi #3 intercooler, high to mid 60's, on a racetrack, 3rd gear.

This is before I worked on the ducting.

I think that no matter what turbo car I own, it will always have a BEGi intercooler. I like it because the tubes and and fins are thicker than most. Some of my past intercoolers have probably lost efficiency due to bugs and rocks, this one looks relatively unaffected by them.
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 09:36 AM
  #11  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Brain: It sounds like you suggest that the IC is fine, but then say it's length is inadequate. Are you suggesting an upgrade or not? It sounds to me like you think the efficiency is higher than 86% if you feel that 10* per psi is conservative. If it can maintain 135-140* to redline do you suggest keep it or upgrade?

Hustler: What was ambient temp that day?

Just out of curiosity, if your using the diy GM IAT sensor, what are your resistor values?
I can't remember if I'm using the suggested values for IAT and slightly modified values for CLT.

I don't want to waste time moving the IAT sensor if the IC is inadequate form the beginning. If everyone thinks there will be a marginal gain from a new IC, then I'll just move the sensor and be happy. I'll probably move the sensor anyway. I bet it will only take an hour to drill and tap the IC. Anyone happen to know the thread type for IAT? I have some NPT taps.
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #12  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623
Brain: It sounds like you suggest that the IC is fine, but then say it's length is inadequate. Are you suggesting an upgrade or not? It sounds to me like you think the efficiency is higher than 86% if you feel that 10* per psi is conservative. If it can maintain 135-140* to redline do you suggest keep it or upgrade?
Yeah but your log also shows a min of 98* and it was probably sitting closer to 110*F before you went WOT. On a 75° day, my AIT sensor shows 76-77°F. That makes me think the sensor was not reporting the correct temps prior to the pull, and the delta was more like 55°.

Regardless, those temps are getting into the range of wanting something longer. Do a pull from 2-3-4-5 all to redline and see what the temps get to.

FYI. The longer the runner the better, obviously. 18-21" long tube reaches the point of diminishing returns. Those short runner IC simply don't cool the charge by the time the air reaches the endtank...not long enough.


Just out of curiosity, if your using the diy GM IAT sensor, what are your resistor values?
the "GM" selection under thermistor calibration.

I don't want to waste time moving the IAT sensor if the IC is inadequate form the beginning. If everyone thinks there will be a marginal gain from a new IC, then I'll just move the sensor and be happy. I'll probably move the sensor anyway. I bet it will only take an hour to drill and tap the IC. Anyone happen to know the thread type for IAT? I have some NPT taps.
The benefit of moving the sensor is getting more accurate temps reported. Before I moved mine I used to see my AITs drop in boost because all the extra airflow would actually cool off the sensor. I typically see 5*F above ambient when I'm cruising around.
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 09:56 AM
  #13  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Any new data on the bar and plate vs the tube and fin? The one I'm looking at (link in first post) is a tube and fin design.
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 09:59 AM
  #14  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

tube and fin is lighter and more efficient, however they dont flow as well.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.