Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

new TT Taurus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
zoomin's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
From: where most people are Utarded
Default new TT Taurus

2010 Ford Taurus SHO
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #2  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

James: Great news, everyone!

Richard: What's that?

James: Ford has unveiled the new Taurus saloon!

Jeremy: That's brilliant!

Richard: Wait, what?

Jeremy: Right, moving on then...

Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #3  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Do not want.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:21 PM
  #4  
budget racer's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 717
Total Cats: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

well, it's the best looking taurus to date. but that isn't saying much.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #5  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

365hp 3.5L v6 stock = Win. I say this might be a step in the right direction for ford. The old SHO Taurus's were ******* badass back then.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #6  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
365hp 3.5L v6 stock = Win. I say this might be a step in the right direction for ford. The old SHO Taurus's were ******* badass back then.
Yeah, deffinately nice numbers but I didn't see anywhere in that article (unless I missed) how much that thing is going to way and I suspect alot. GM isn't doing as well as they hoped they would with the G8 and it's IMO a MUCH better looking car and probably more fun to drive being rwd Vs awd.

We need more lite weight sports cars, not overweight pigs.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #7  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Introduced in 1989, Taurus SHO was conceived as a discreet performance-oriented sports sedan, ideally suited to the automotive enthusiast needing the room and capability of a four-door full-size car. Produced through 1999, more than 100,000 were sold.
It's not a light weight sports car I'm sure. It probably weighs 3200-3400 pounds. But for what it is, a 4 door sedan, that's badass. We all might like light weight haul-*** cars, but most people in the real world have to drive a 4 door and haul their kids around, get groceries, and etc. For a DD, I'd drive one. I've actually ALWAYS wanted to find an old SHO taurus that wasn't beat to death for a dd. The old ones were VERY fun to drive, don't know if you ever drove one before. They were not a heavy slow pig.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #8  
SamS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,269
Total Cats: 7
From: Wisconsin
Default

But look at the torque curve!



2010 Ford Taurus SHO: Live And With A Ridiculous Torque Curve
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #9  
The_Pipefather's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 15
From: Troy, MI
Default

Compared to a E39 5 series which is in the same weight range or higher, I would say they ARE a heavy slow pig. Of course, they are way cheaper, but there is no reason why Ford shouldn't have had the dynamics tuned as well.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 04:46 PM
  #10  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Good god! Dammmmn.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #11  
Vashthestampede's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,564
Total Cats: 58
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Its also has a 6speed and AWD. Not bad at all.

Vash-
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #12  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Come on people, this is the best thing with the blue oval put out in the last few decades this side of the Atlantic.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 06:21 PM
  #13  
papasmurf's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Total Cats: 0
From: Utah County
Default

Wasn't the original SHO engine sourced from Yamaha? I never got to drive one, but I understand it was a fun 'revving' car. I see they threw in an ecotec into the new taurus, good engine.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #14  
GT3man2001's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 222
Total Cats: 0
From: GJ, CO
Default

Originally Posted by papasmurf
Wasn't the original SHO engine sourced from Yamaha? I never got to drive one, but I understand it was a fun 'revving' car. I see they threw in an ecotec into the new taurus, good engine.
NOT ecotec. That's GM.

EcoBoost is Ford's thing, and they plan on putting a turbo engine in every car they make. Yay Ford.

Oh, and GM just announced that they are not designing any more performance cars effective immediately.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #15  
papasmurf's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Total Cats: 0
From: Utah County
Default

Originally Posted by GT3man2001
NOT ecotec. That's GM.

EcoBoost is Ford's thing, and they plan on putting a turbo engine in every car they make.
LOL, yea, ecotec is definitely GM. The "eco" in ecoboost threw me off. This shows my lack of knowledge to domestics.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #16  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by papasmurf
Wasn't the original SHO engine sourced from Yamaha? I never got to drive one, but I understand it was a fun 'revving' car. I see they threw in an ecotec into the new taurus, good engine.
Yes, it was a quad cam V6 yamaha built, and they detuned it for the old SHO. With a set of cams and a tune, those motors will make power to 7-8K. Yamaha also designed their original modular V8 as well. At the time Yamaha needed money and Ford needed a good engine, and they made a trade. Kept yamaha alive and ford got a few fantastic engines out of it.

As mentioned, this new motor is all Ford's. Go ford if they really make a turbo motor for every ford they sell.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #17  
zoomin's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
From: where most people are Utarded
Default

The early v6 SHO motors loved being supercharged, I have seen them with close to 450whp on the stock block.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #18  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

I was going to say sign me up for the AWD wagon, but then I saw the price. $40K for a Taurus is .... a lot.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #19  
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
From: NJ
Default

no way i'd pay $40k for a ford either. it looks a lot better than the new mustang though.
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #20  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

Hate to say it Pat, but Yamaha didn't need the money and their building engines for Ford did not keep them alive. In fact, during that time they were acquiring other companies and building another assembly plant here in GA.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 PM.