Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

new FM kits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2006, 10:31 PM
  #61  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

He built my DP for me when I was in a bind.
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 11:00 PM
  #62  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Al Hounos
It's not just the durability of the IC pipes that I question, its the fact that they are insulators, making the intercooler the only cooling the charge air gets. I don't know how significant it is, but I'd imagine metal IC piping cools the air slightly on its way into the IC.
I don't know how much the metal pipes will cool the charge when there is very little airflow over them and a high ambient temperature in the engine bay. I think any difference either way would be very difficult to measure.
jayc72 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 11:05 PM
  #63  
Ike
Junior Member
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jayc72
I don't know how much the metal pipes will cool the charge when there is very little airflow over them and a high ambient temperature in the engine bay. I think any difference either way would be very difficult to measure.
I have seen some compelling data and the heat transfer capacity of the metal pipes is quite suprising. True there is some heat from the engine, but not as much as you would think (because of air flow). If I had to use one of these silicone tubes, I would only use one on the intake manifold side of the intercooler. That way the air would be insulated from post-intercooler, engine heat.
Ike is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 11:16 PM
  #64  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

Care to share the data and the source?
jayc72 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 11:39 PM
  #65  
Ike
Junior Member
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jayc72
Care to share the data and the source?
You have a PM
Ike is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 02:47 AM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
bripab007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,450
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by Pitlab77
people in Texas do care about OBD II as of 2 years ago
Bummer. Is that all of Texas?
bripab007 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 05:38 AM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
timk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,278
Total Cats: 37
Default

No one has mentioned the GT3071R option yet, I'm suprised! Wonder how much power that thing makes and how much lag goes with it?
timk is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:12 AM
  #68  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
fmowry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 1,907
Total Cats: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Ike
I have seen some compelling data and the heat transfer capacity of the metal pipes is quite suprising. True there is some heat from the engine, but not as much as you would think (because of air flow). If I had to use one of these silicone tubes, I would only use one on the intake manifold side of the intercooler. That way the air would be insulated from post-intercooler, engine heat.
It's a moot point if you have a good intercooler. Now if the test is done with one of the smallish ICs Bell previously used, then it might make a difference.

I could bring up the smoother flow of the silicone vs the turbulence of the hard pipes/junctions, but in the grand scheme of making power, I think neither of these make a **** of a difference.

Frank
fmowry is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:34 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
bripab007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,450
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by fmowry
I could bring up the smoother flow of the silicone vs the turbulence of the hard pipes/junctions, but in the grand scheme of making power, I think neither of these make a **** of a difference.
I think they might make a **** of difference, but neither is enough to show a clear advantage/difference when comparing these two kits (BEGi and FM).
bripab007 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:00 AM
  #70  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
fmowry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 1,907
Total Cats: 6
Default

I did mean a **** of difference on these two setups. IMHO, between the two kits, the better one is the one with the better tuner.

Frank
fmowry is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:12 AM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
bripab007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,450
Total Cats: -1
Default

True that.

I think one big difference is the Hydra ECU that FM tunes/sells. It's a pretty effing powerful ECU...one on which I would be more comfortable spending upwards of $1G, in contrast to the Xede.
bripab007 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:32 AM
  #72  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

I should mention here that saying "BEGi's is better because Corky Bell says it is" is not really convicing compared to, say, an independent third party's evaluation of both setups.

Whoever wants to can: take an FM intercooler with the rubber piping and make an identical steel compressor outlet. Throw the car on the dyno and measure intercooler outlet temps in both cases.

I mean it probably is releasing heat but then the IC is less efficient (efficiency is proportional to temperature drop ratio).
y8s is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:35 AM
  #73  
Ike
Junior Member
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fmowry
I did mean a **** of difference on these two setups. IMHO, between the two kits, the better one is the one with the better tuner.

Frank
I call bullshit, unless you are shipping your car to FM to have the work done. Having a proficent tuner is great, if they can tune every car that has their kit. (Otherwise one base map is as good as another - think ballpark tune).

