Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

One more reason to stay here

Old Oct 27, 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #21  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

^ Theft is mt.net taking a sponsor away from m.net,not blocking useless **** on the site.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #22  
KPLAFIN's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
From: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Default

Elesjuan, you trying to get in on the ban action too?
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #23  
elesjuan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

:bowr ofl:


Originally Posted by Gary J Fischman
As far as I'm concerned, blocking advertising is theft of service. It costs us money for you to view the site. Contrary to the opinion of some, the Internet is not the same as broadcast TV or Radio. With TV or Radio, there is no incremental cost for 1 additional viewer. But with the Internet, there is. Each additional reader uses CPU cycles, bandwidth, disk space for logs, etc. We've already taken a major hit over the past few years due to adblockers that have caused our delivered banner impressions to drop, despite a rise in readership.

So - I'll say again - adblockers are theft of service. Please either support the site, or put up with the ads.

Holy hell, I'm about to die!! Gary really is a complete ******* TOOLBAG!!!


The fagbox already deleted my post... IB hes writing a PM right meow..
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #24  
KPLAFIN's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
From: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Default

Originally Posted by elesjuan
:bowr ofl:





Holy hell, I'm about to die!! Gary really is a complete ******* TOOLBAG!!!
Your post is gone already...jeez
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #25  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by spike
How is that stealing?

Gary & his band of monkies are seriously fucked in the head.
You retarded? How is it not stealing?

You do understand how sites like this site and M.net make money, right? They deliver ads. Just like network television makes their money on ad revenue, just like every sports team and every racing team/series in the world. Advertising is one of the largest industries in the world.

I don't really care if you block ads, although Gary disagrees vehemently. The way I see it is that if you are installing adblockers, you wouldn't be clicking ads anwyay. Telling other people how to get around it, though, is crossing the line. How would you feel if you dropped $1k+ on bandwidth every month for a forum, and then put up ads to recoup some of the costs, only to have your members laugh about blocking the ads that support the site?

Stop being dicks about it. Christ, half of us pay $30/year or more for this site. Cough up the $20 over there, or shut the **** up.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #26  
Trent's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,651
Total Cats: 39
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Just like network television makes their money on ad revenue
oh man, NBC would love to talk to my DVR then, because I don't put up with ads there either.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #27  
deliverator's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 731
Total Cats: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

Adblock + Firefox + Filterset.g

is vastly superior to just

Adblock + Firefox
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #28  
KPLAFIN's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
From: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Default

Originally Posted by supersaiyan93
oh man, NBC would love to talk to my DVR then, because I don't put up with ads there either.
National Barack Channel would have a **** fit if they knew that. They only tolerate DVR because they think people get them so they can watch double commercials.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #29  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
You retarded? How is it not stealing?

You do understand how sites like this site and M.net make money, right? They deliver ads. Just like network television makes their money on ad revenue, just like every sports team and every racing team/series in the world. Advertising is one of the largest industries in the world.

I don't really care if you block ads, although Gary disagrees vehemently. The way I see it is that if you are installing adblockers, you wouldn't be clicking ads anwyay. Telling other people how to get around it, though, is crossing the line. How would you feel if you dropped $1k+ on bandwidth every month for a forum, and then put up ads to recoup some of the costs, only to have your members laugh about blocking the ads that support the site?

Stop being dicks about it. Christ, half of us pay $30/year or more for this site. Cough up the $20 over there, or shut the **** up.
Whatever,do your modding over there,not here.

It's not really stealing,it's more like freedom of choice.People choose to view the adds or not.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #30  
elesjuan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
You retarded? How is it not stealing?

You do understand how sites like this site and M.net make money, right? They deliver ads. Just like network television makes their money on ad revenue, just like every sports team and every racing team/series in the world. Advertising is one of the largest industries in the world.

I don't really care if you block ads, although Gary disagrees vehemently. The way I see it is that if you are installing adblockers, you wouldn't be clicking ads anwyay. Telling other people how to get around it, though, is crossing the line. How would you feel if you dropped $1k+ on bandwidth every month for a forum, and then put up ads to recoup some of the costs, only to have your members laugh about blocking the ads that support the site?

Stop being dicks about it. Christ, half of us pay $30/year or more for this site. Cough up the $20 over there, or shut the **** up.

