Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

36-2 trigger wheel made my car immortal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
Wingman703's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 600
Total Cats: 648
From: Atlanta, GA
Default 36-2 trigger wheel made my car immortal

In an effort to solve some other MS/trigger related issues on my car(BP4W swapped into a 94 chassis, MS2), I installed a 36-2 trigger wheel. After changing the needed settings, firing the engine, checking base timing, and verifying all the crank/cam signals, I decided to unplug the cam sensor with the engine still running to verify my signal logs. To my suprise, the engine did not immediately die as I had expected, but ran and rev'ed without any hiccups.
Is the cam sensor no longer needed on a BP4W if a 36-2 wheel is installed? Is the cam sensor only used to find sync during startup? Would I run into issues running without the cam sensor under high load/RPM or some other condition?
I am running sequential injection and wasted spark.

I ask this because I have an adjustable cam wheel on the exhaust cam, but my cam sensor would never read the adjustable wheel on the intake side, so I was stuck with the stock cam wheel. Not needing the cam sensor would allow me to install my adjustable cam wheel on the intake side for that 2HP gain and +10 street cred.
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
Ted75zcar's Avatar
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,873
Total Cats: 383
From: Boulder, CO
Default

You won't get sequential without a CAM trigger. The MS defaults to wasted spark/batch when it loses sync.

Edit: minor ninja
Old Nov 7, 2019 | 03:10 PM
  #3  
Wingman703's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 600
Total Cats: 648
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

So when I remove the CAM signal, the ECU drops back into batch, then automatically reverts to sequential when the CAM signal returns?
I guess I'm just surprised MS could do that so quickly and seamlessly.
Old Nov 7, 2019 | 05:12 PM
  #4  
DaWaN's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 204
Total Cats: 29
From: Netherlands, Europe
Default

Originally Posted by Wingman703
So when I remove the CAM signal, the ECU drops back into batch, then automatically reverts to sequential when the CAM signal returns?
I guess I'm just surprised MS could do that so quickly and seamlessly.
The CAM signal is only used to determine the engine cycle. The crank sensor is used to keep in sync with the engine and time all the injection and ignition events.
As soon as the ECU synchronizes on the engine cycle it does not need the CAM signal any more.
Old Nov 8, 2019 | 04:26 AM
  #5  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

Like others have said before, the ECU only uses the cam signal during startup to switch to sequential. After it switches to sequential, the signal from the cam is no longer needed so unplugging the sensor makes no difference until you either shut it off or the engine loses sync from a bad crank signal. You won't get a sync loss from a bad cam signal once it is sequential.
Old Mar 2, 2022 | 01:54 PM
  #6  
nachomiata's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wingman703
In an effort to solve some other MS/trigger related issues on my car(BP4W swapped into a 94 chassis, MS2), I installed a 36-2 trigger wheel. After changing the needed settings, firing the engine, checking base timing, and verifying all the crank/cam signals, I decided to unplug the cam sensor with the engine still running to verify my signal logs. To my suprise, the engine did not immediately die as I had expected, but ran and rev'ed without any hiccups.
Is the cam sensor no longer needed on a BP4W if a 36-2 wheel is installed? Is the cam sensor only used to find sync during startup? Would I run into issues running without the cam sensor under high load/RPM or some other condition?
I am running sequential injection and wasted spark.

