Who else is running a 1.8L w/ the msPNP
Just curious cause i just installed mine and was using the base map included w/ the msPNP for a 1.6L w/ afm. I changed the req fuel and left it at that for now. Will hopefully get a good bit of data logging tomorrow. Any suggestions would be nice so i can make it run better. 94 engine w/ jackson cold air intake on 89 octane.
That's cool. Install your IAT sensor so you can pull the AFM.
I am... though it might not be the exact same setup you're running
__________________
Jerry a.k.a. 'FoundSoul'
DIYAutoTune.com
'91 Miata BEGi S3 GT2560 w/ MSPNP - 14.1psi - 253whp, 232wtq
'95 Miata n/a
A few other cars....
Jerry a.k.a. 'FoundSoul'
DIYAutoTune.com
'91 Miata BEGi S3 GT2560 w/ MSPNP - 14.1psi - 253whp, 232wtq
'95 Miata n/a
A few other cars....
Just curious cause i just installed mine and was using the base map included w/ the msPNP for a 1.6L w/ afm. I changed the req fuel and left it at that for now. Will hopefully get a good bit of data logging tomorrow. Any suggestions would be nice so i can make it run better. 94 engine w/ jackson cold air intake on 89 octane.
I'm pretty sure he has a 1.8 in a 90-93. That should still be esentially PNP.
YES, but it's entirely possible to run a 1.8 motor off 1.6 electronics in a 90-93. IE transplant a 1.8 into an originally 1.6 car. If the stock ecu runs it, there's no reason why an aftermarket ecu wouldn't.
No, I wouldn't expect the 1.6 PNP to work in a 1.8 car.
No, I wouldn't expect the 1.6 PNP to work in a 1.8 car.
I didnt think of the 1.8 swap. That would make sense to why the mspnp work. I wish the OP would respond.
i have a 94 motor running off of a 90-93 wiring harness, which is not uncommon? so the mspnp is still pnp sorry for the confusion I thought it was straightforward. Yes i also need to get my IAT hooked up too ben
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