I'm not saying that FM's kit on a whole is better or worse, but hard parts to hard parts I'll take BEGi. Personally, I don't think I'm going to use either the Xede or Hydra, as my car is a 92 and has fewer emission restrictions. If I still had my 2000 I would choose the Xede (having OBDII compatibility is important to me). And I certainly wouldn't just slap it in there and call it a day...I would have it tuned on a dyno.

Last edited by Ike; 11-08-2006 at 10:57 AM.
Ike is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:41 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
brgracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 1,275
Total Cats: 1
Default

More competition = better prices/more innovation/more testing/etc... = GOOD. Nuff' said.

I like Pepsi, you like Coke....
brgracer is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:52 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sammamish, Washington
Posts: 1,396
Total Cats: 0
Default

I am sure the 3071 spools just fine. That the turbo to go with if you want over 300 whp. Having a full 3" downpipe and exhaust behind it will help alot though as will having a properly dialed in EBC.
Kelly is offline  
Old 02-22-2007, 02:18 PM
  #76  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
AbeFM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 12
Default

I'd probably take Corky's judgement over FM's if they both rated two 3rd party vendors - obviously everyone will like their own stuff better. Both companies would rather see you spend your money with them - but in truth, both of them will help you with the other guy's products.

I've had some helpful advice from Corky, and TONS from both Bill and Keith. So much so that there's thousands I haven't spent with FM on account of it. They've eaten the cost on stuff when it was as much my fault as theirs (like when they sent me +1mm rings, but like a buttmonkey I didn't measure them and forced them into my block, destroying them). In short, I'd say the biggest problem with FM is their prices - and that's from a customer's point of view - from a neutral point of view they are doing just fine.

I'd love to see testing with the silicone hoses - they are NOT cheap to make, and perhaps the heat retention is offset by the smoother flow. Anything is better than the IC set up from their old kit.

We'll see if Corky helps me out with a EO plate. Apparently he and Bill don't agree on if my car is legal. :-)
AbeFM is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 12:49 PM
  #77  
Former Vendor
 
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bell Tuning & Performance
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -99
Default

Originally Posted by AbeFM
but in truth, both of them will help you with the other guy's products.
I know of several instances in which FM has refused to help a customer with any part we sell or support on it.

We'll see if Corky helps me out with a EO plate. Apparently he and Bill don't agree on if my car is legal. :-)
I have a copy of the EO papers, and I believe they could be looked up online too. If you'd like to send me a photo of your car, I would happy to be the 3rd interpretation.
Stephanie
Stephanie Turner is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 01:03 PM
  #78  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cueball1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 3,875
Total Cats: 2
Default

Tsk Tsk Stephanie! Leave the FM bashing to us the consumers. Don't stoop to our level. Your company is well loved, respected and appreciated on this forum.
cueball1 is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 01:45 PM
  #79  
Former Vendor
 
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bell Tuning & Performance
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -99
Default

I was not FM bashing, I promise! I apologize if it sounded like I meant something else. That was not the message I was trying to convey. On the flip side, I have referred a person w/ a link to someone else who would do a much better job at tuning than I.
Stephanie
Stephanie Turner is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 08:26 PM
  #80  
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
magnamx-5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: nowhere
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
Default

no cueball is wrong you might have a vested interest in the debate but, you and the rest of begi have a ton more experience in dealing with FM. So i apreciate your opinion Stephanie. That is the whole point of us comming here to voice our opinions, and help others find the best solution. 35
magnamx-5 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
09-12-2016 08:17 PM
JxPhan
Meet and Greet
3
10-02-2015 02:17 AM
lsc224
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
10-01-2015 09:17 AM
drumman83
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
2
09-25-2015 07:03 PM
DonPlatt
WTB
0
09-25-2015 02:57 AM



Quick Reply: new FM kits



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.