Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

i finally put the miata on the track!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #61  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

The votes are in:
Non-OEM turbo under race conditions: welding or die!
Originally Posted by E-mail reply from the guy from the pictures below

Hi,
yes it was the only thing that lasted under race conditions...
all the types of fasteners I tried eventually failed..


Old May 26, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #62  
hustler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default




Old May 26, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #63  
hustler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Congrats to hustler for getting it on track.

Stein- I think there's an immense difference between beating a turbo car to death on the street vs. beating the same car on the track. The track is just 10x more grueling.

fwiw - Here's a solution from Percy - the Split Lock header hardware
unfortunately there is no way I will get even a cut-down allen wrench in my turbine housing to tighten it down, and no box-wrench will work either. I'm going to try stage 8, brb.
Old May 26, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #64  
tyson87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,020
Total Cats: 1
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

eureka!
great scott! ive got it.

i remember seeing this along time ago, wouldnt this work!!!


Old May 26, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #65  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

That'll keep the plate tight onto the manifold, but a weld will do the same thing, and the nuts will still back off those bolts.
Old May 26, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #66  
tyson87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,020
Total Cats: 1
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by curly
That'll keep the plate tight onto the manifold, but a weld will do the same thing, and the nuts will still back off those bolts.
i think the issue we are trying to fix is the studs. not the nuts

oh and i dont think welding it is a good idea, seems like a jimmy-rig.
what if ur turbo fails? what if u want to upgrade? u need to replace everything.
Old May 26, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #67  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by tyson87
i think the issue we are trying to fix is the studs. not the nuts

oh and i dont think welding it is a good idea, seems like a jimmy-rig.
what if ur turbo fails? what if u want to upgrade? u need to replace everything.
Or you just grind the welds down, replace, re-weld.
Old May 26, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #68  
hustler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

What about running bolts, drilling a hole through the manifold to pin it in place?
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #69  
tyson87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,020
Total Cats: 1
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
What about running bolts, drilling a hole through the manifold to pin it in place?
that or weld the studs in the manifold.
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #70  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
What about running bolts, drilling a hole through the manifold to pin it in place?
Not an option for cast log style BEGI or FM mfs. Plus bolts/nuts tend to loosen more than stud/nuts. There is a reason they use studs.
Studs also provide more accurate and consistent torque loading. Here's why. When you use bolts to secure the head, the fastener is actually being "twisted" while its being torqued tot he proper reading. Accordingly, the bolt is reacting to two different forces simultaneously. A stud should be installed in a relaxed mode - never crank it in tightly using a jammed nut. if everything is right, the stud should be installed finger tight. Then, when applying torque to the nut, the stud will stretch only in the vertical axis. Remember, an undercut shorter stud will have a rate similar to a longer, standard shank stud. This provides a more even clamping force on the head. Because the head gasket will compress upon initial torquing, make sure studs and bolts are re-torqud after the engine has been run.
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #71  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
What about running bolts, drilling a hole through the manifold to pin it in place?
I would use safety wire on bolts before I did that. With safety wire, the bolt can be re-torqued if need be. Also much easier to remove the turbo.
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #72  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
Not an option for cast log style BEGI or FM mfs. Plus bolts/nuts tend to loosen more than stud/nuts. There is a reason they use studs.
Not really. Making it so that the nuts don't come off isn't so hard. The hard part is making sure the studs don't come out of the manifold. It's also easy to make the studs not twist out, but once some of you actually drive hard, you will find that the studs just come straight out of the manifold, no twisting or anything. Simply shearing the threads off of the stud.
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #73  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
Or you just grind the welds down, replace, re-weld.
/thread
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #74  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
Not really. Making it so that the nuts don't come off isn't so hard. The hard part is making sure the studs don't come out of the manifold. It's also easy to make the studs not twist out, but once some of you actually drive hard, you will find that the studs just come straight out of the manifold, no twisting or anything. Simply shearing the threads off of the stud.
Studs shear, you retighten, they shear more and finally break loose. Yes, exactly that will happen with bolts that go through too. Doesn't matter that we can fix the nut or the stud. We need to fix both at the same time. Thus tack weld nut to stud and nut to turbo and turbo to mani. I am going to have this done soon.
Old May 26, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #75  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

I did not have problems with self-clinching nuts coming loose from the studs. So I would think that tack-welding the studs in place would be enough. Bend-tab nut plates and safety wire could be used on the nuts for extra insurance. That way it can still be disassembled without grinding.
Old May 26, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #76  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
Audi uses 8mm and they just stay on. They engineered the entire engine, turbo, exhaust in terms of load, vibration, movement, etc. We're just sucker slapping a turbo to a NA car, much like the Honda guys...


That's what I'm saying. Because we are asking our flange studs/bolts to do more than just clamp the turbo down. Our problems come from a variety of side loads, vibrations, heat, improper sized holes, wrong material, improper torquing, poorly supported exhaust system, excessive motor twist, ect. I think 8 and even 10mm are just too small for what we are asking them to do.

If you are having issues with the threads shearing off the stud you likely need more thread area. Increasing the diameter, pitch, alloy and length may resolve your issue.

Of course there is the possibility that there is just too much going on and welding the turbo to the manifold is the final solution, but I think most of us would like to avoid that.
Old May 26, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #77  
j_man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Someone has to start calling FM, Begi and M-Tuned every day about switching their stuff to V-bands




Old May 26, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #78  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by j_man
Someone has to start calling FM, Begi and M-Tuned every day about switching their stuff to V-bands
Problem with that is then you can no longer use cheap turbos... have to buy a brand new $1200 turbo. But yes, v-bands are nice.
Old May 26, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #79  
hustler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by j_man
Someone has to start calling FM, Begi and M-Tuned every day about switching their stuff to V-bands



I talked to FM about this on Sunday. They said they considered it because its a good idea, but they chose backward compatibility. If I had known what I know now, 2 years ago, I'd have v-bands and a tubular manifold.
Old May 26, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #80  
Machismo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,273
Total Cats: 1
From: Granbury, TX.
Default

Well, talked to ya Friday, but wanted to post here and just say "I love it when a plan comes together!"
Glad it's all you'd thought it would be and then some.
Now we just need to get mine boosted and I'll be in the same boat. I'm to the point, where I just don't think there's much left in my car where it stands now.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 PM.