Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

FR-S has roll oversteer built in?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 04:47 PM
  #1  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default FR-S has roll oversteer built in?

Willall Racing - WR310 WRX STi

The Toyota version of the 86/BRZ features a strong tendency to roll oversteer at high speed which was one of the first parts of the handling character that was to be dialed out.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 05:11 PM
  #2  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

I've read that the FR-S tends to be a little more edgy on the handing and tends to oversteer when pushed. Where the BRZ is a little more "refined" and doesn't tend to twitch on corner exit. I believe they use a slightly different spring rate in the rear is really the only difference.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 11:18 PM
  #3  
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,182
Total Cats: 18
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

The scion is for ricers, so they make it a driftoto machine.

Subaru is for understeer loving lesbians, so they make it plow.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 01:30 AM
  #4  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

yeah except its exactly the opposite: the brz is the one that has the stiffer rears
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 08:17 AM
  #5  
2ndGearRubber's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,182
Total Cats: 18
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
yeah except its exactly the opposite: the brz is the one that has the stiffer rears
That doesn't match up with anything I've heard from the automotive press. IIRC, it's mainly damping curves that make the FRS more twitchy.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 10:11 AM
  #6  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Car and Driver
At the limit, you’ll find the key difference between the Subaru and the Scion. Go screaming into a turn or hop on the gas too early exiting one, and the Subaru simply understeers—perhaps for the benefit of drivers familiar with the brand’s all-wheel-drive products. The Scion uses softer springs and stiffer shocks, and it has a sensitivity to driver inputs that makes it feel alive. Too much or too little throttle upsets the Scion’s balance, sending the car into an easily controlled drift. Its behavior reminds us of the dearly departed first-generation Honda S2000. It’s not impossible to get the Subaru to oversteer—deliberately timed and moderated inputs will coax the tail out—it’s just not going to catch you by surprise. In either car, though, the transition from cornering to drifting is gradual, and the low curb weight—about 2800 pounds—helps make it easy to rein in a slide before you tailwhip your neighbor’s mailbox.
The above goes along with most every review I've read.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 02:19 PM
  #7  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

"Roll oversteer" is different than static balance from springs/sways. Transient behavior from the shock tuning is different still.

Roll oversteer is a geometry thing. From the original link:

Without changing spring rates, but by changing rear suspension geometry and a carefully applied program of anti-roll bar development and bushing alterations the stability and handling of the 86 have been transformed. All of this has been achieved without changing the playful nature of the 86 in general driving conditions. High speed handling is now up there with the very best sports coupes around, and this is reflected in the lap times and general performance that WR86 delivers.
I wonder if there really is roll oversteer geometry in the car.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 02:32 PM
  #8  
damir130's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 6
Default

It might also be a case of trying to justify a 2500$ price tag for a swaybar + bushing package.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 04:38 PM
  #9  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Originally Posted by damir130
It might also be a case of trying to justify a 2500$ price tag for a swaybar + bushing package.
This. Nossa senhora those prices are absolutely OUTRAGEOUS.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 05:59 PM
  #10  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

WTF I didn't actually read the link until you said that. $4k for exhaust and a tune too? Is that normal for newer cars or is this just first-to-market price gouging? I mean 4k for ~40ft-lbs and 50hp?
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 06:38 PM
  #11  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
WTF I didn't actually read the link until you said that. $4k for exhaust and a tune too? Is that normal for newer cars or is this just first-to-market price gouging? I mean 4k for ~40ft-lbs and 50hp?
.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #12  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

The GT-86 is something like a $60k car in OZ.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 06:42 PM
  #13  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Sorry, this is my first foray into modding cars. Everything for the Miata is so cheap that I am almost always surprised at how much parts for other cars (besides hondas) cost.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 09:31 PM
  #14  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
WTF I didn't actually read the link until you said that. $4k for exhaust and a tune too? Is that normal for newer cars or is this just first-to-market price gouging? I mean 4k for ~40ft-lbs and 50hp?
Maybe 4k for a header, mid pipe, cat back, intake, and tune.
Old Apr 12, 2013 | 09:32 PM
  #15  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
The above goes along with most every review I've read.
I stand corrected.
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 12:58 AM
  #16  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Midtenn
Maybe 4k for a header, mid pipe, cat back, intake, and tune.
So let's break this down. Intake should be $400max , assuming it replaces virtually all intake tubing and includes proper heat shielding/box with high quality materials.

Cat-back: another $400 or so, on the expensiveside still. Up to $800 total.

MMid pipe: maybe $$300? $1100 total...

Header: if its a grand, which is very spend for a header, that brings the total to $2100. So... with overpriced standard parts, that's $1900 for a tune and installation.

That's what I like to call ballzing ridiculous.
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 09:05 AM
  #17  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

I love how some automotive journalists are gigantic pussies and afraid of the S2K.

Jkav and Dave Coleman are notable exceptions to this generalization.
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 09:10 AM
  #18  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
So... with overpriced standard parts, that's $1900 for a tune and installation.

That's what I like to call ballzing ridiculous.
Does this stuff need to be CARB approved? I can see how that could raise the price considerably.
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 09:13 AM
  #19  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
So let's break this down. Intake should be $400max , assuming it replaces virtually all intake tubing and includes proper heat shielding/box with high quality materials.

Cat-back: another $400 or so, on the expensiveside still. Up to $800 total.

MMid pipe: maybe $$300? $1100 total...

Header: if its a grand, which is very spend for a header, that brings the total to $2100. So... with overpriced standard parts, that's $1900 for a tune and installation.

That's what I like to call ballzing ridiculous.
It does say the exhaust components are titanium which ups the price substantially. I do like the BBK for $4,250 though...
Old Apr 13, 2013 | 09:15 AM
  #20  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 2ndGearRubber
That doesn't match up with anything I've heard from the automotive press. IIRC, it's mainly damping curves that make the FRS more twitchy.
sounds like they added more rear bump travel and increased the front sway bar or subtracted the rear.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 AM.