99 cracked head 80k miles $100
Looks like Thomas18 is now refusing to refund.
From a PM:
"I jsut talked with my mechanic. He said the head should still run fine after the cracked is fixed. In fact, the head had been running in my car for a year. I had no problem with it. at this point, since the head could still run fine after cracked is fixed, i would not accept return."
Sorry bud. This head is not still usable. You need a better mechanic, and I need my money back.
From a PM:
"I jsut talked with my mechanic. He said the head should still run fine after the cracked is fixed. In fact, the head had been running in my car for a year. I had no problem with it. at this point, since the head could still run fine after cracked is fixed, i would not accept return."
Sorry bud. This head is not still usable. You need a better mechanic, and I need my money back.
Did you pay with paypal? File a claim asap. Hopefully you didn't send money as a gift. This is ridiculous and is totally unacceptable. He probably didn't know about it considering the way he puts stuff together on his own car, but that is total crap. I hope you get it sorted out
Damn, that sucks. One of the reasons that I only deal with people that have been around for a bit and have positive feedback.
There's no way that any mechanic could say that head was good.
There's no way that any mechanic could say that head was good.
The Paypal dispute has been filed. The seller originally wanted me to setup as a gift, but I didn't feel comfortable without any protection. Luckily, I paid the extra 3% Paypal fees and hopefully have some recourse available.
I do think it is strange that if I ship this back to the seller and get a refund provided that:
1) The seller has his useless part back and is out no money (Net zero for transaction)
2) The buyer has no part, and is out $50 for shipping it back to the seller (net -$50)
How is that fair?
I do think it is strange that if I ship this back to the seller and get a refund provided that:
1) The seller has his useless part back and is out no money (Net zero for transaction)
2) The buyer has no part, and is out $50 for shipping it back to the seller (net -$50)
How is that fair?
I do think it is strange that if I ship this back to the seller and get a refund provided that:
1) The seller has his useless part back and is out no money (Net zero for transaction)
2) The buyer has no part, and is out $50 for shipping it back to the seller (net -$50)
How is that fair?
1) The seller has his useless part back and is out no money (Net zero for transaction)
2) The buyer has no part, and is out $50 for shipping it back to the seller (net -$50)
How is that fair?
Wow, how do you sleep at night? There is no way that engine was running for a year with bearing caps in that shape.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Thomas.. Yes it may have been running, I will concede that, But it would not have run much longer.
Looking at the pics you posted, you can see the darker colors (circled in red) of heat build up on both the cam and the cam cap.


I didnt notice that when I first looked, and thought about buying this head.
once again
Looking at the pics you posted, you can see the darker colors (circled in red) of heat build up on both the cam and the cam cap.


I didnt notice that when I first looked, and thought about buying this head.
once again
Last edited by BogusSVO; Jul 12, 2012 at 03:24 PM.