Whether you care or not, I respect you here.. But take that bullshit back to M.net. I would bet you that Gary makes PROFIT from m.net off the 20+ forum sponsors and subscriptions from members, muchless paying out for bandwidth and servers.

Do you have a DVR? Do you ever find yourself fastforwarding through commercials? I do. Am I stealing my television now? Oh wait, I don't pay for cable anyway. Oops. Yeah, I spend 3$ a month to support this site because I know my money is going to something good, not to fatten up that toolbox's wallet.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #31  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Originally Posted by elesjuan
Whether you care or not, I respect you here.. But take that bullshit back to M.net. I would bet you that Gary makes PROFIT from m.net off the 20+ forum sponsors and subscriptions from members, muchless paying out for bandwidth and servers.

Do you have a DVR? Do you ever find yourself fastforwarding through commercials? I do. Am I stealing my television now? Oh wait, I don't pay for cable anyway. Oops. Yeah, I spend 3$ a month to support this site because I know my money is going to something good, not to fatten up that toolbox's wallet.
Very well said,I could not agree with you more.

Gary already makes more than enough money to support that site,he's just plain greedy and wants more money.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #32  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Rules are only as good as they are enforcable. Fischman can't currently enforce the non-use of adblockers so therefore he can't enforce the rule.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #33  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
Rules are only as good as they are enforcable. Fischman can't currently enforce the non-use of adblockers so therefore he can't enforce the rule.
.....but according to some people it's stealing!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #34  
KPLAFIN's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
From: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Default

Originally Posted by spike
.....but according to some people it's stealing!!!!!!!!!!!
We're all no good dirty thieves, I just new Miata's were turning into the new Civic.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #35  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by spike
.....but according to some people it's stealing!!!!!!!!!!!
that site steals my soul. can we call it even?
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #36  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
that site steals my soul. can we call it even?
I don't know.....you will have to talk to Gary about that one.

Then again,he would acuse you of being a thief anyways,so why bother.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #37  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by elesjuan
Whether you care or not, I respect you here.. But take that bullshit back to M.net. I would bet you that Gary makes PROFIT from m.net off the 20+ forum sponsors and subscriptions from members, muchless paying out for bandwidth and servers.
Yeah, I'd bet he does make a profit. Most good businesses do. What confuses me is when he tries to increase the profits of his business, suddenly he's a greedy ****?

Originally Posted by spike
Gary already makes more than enough money to support that site,he's just plain greedy and wants more money.
This drives me ******* nuts, and not just in this case. Gary doesn't run M.net out of the goodness of his heart and his wallet. He runs it as a business. None of the advertising he runs on that site makes him greedy; it makes him a good businessman. This is like saying the owner of Facebook is a greedy shitstain because he runs ads on the side of the page, or Google as a company is greedy because nearly 100% of their revenue is ad-based.

Is Rick (the owner of this site) just plain greedy because he added an enormous banner for non-subscribers, a bunch of in-forum advertising at the bottom of the page, and Google ads? No. He's a businessman.

Here's an interesting note: I poked around, curious as to how Mozilla makes any money at all.

-85% of the revenue that Mozilla made in 2006 was from Google, which paid them $57m to include the Google Toolbar as the default search engine in their browser.
-Google's net revenue from advertising in 2006 was $10.492b (yes, billion) dollars in 2006. This represents 99% of Google's total revenue.
-You could argue that the single company most affected by Firefox's AdBlock plugin is Google
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #38  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Sav,it's one thing to run a good business and provide the user with a good product(mozilla & google),it's totally different when Gary is charging the money he does and at the same time providing a now shitty forum(not what it use to be a few years ago)and expect people to be happy with it.

M.net had/has alot of potential,gary just needs to thin out the morons he elected as mods and get decent understanding people to do the job and let rules bend a little.
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:28 PM
  #39  
elesjuan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by spike
Sav,it's one thing to run a good business and provide the user with a good product(mozilla & google),it's totally different when Gary is charging the money he does and at the same time providing a now shitty forum(not what it use to be a few years ago)and expect people to be happy with it.

M.net had/has alot of potential,gary just needs to thin out the morons he elected as mods and get decent understanding people to do the job and let rules bend a little.
And kick the 3rd Reich moderation policy...
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #40  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.