Bp4w Built motor: Track Build
#41
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 1,218
Total Cats: 175
The argument is valid that boost threshold becomes less important on track, if you are never below 3000 rpm at the slowest corner, then you don't care about boost below that. But spool and response is another aspect that the EFR/TSE will trump the FM setup, and that is absolutely critical. It'll help the motor feel more like a naturally aspirated motor, where pressing the accelerator is actually correlative to instant torque output.
#42
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Spool/response always matters on road courses. It could be that it's more an issue for advanced drivers who tend to apply throttle earlier to balance the car on entry and mid turn. Being able to modulate torque early in a turn without needing to fight a timing factor allows for higher min corner speeds.
Higher min corners speeds are generally what separate data traces from intermediate to advanced level drivers. Same terminal speeds, same exits speeds but the better driver enters fast and slows down less. Precise torque control is a key factor. So a turbo that responds more slowly is intrinsically at a disadvantage to a faster responding turbo.
Watch my video in Bullet at Buttonwillow posted here and elsewhere. Note how low I let the revs get. Note how I add maintenance throttle early in most turns. To get that level of response with a traditional Garrett would mean making less power. The world has changed. Take advantage of those changes or don't. That's a personal choice but no arguing that old stuff works as well as the new stuff.
Higher min corners speeds are generally what separate data traces from intermediate to advanced level drivers. Same terminal speeds, same exits speeds but the better driver enters fast and slows down less. Precise torque control is a key factor. So a turbo that responds more slowly is intrinsically at a disadvantage to a faster responding turbo.
Watch my video in Bullet at Buttonwillow posted here and elsewhere. Note how low I let the revs get. Note how I add maintenance throttle early in most turns. To get that level of response with a traditional Garrett would mean making less power. The world has changed. Take advantage of those changes or don't. That's a personal choice but no arguing that old stuff works as well as the new stuff.
The argument is valid that boost threshold becomes less important on track, if you are never below 3000 rpm at the slowest corner, then you don't care about boost below that. But spool and response is another aspect that the EFR/TSE will trump the FM setup, and that is absolutely critical. It'll help the motor feel more like a naturally aspirated motor, where pressing the accelerator is actually correlative to instant torque output.
If you want to behave like an NA car, then boost by TPS comes into play even more.
I'm not arguing that FM setup is better, as I'm pretty sure that it's not. I was just offering a counterpoint given that I've read a lot of folks on this thread say that it's not that important a consideration on track. Again, if the OP was after a bigger turbo than the 2560, I think it'd come into play in a much bigger way.
Then again, no real experience to back it up with....which is why I'm going and watching emilios video again.
#45
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,100
Yeah, exactly my thinking. Once you're in the powerband... how does it affect things. It's a 2560. If you're at 3k or above you'll see boost before your foot hits the floor. The 2k spool test isn't really a realistic simulation for a track car.
If you want to behave like an NA car, then boost by TPS comes into play even more.
I'm not arguing that FM setup is better, as I'm pretty sure that it's not. I was just offering a counterpoint given that I've read a lot of folks on this thread say that it's not that important a consideration on track. Again, if the OP was after a bigger turbo than the 2560, I think it'd come into play in a much bigger way.
If you want to behave like an NA car, then boost by TPS comes into play even more.
I'm not arguing that FM setup is better, as I'm pretty sure that it's not. I was just offering a counterpoint given that I've read a lot of folks on this thread say that it's not that important a consideration on track. Again, if the OP was after a bigger turbo than the 2560, I think it'd come into play in a much bigger way.
To get that NA-esque feel, especially with boost by TPS where you need to alter turbine speed multiple times as TPS increases, you need ultra-fast response from the turbo, which means making it as light as possible. The EFR has that ultra-fast response, the Garrett does not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Djwade
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
08-16-2020 06:34 PM
mighty mouse
Build Threads
751
06-27-2018 04:35 PM
blkmkiii
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
01-18-2018 12:48 PM
Alternative
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
03-28-2016 12:13 PM