Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

More computer talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 05:55 PM
  #21  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
9671111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,582
Total Cats: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Mach929
i'm with ya on this one, i haven't built anything up to date in a long time. I've been taking handmedowns for my systems. I used to be into games and always had a computer that could play all the new games, but when college hit i had no money or time. Now i've got an xbox360 and that does me just fine when i need to shoot some germans
What's it like in the stone age?
9671111 is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:16 AM
  #22  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01
Which will require DD3 I think and that makes your whole build another 200 bucks more expensive on average for maybe 10% more performance.

Have you seen comparos of the I7 to Q6600? Its like 10 - 15%, its pitiful, the price difference between the two makes it not worth it at all.
Yep, thats why I went the route I did. Same with my last build. I go for bang for buck, not all out performance for 10% performance for 50% more cost. The only thing my setup falls short on is benchmarks, which isnt real world. A system costing $500-$700 more than mine may only get 3-5fps more in games, and cut processing times on video software by 20-30 seconds on a 8-10 minute process. Not worth the cost at all in my opinion. I still would have liked the AMD 955 though. Like you said, it would have been $50 more for the processor, another $50 for a mobo, and another $100 for memory. Not worth the small gains. Intel still has AMD beat in performance, but AMD wins in value and upgradability, since their new processors still use the old AM2/AM2+ socket and DDR2 memory. Off to waste away my mind with some more Crysis!
NA6C-Guy is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:33 AM
  #23  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
UrbanSoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
Default

how are overclocked i7 cpus compare to overclocked q6600s?
UrbanSoot is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:38 AM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
UrbanSoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
Default





UrbanSoot is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:46 AM
  #25  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
UrbanSoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
Default

conclusion: your setup needs more water and more overclocking to reach your video cards potential.
UrbanSoot is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 02:58 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

New Home Entertainment storage subsystem installed yesterday:
Attached Thumbnails More computer talk-dsc_9230-small-.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 04:10 AM
  #27  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 45
Default

Originally Posted by UrbanSoot
conclusion: your setup needs more water and more overclocking to reach your video cards potential.
I don't plan to water cool this one. A good heatsink and fan will allow me to overclock to ~3.8 with a tiny voltage bump, but I like stock voltage and lower temps, so I will stick to 3.6 for now as my goal. I can run 3.6 now, but under 100% load it gets fast very quick. Of course you almost never see 100% or close to 100% in normal operation, but I still like knowing it can hold up to 100% loads. Mine peaks at about 60c after about 30 seconds of Prime95 and shuts down. Current idle temps at 3.4 are around 41c and under average loads (30%-50%) they hang around 48c-50c. A good cooler will drop them probably 5c at idle and 10c under load. I'm more suprised I haven't seen GPU temp issues like some have complained about with these more powerful ATI's. Mine is the Toxic Edition so it got the "Vapor Cooler" which is supposed to drop temps across the board by 10c or so. Alot of people have talked about 70c+ at loads, but I have yet to see mine go above 60c while playing Crysis. Have the fans turned to manuel and run them at about 50%, which is pretty quiet. They even have a slight overclock. So far, so good.
NA6C-Guy is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 09:34 AM
  #28  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,049
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

Man, oh man...

My first computer:


Second:


Third (first Intel-platform machine):


Fourth (back to C=):


First "real" machine I worked on:


This was bleeding-edge stuff for hardcore gamers when I was in college:


(insert 15 years worth of stuff here)

What I'm using now, which is considered pretty low-end:


It's rated at about 7,000 MFLOPS (seven billion floating point operations per second), which is thirty-one times the throughput of this:





"She's fast enough for ya, old man."
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 11:10 AM
  #29  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

My 1st

My 2nd (which I first got online with a 300baud manual modem.

My 3rd

My 4th

My 5th


Eventually


What I'm using at work



Joe started the hijack.
jayc72 is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 04:40 PM
  #30  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Stealth97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 66
Default

I rock a PC that is 650mhz, and does everything I need. I think its because I've built machines since the early 90's, a spec'd out machine was stupid expensive then, and I've learned I dont need the latest and greatest to do whatever. never mind that I havent played a computer game newer than about... 2003
Stealth97 is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 04:53 PM
  #31  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Newbsauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,299
Total Cats: 2
Default

I used to build PCs.. then I stopped playing PC games. I found that I always needed to upgrade to play the latest and greatest game. All that ended when I quit WOW, my last online game. Now, when I feel the need to game, I rock the PS3. I do miss the stupid crazy PVP that Ultima Online, WOW, or DAOC provided though :( UO being my personal favorite of course.
Newbsauce is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nick470
MEGAsquirt
7
06-16-2017 01:53 PM
Big_gumby
Meet and Greet
80
10-05-2015 04:06 PM



Quick Reply: More computer talk



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.