NASA ST6/TT6
#82
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
From Greg G: "I spoke with the NASA Exec's this past weekend, and it was decided that there will be specific eligibility exceptions in ST6/TT6 for certain vehicles, with the HP and Displacement caps remaining as written otherwise. At this time, the vehicles that are going to fall under this exception will be the 2.5L 944's and E30 325 BMW's."
**** yeah! They should remove the displacement rule entirely, but this is better than nothing!
**** yeah! They should remove the displacement rule entirely, but this is better than nothing!
#83
Was just coming to post that. They're obviously trying to nerf some OP builds before they happen with the displacement / power cap.
What doward said. I'm running the same TTE* reclass as Arca (2430lbs / 136whp) on my 97, but use SM7's to make room for ELBJ's. The * reclass is next best thing to points build, just gotta get used to 1000lbs springs with stock sways. That's also one reason I would't be worried about 40lbs in the least if going ST6, getting sways back would make up for it I think.
What doward said. I'm running the same TTE* reclass as Arca (2430lbs / 136whp) on my 97, but use SM7's to make room for ELBJ's. The * reclass is next best thing to points build, just gotta get used to 1000lbs springs with stock sways. That's also one reason I would't be worried about 40lbs in the least if going ST6, getting sways back would make up for it I think.
#86
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
I've got an atypical points build for E, I actually have sways/header/intake, just no ECU. I would like to do ECU and 6spd before first event ST6 of 2019..... which is January 19/20 at Roebling for me However, I don't think I can swing both and I believe the ECU is lower hanging fruit. It will allow me to detune much easier if need be..... I think?
Since I'll be right on the edge of the ratio, I suspect I'll pop the dyno a couple of times..... but at least the dyno in the South East has been pretty consistent and not too far off other dynojets.
Since I'll be right on the edge of the ratio, I suspect I'll pop the dyno a couple of times..... but at least the dyno in the South East has been pretty consistent and not too far off other dynojets.
#88
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
I should add, I'm already at 133 avg/137 peak, so I'll need to be 2490 or 2500 for a small buffer. My typical comp weight is the base 2410lbs for E, but usually 2420lbs for safety and depending on scales. Dan weighed 2440lbs at ViR in my car earlier this year with fuel/ballast at 2410 on my typical scales. That's with me in it and I'm ~20lbs heavier than Dan. Talking to the choir here I suppose.
6spd is cheaper too...... I like that part. Need to hawk the forums for a MR 6spd shifter too!
#91
It's official. We're building an ST6 car. We'll start a new thread for it here in a few days. Sonny (our warehouse manager) is the owner and he will be doing the bulk of the work. Dan and Sonny will share driving duties. One key difference from past NASA race cars is that
we will be disclosing every last detail of the build in real time. Maybe someone will keep up with our development and beat us with our own formula. We're ok with that. Our goal is simply to keep the NA/NB at the front of the ST6/TT6 field with
a focused development program. And yes, it will go to Mid-O
we will be disclosing every last detail of the build in real time. Maybe someone will keep up with our development and beat us with our own formula. We're ok with that. Our goal is simply to keep the NA/NB at the front of the ST6/TT6 field with
a focused development program. And yes, it will go to Mid-O
__________________
Last edited by emilio700; 10-24-2018 at 10:25 PM. Reason: spelig
#98
edit.
As long as we know these aren't official, I don't mind sharing.
205 R7 on 9" = 230mm @23mm.
205 SM7 on 9" = 236mm @ 30mm (FatKao)(My R7 was within 1mm at 30mm)
245 RC1 on 10”: 249mm @23mm. 254@30mm
245 Rival S on 9”: 242@23mm. 249@30mm
225 Sur4g on 9”: 228@23mm. 231@30mm.
225 RC1 on 9”: 225@23mm. 230@30mm.
205 R7 on 8 = 226mm @23mm. Meets “equal to” rule.
205 RR on 8 = 210mm@30mm (FatKao)
205 RE71R on 8”: 208@23mm
205 VR1 on 8”: 218@23mm
205 R7 on 9" = 230mm @23mm.
205 SM7 on 9" = 236mm @ 30mm (FatKao)(My R7 was within 1mm at 30mm)
245 RC1 on 10”: 249mm @23mm. 254@30mm
245 Rival S on 9”: 242@23mm. 249@30mm
225 Sur4g on 9”: 228@23mm. 231@30mm.
225 RC1 on 9”: 225@23mm. 230@30mm.
205 R7 on 8 = 226mm @23mm. Meets “equal to” rule.
205 RR on 8 = 210mm@30mm (FatKao)
205 RE71R on 8”: 208@23mm
205 VR1 on 8”: 218@23mm
Last edited by blkmkiii; 11-01-2018 at 09:44 PM.
#100
edit
As long as we know these aren't official, I don't mind sharing.
205 R7 on 9" = 230mm @23mm.
205 SM7 on 9" = 236mm @ 30mm (FatKao)(My R7 was within 1mm at 30mm)
245 RC1 on 10”: 249mm @23mm. 254@30mm
245 Rival S on 9”: 242@23mm. 249@30mm
225 Sur4g on 9”: 228@23mm. 231@30mm.
225 RC1 on 9”: 225@23mm. 230@30mm.
205 R7 on 8 = 226mm @23mm. Meets “equal to” rule.
205 RR on 8 = 210mm@30mm (FatKao)
205 RE71R on 8”: 208@23mm
205 VR1 on 8”: 218@23mm
205 R7 on 9" = 230mm @23mm.
205 SM7 on 9" = 236mm @ 30mm (FatKao)(My R7 was within 1mm at 30mm)
245 RC1 on 10”: 249mm @23mm. 254@30mm
245 Rival S on 9”: 242@23mm. 249@30mm
225 Sur4g on 9”: 228@23mm. 231@30mm.
225 RC1 on 9”: 225@23mm. 230@30mm.
205 R7 on 8 = 226mm @23mm. Meets “equal to” rule.
205 RR on 8 = 210mm@30mm (FatKao)
205 RE71R on 8”: 208@23mm
205 VR1 on 8”: 218@23mm
Last edited by blkmkiii; 11-01-2018 at 09:44 PM.