MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

A better Spark Out circuit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2009, 06:39 PM
  #61  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Joe alluded that some igniters have capacitive inputs, and I was curious which ones.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 06:58 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
WestfieldMX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
Does this mean remove the two red wires below the surface of the board? Ex. PAD1 and IACB2B en PAD3 and X ?
Desolder doesn't mean remove. Just desolder one end of the wires.
WestfieldMX5 is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 02:40 AM
  #63  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by f_devocht
Desolder doesn't mean remove. Just desolder one end of the wires.
I'm not an electrical engineer, but leave a conductive wire loose to short circuit whenever it feels happy to? No thank you.

Plus, it says desolder the jumpers, now that doesn't mean desolder only half of each jumper either.

I want Joe or Matt to chime in here before I wreck my MSPNP.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 05:31 AM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
WestfieldMX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 73
Default

If you don't understand that, you shouldn't be allowed to own a soldering iron.
WestfieldMX5 is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 05:37 AM
  #65  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by f_devocht
If you don't understand that, you shouldn't be allowed to own a soldering iron.
I shouldn't be allowed lots of things. Care to explain? What do I do witht he wire after I desolder one end?
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 07-17-2009, 10:14 AM
  #66  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

So, help me out here guys. I have the NPNs in my hand and the board ripped open. So do I just remove the red jumper wires or what?
Attached Thumbnails A better Spark Out circuit.-17072009104.jpg   A better Spark Out circuit.-17072009103.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 07-17-2009, 10:17 AM
  #67  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

DIY's instructions couldn't be simpler. desolder the two jumpers going to PAD1 and PAD3. do not remove them, just desolder them at that spot. insert the transistors, then solder the red jumpers back to the transistors in the correct spots per the instructions. the end. simple 5 minute fix.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-17-2009, 10:49 AM
  #68  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Ah, fawk, now that I've actually read the instructions I understand what they mean. So it's done:
Attached Thumbnails A better Spark Out circuit.-17072009105.jpg   A better Spark Out circuit.-17072009106.jpg   A better Spark Out circuit.-17072009107.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 09:50 AM
  #69  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,593
Default

Hey, guys. I've been around on sporadically for the past few weeks, so I'm playing catchup on old posts.

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Joe alluded that some igniters have capacitive inputs, and I was curious which ones.
Here is my observation of a stock 1.6 igniter & coils being driven by an EMU. Yellow is trigger volts from the EMU, blue is coil primary amps.



I haven't actually dissected the igniter to inspect it, but you can see why I have inferred that the input has a high capacitance.
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 07-18-2009, 12:10 PM
  #70  
Elite Member
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Ahhh, that's not load capacitance you see. If it were capacitive you wouldn't have a step up in the igniter input (yellow) voltage (at the start) because a capacitor would need a very large spike in current to do that.

The rising igniter drive voltage with increasing primary current that you see is probably due to a current sense resistor scheme in the igniter circuit. (Such an architecture in driving inductive loads is quite common) The scheme accomplishes 2 things - a current limit if dwell is too long, in order to protect the main igniter transistor, and a means for the ECU to be able to sense the primary current by looking at the igniter drive voltage. Presumably some factory ECUs can dynamically adjust dwell time vs. system voltage, akin to having long term fuel trims.


Nevertheless whatever drive circuit you have for the igniter input, it would have to be capable of delivering the max input voltage (top of yellow) and the input current at that point, at a dwell > max needed (iow reaches current limit). I noticed that if you have insufficient drive, the max current (i.e. current limit setpoint), goes down. In the thread where I described the COP measurements, I give these values - these values give you a maximum allowable pullup resistance for a given pullup voltage.

Clear?
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-30-2009, 09:10 AM
  #71  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

First report: car didn't blow up while powering MSPNP, changing Spark Output Invert = YES and recycling and replugging the ignitor. Haven't crancked yet, other stuff to finish first.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 07-30-2009, 04:35 PM
  #72  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
First report: car didn't blow up while powering MSPNP, changing Spark Output Invert = YES and recycling and replugging the ignitor. Haven't crancked yet, other stuff to finish first.
Car cranks, idles and revs fine. Mission accomplished
.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 04:54 AM
  #73  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Can't believe how happy I am that the car no longer pops after sitting for a few hours. This mod is amazing and should be incorporated in the MSPNP board!
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 08-10-2009, 07:14 PM
  #74  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
Can't believe how happy I am that the car no longer pops after sitting for a few hours. This mod is amazing and should be incorporated in the MSPNP board!
Do you have anymore issues with plugs fouling? I'm trying to figure out if this popping is what is fouling my plugs or the fuel (leak?) issue that is giving the plugs something to ignite...

My Popping and fouling has gotten fairly severe lately and i've been intentionally not performing joe's better spark out circuit assuming it has been letting me know that something else is wrong. If this pop is actually what is causing my fouling, then I need to do it.
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 01:46 AM
  #75  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
Do you have anymore issues with plugs fouling? I'm trying to figure out if this popping is what is fouling my plugs or the fuel (leak?) issue that is giving the plugs something to ignite...

My Popping and fouling has gotten fairly severe lately and i've been intentionally not performing joe's better spark out circuit assuming it has been letting me know that something else is wrong. If this pop is actually what is causing my fouling, then I need to do it.
No more popping nor fouling. Cold and hot starts are awesome now, given that I stop messing with Crank and ASE (which I messed with before because of the popping). But this is the final solution. The board design was just crappy and this is a much better output circuit.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 02:00 AM
  #76  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
AbeFM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 12
Default

The board design doesn't accommodate two spark channels at all. :-) remember, that was a mod in the first place.
AbeFM is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 02:05 AM
  #77  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by AbeFM
The board design doesn't accommodate two spark channels at all. :-) remember, that was a mod in the first place.
Remember? No, I changed my major partly because of electronics/digital systems
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 09:33 AM
  #78  
Boost Pope
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,593
Default

Yeah, as designed, the rev 3.0 board does not accommodate any logic-level ignition outputs, and only one high-current ignition output. Remember, this thing was mostly conceived by guys with old V8 engines running distributors.

So the "traditional" two-channel ignition output (soldering the two resistors across the LEDs) is a mod, and then my circuit is a mod to a mod. The problem is that whoever came up with that mod in the first place (and it's been years, so who the heck knows where it originally came from) was either lazy, cheap, or just didn't take the time to really think about how the circuit was going to behave in-situ.
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 08-11-2009, 10:57 AM
  #79  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
wayne_curr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
No more popping nor fouling. Cold and hot starts are awesome now, given that I stop messing with Crank and ASE (which I messed with before because of the popping). But this is the final solution. The board design was just crappy and this is a much better output circuit.
Thats amazing. In my mind, the fouling was just due to the fuel in the cyls that was fascilitating the pop. I guess something specifically about the pop is whats fouling them. I'm doing this friday night for sure. Gotta go get a new tip for my soldering iron.
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 11:14 AM
  #80  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

I guess something specifically about the pop is whats fouling them
Yeah the incomplete burn....
Laur3ns is offline  


Quick Reply: A better Spark Out circuit.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.