re-adjust AFR table after Dyno Tuning?
05-27-2010, 04:43 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 74
Total Cats: -4
re-adjust AFR table after Dyno Tuning?
I put the car on a Mustang Dyno & spent a few hours tuning. I had EGO turned off of course.
Now if I turn EGO back on, it will pull the AFR's away from what we did on the dyno.
Am I correct that I have to just "try to match the dyno tune" on my AFR table now? Or is there an easy way to deal with this?
Now if I turn EGO back on, it will pull the AFR's away from what we did on the dyno.
Am I correct that I have to just "try to match the dyno tune" on my AFR table now? Or is there an easy way to deal with this?
Reply
0
0
05-27-2010, 04:54 PM
#3
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
1) output 1 or 2 are incorrectly configured
2) you don't have the best ground points for all 4-grounds in question (heater, signal, gauge signal, computer)
3) VE table is wrong
4) EGO switchpoint is wrong
5) differnet load on the street than the track
6) sensor is getting hot
7) FMIC heatsoak
A long 5th gear pull looks a little leaner than 3rd gear when I'm on the track. That's what spark table "head-room" is for, brah.
2) you don't have the best ground points for all 4-grounds in question (heater, signal, gauge signal, computer)
3) VE table is wrong
4) EGO switchpoint is wrong
5) differnet load on the street than the track
6) sensor is getting hot
7) FMIC heatsoak
A long 5th gear pull looks a little leaner than 3rd gear when I'm on the track. That's what spark table "head-room" is for, brah.
Reply
0
0
05-27-2010, 05:24 PM
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 74
Total Cats: -4
I don't understand your comment about the EGO's own table. Doesn't it look at the AFR target table? or is that what you meant?
& Hustler... did you post in the wrong thread or am I REALLY confused?
Reply
0
0
05-28-2010, 02:15 AM
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 74
Total Cats: -4
Okay... maybe when on the dyno I made a mistake? I thought that EGO should be turned off while dyno tuning, and so it was off. So the car was tuned as the tuner wanted it, not tuned to the AFR target table I had.
Is this not the way it is usually done?
So now my AFR target tables do not match my tuning.
I guess I need something like TunerStudios VE Analyze Live in reverse to develop a target table from the tune. I'm pretty sure a program like that does not exist, so what I was asking is, Is there some easy way to create an AFR Target table that matches the existing tune or must I experiment till I get it right?
Is this not the way it is usually done?
So now my AFR target tables do not match my tuning.
I guess I need something like TunerStudios VE Analyze Live in reverse to develop a target table from the tune. I'm pretty sure a program like that does not exist, so what I was asking is, Is there some easy way to create an AFR Target table that matches the existing tune or must I experiment till I get it right?
Reply
0
0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
