Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market

Bp4w Built motor: Track Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2017, 02:45 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
acedeuce802's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 1,218
Total Cats: 175
Default

The argument is valid that boost threshold becomes less important on track, if you are never below 3000 rpm at the slowest corner, then you don't care about boost below that. But spool and response is another aspect that the EFR/TSE will trump the FM setup, and that is absolutely critical. It'll help the motor feel more like a naturally aspirated motor, where pressing the accelerator is actually correlative to instant torque output.
acedeuce802 is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 05:28 PM
  #42  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Spool/response always matters on road courses. It could be that it's more an issue for advanced drivers who tend to apply throttle earlier to balance the car on entry and mid turn. Being able to modulate torque early in a turn without needing to fight a timing factor allows for higher min corner speeds.
Higher min corners speeds are generally what separate data traces from intermediate to advanced level drivers. Same terminal speeds, same exits speeds but the better driver enters fast and slows down less. Precise torque control is a key factor. So a turbo that responds more slowly is intrinsically at a disadvantage to a faster responding turbo.

Watch my video in Bullet at Buttonwillow posted here and elsewhere. Note how low I let the revs get. Note how I add maintenance throttle early in most turns. To get that level of response with a traditional Garrett would mean making less power. The world has changed. Take advantage of those changes or don't. That's a personal choice but no arguing that old stuff works as well as the new stuff.
Thanks. I'll watch it (again) and pay more attention to the revs.

Originally Posted by acedeuce802
The argument is valid that boost threshold becomes less important on track, if you are never below 3000 rpm at the slowest corner, then you don't care about boost below that. But spool and response is another aspect that the EFR/TSE will trump the FM setup, and that is absolutely critical. It'll help the motor feel more like a naturally aspirated motor, where pressing the accelerator is actually correlative to instant torque output.
Yeah, exactly my thinking. Once you're in the powerband... how does it affect things. It's a 2560. If you're at 3k or above you'll see boost before your foot hits the floor. The 2k spool test isn't really a realistic simulation for a track car.

If you want to behave like an NA car, then boost by TPS comes into play even more.

I'm not arguing that FM setup is better, as I'm pretty sure that it's not. I was just offering a counterpoint given that I've read a lot of folks on this thread say that it's not that important a consideration on track. Again, if the OP was after a bigger turbo than the 2560, I think it'd come into play in a much bigger way.

Then again, no real experience to back it up with....which is why I'm going and watching emilios video again.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 05:38 PM
  #43  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,660
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
It's a 2560. If you're at 3k or above you'll see boost before your foot hits the floor. The 2k spool test isn't really a realistic simulation for a track car.
I always thought if I was at WOT on the track at below 4k RPM then I should have downshifted.


Originally Posted by emilio700
Higher min corners speeds are generally what separate data traces from intermediate to advanced level drivers.
Mine are more like data scribbles.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 05:39 PM
  #44  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
I always thought if I was at WOT on the track at below 4k RPM then I should have downshifted.



Mine are more like data scribbles.
I was thinking of you when I wrote that tbh. lol.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 12-19-2017, 01:46 PM
  #45  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,100
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
Yeah, exactly my thinking. Once you're in the powerband... how does it affect things. It's a 2560. If you're at 3k or above you'll see boost before your foot hits the floor. The 2k spool test isn't really a realistic simulation for a track car.

If you want to behave like an NA car, then boost by TPS comes into play even more.

I'm not arguing that FM setup is better, as I'm pretty sure that it's not. I was just offering a counterpoint given that I've read a lot of folks on this thread say that it's not that important a consideration on track. Again, if the OP was after a bigger turbo than the 2560, I think it'd come into play in a much bigger way.
The difference between a 6258 and a 2560 with regard to transitional response is substantial. The 6258 is almost perfectly linear. The 2560 is decent, but nowhere near as good. As you get larger, comparing the 6758 to something like the GTX2867 or a GTX2871, it's not even a contest. The 6758 is in a different league compared to those larger Garretts. The EFR gains that transitional response advantage through its low-density (lightweight) turbine wheel, so as that wheel gets larger, the advantage gets bigger, but it's present even in the smaller sizes. The icing on the cake is that the 6258, while responding faster than a 2560R, will make another 50whp of efficient power given the same supporting modifications.

To get that NA-esque feel, especially with boost by TPS where you need to alter turbine speed multiple times as TPS increases, you need ultra-fast response from the turbo, which means making it as light as possible. The EFR has that ultra-fast response, the Garrett does not.
Savington is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Djwade
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
08-16-2020 06:34 PM
mighty mouse
Build Threads
751
06-27-2018 04:35 PM
blkmkiii
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
01-18-2018 12:48 PM
Alternative
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
03-28-2016 12:13 PM
2manyhobyz
WTB
3
12-23-2014 11:14 AM



Quick Reply: Bp4w Built motor: Track Build



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.