I ask this because I have an adjustable cam wheel on the exhaust cam, but my cam sensor would never read the adjustable wheel on the intake side, so I was stuck with the stock cam wheel. Not needing the cam sensor would allow me to install my adjustable cam wheel on the intake side for that 2HP gain and +10 street cred.
slightly out of topic, what sensor are you running with this and how is it wired in? I have a 36-2 installed on my BP4W swapped 96 but I read that you’ll have to use a different sensor/wire it into the CAS
Old Mar 2, 2022 | 02:10 PM
  #7  
Wingman703's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 600
Total Cats: 648
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by nachomiata
slightly out of topic, what sensor are you running with this and how is it wired in? I have a 36-2 installed on my BP4W swapped 96 but I read that you’ll have to use a different sensor/wire it into the CAS
I used all BP4W OEM sensors, so an OEM crank sensor, and OEM cam sensor. My chassis was a '94 so I used the VVT swap thread for wiring information and wired both as needed into the OEM wiring.
Old Mar 2, 2022 | 02:41 PM
  #8  
nachomiata's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wingman703
I used all BP4W OEM sensors, so an OEM crank sensor, and OEM cam sensor. My chassis was a '94 so I used the VVT swap thread for wiring information and wired both as needed into the OEM wiring.
Is your MS2 a DIY or a PNP2 unit made for your chassis?
Old Mar 2, 2022 | 07:49 PM
  #9  
Wingman703's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 600
Total Cats: 648
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

At that point I think it was a DIY MS2 unit for a '94. The wiring remains the same weather it is a DIY or PNP unit.
Old Mar 3, 2022 | 07:51 PM
  #10  
Stock's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Sorry for the hijack but I'm too sad and desperate to care.

So if my VVT swapped 95 is experiencing sync loss, id be better looking to the crank sensor than the cam sensor, as the ECU no longer references cam signal after startup?
Old Mar 3, 2022 | 08:03 PM
  #11  
Ted75zcar's Avatar
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,873
Total Cats: 383
From: Boulder, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Stock
Sorry for the hijack but I'm too sad and desperate to care.

So if my VVT swapped 95 is experiencing sync loss, id be better looking to the crank sensor than the cam sensor, as the ECU no longer references cam signal after startup?
VVT uses cam position at all times. You should be able to tell which sensor is losing sync with the high speed logger or I believe the status field.
Old Mar 6, 2022 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
hector's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 913
Total Cats: 217
From: Hollywood, FL
Default

I think it's time for a sticky thread that points to the connector issues on VVT engines at the cam sensor. It's real simple: heat/age at the connector will give a really noisy signal that MS decoders have real trouble with and even factory ecu can't deal with all the time. Get rid of the factory connector and solder wires directly to the cam sensor (it's one bolt to remove) or solder a pigtail with a connector directly to the sensor with whatever three wire connector you want. Like this https://www.etsy.com/listing/1123863...m-angle-sensor

The issue was figured out years ago by the Spec Miata boys and posted on this website by a forum member which I can't remember but am eternally grateful to. I wish I could find that thread but my search skills suck.

Anyhow, I think this issue definitely deserves a sticky. A one post thread with the snip from the thread that had the SM solution would be all that's needed.

edit, so you get a better mental picture: From the SCCA/NASA rules, here is the relevant regulation.
SCCA 9.1.7.1.o.9/NASA 12.17.1: An electrical pigtail ranging from 3” to 6” in length and terminated with any 3 pin electrical connector may be soldered and potted to the OEM cam sensor for the purpose of correcting a known issue with the factory connection. The factory harness connector may be removed and replaced with the appropriate mating connector.

2nd edit: from mazdaracers where the SM boys do their thing https://mazdaracers.com/topic/5310-c...or-issues-fix/

Last edited by hector; Mar 6, 2022 at 09:14 AM. Reason: more useful info, hopefully
Old Mar 6, 2022 | 09:31 AM
  #13  
stevos555's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 501
Total Cats: -8
From: Chicago
Default

this is the wiring
Attached Thumbnails 36-2 trigger wheel made my car immortal-photo851.jpg  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darbymx5
AEM
5
Jun 7, 2016 03:11 PM
Oscar
MEGAsquirt
12
Jul 28, 2014 06:23 AM
hustler
MEGAsquirt
44
Sep 3, 2012 01:09 PM
yellowihss
MEGAsquirt
27
Feb 21, 2012 02:49 PM
slowmx5
ECUs and Tuning
90
Jul 18, 2009 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.