Notices
Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Anyone with FI add a square top IM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2013 | 01:23 PM
  #21  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I'll definitely take you up on that when I'm good and ready
Thanks
Old Oct 17, 2013 | 02:02 PM
  #22  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
V: My offer still stands to loan you my spare VICS manifold when you get around to testing the VTCS vs Squaretop. I'd be nice to see all 3 on the same testbed with some 100kpa+ data
Originally Posted by 18psi
I'll definitely take you up on that when I'm good and ready
Thanks
This is part of the reason why I love mt.net, the fact that we will share parts just get testing done is great.

If we really want to go crazy depending on when 18PSI does his testing, I might be willing to offer up my BEGI cast manifold for use. Only issues I know off the top of my head would be a different TPS and idle valves.
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 10:40 AM
  #23  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
haha ok valid point

Exactly. I think most the street/daily driver VICS guys don't really even need this thing. Heck, even the VTCS guys don't really need one for the street (and one of the reasons I'm going to try using my vtcs mani at 1st and only switch to the squaretop if I'm unhappy with it). The track guys love this cause its OEM, bolts right up, and actually holds together unlike some of the honda mani's we've seen. And those running setups that make serious top end power obviously want it too because the stocker chokes up pretty dramatically (at least the vtcs does) past 300 or so.
I think you'll be fine with the VICS with a stockish redline. You can remember from my dyno more or less where the torque and hp start to tank, though my boost did taper down a tiny bit after peak power (because remember, I was making 10psi on a 7psi and not boost controller). It now ramps the boost up from 10psi @ 6500rpm to 12psi @ 7500 and the torque curve feels a lot flatter when you drive it. Assuming that taper actually held the torque flat thats about 300hp. I kind of feel like, yes the runners are kind of small and make a good deal of drag when you try to cram a lot of air in, but if you have the head room in the pressure department to support higher pressure you can more or less over come it. But I think the VICS will move your theoretical pressure vs flow plot vertical on the compressor map compared to the same engine with a flat top when trying to make the same amount of power.
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 10:49 AM
  #24  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Am i learning in this thread that the VCTS manifold sucks and i should gut the system?
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 08:52 PM
  #25  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Am i learning in this thread that the VCTS manifold sucks and i should gut the system?
No such thing as VCTS.

VICS = Variable Inertia Charging System = alters plenum volume and Helmholz frequency to improve midrange torque. Keep this, it's good.

VTCS = Variable Tumble Control System = improves intake charge tumble at low RPM/low CLTs to improve cold-start emissions. This is pure smog garbage, remove it at once.
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 09:17 PM
  #26  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Yeah, typo, my apologies.

I knew VICS was good. Had it on my Escort.

Never bothered to worry about VTCS, but I guess I may as well gut it this Spring before I get tuned for corm. What gains should I see removing it?
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 09:27 PM
  #27  
Amellrotts's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 675
Total Cats: 9
From: Hickory, NC
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
This is part of the reason why I love mt.net, the fact that we will share parts just get testing done is great.

If we really want to go crazy depending on when 18PSI does his testing, I might be willing to offer up my BEGI cast manifold for use. Only issues I know off the top of my head would be a different TPS and idle valves.
Lars,
I plan to do a test day soon, in about a month is my guess? I plan to test several intake manifolds on the same day. I would love to test your manifold as well, maybe you can come up? I will leave the car on the dyno and change manifolds before testing again in hopes of usable data. Maybe you will extend your offer to me as well?
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 11:35 PM
  #28  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

oh snap that would be awesome
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 07:45 AM
  #29  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Amellrotts
Lars,
I plan to do a test day soon, in about a month is my guess? I plan to test several intake manifolds on the same day. I would love to test your manifold as well, maybe you can come up? I will leave the car on the dyno and change manifolds before testing again in hopes of usable data. Maybe you will extend your offer to me as well?
you think they'll appreciate coolant all over their dyno?
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 08:29 AM
  #30  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
you think they'll appreciate coolant all over their dyno?
How does changing the IM release coolant? Well unless you're a ***** and still have the TB heat still hooked up.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 08:56 AM
  #31  
Amellrotts's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 675
Total Cats: 9
From: Hickory, NC
Default

I is such a ***** but see no reason it means I have to get coolant everywhere. I will have all my manifolds set to take the OEM TB and will use the 64mm Skunks TB so I will use the same TB for all the tests......at least that is my current plan.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 08:57 AM
  #32  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Amellrotts
I is such a ***** but see no reason it means I have to get coolant everywhere. I will have all my manifolds set to take the OEM TB and will use the 64mm Skunks TB so I will use the same TB for all the tests......at least that is my current plan.
The skunk doesnt have provisions for TB heat so you're all set.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 09:03 AM
  #33  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

oh is there no coolant port between the runners on the BPZ3?
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 09:09 AM
  #34  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
oh is there no coolant port between the runners on the BPZ3?
Not that I recall, I think thats a 1.6 thing.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 09:10 AM
  #35  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Not that I recall, I think thats a 1.6 thing.
1.6L is bossmode.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 10:00 AM
  #36  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

What about the fuel line routing? Doesn't that go between the runners?
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 10:02 AM
  #37  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
What about the fuel line routing? Doesn't that go between the runners?
I dont know how the stock NB routing goes, my M-Tuned routing both lines *** in from the rear.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 01:24 PM
  #38  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

The BP6D Chris will be running doesn't have any stupid coolant ports in the IM. And if he's smart he will already have looped the stupid TB coolant lines (or will do that prior to dyno time). Nothing else will prevent him from being able to carefully remove just the IM and nothing else and replace it. Been there done that.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 01:44 PM
  #39  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Amellrotts
Lars,
I plan to do a test day soon, in about a month is my guess? I plan to test several intake manifolds on the same day. I would love to test your manifold as well, maybe you can come up? I will leave the car on the dyno and change manifolds before testing again in hopes of usable data. Maybe you will extend your offer to me as well?
Shoot me a pm with info. Depending on when it is I might be interested in heading up to NC to help.
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 02:10 PM
  #40  
TorqueZombie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,656
Total Cats: 64
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

I know with my square top I had to hog it out to match the Skunk TB. The size difference is pretty noticeable.



I have one square top gasket matched to the Skunk TB/ports and one that is left alone. If you want a hand, or another manifold(s) to play with hit me up. Depending on schedules I might make the trip over your way. Wife will probably send me with food as well. Can't do dyno on empty stomachs.
Attached Thumbnails Anyone with FI add a square top IM?-gqeoxsi.jpg  



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM.