Notices
Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Roll cage for TT - options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 09:19 AM
  #21  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

We running two nets on our Champ/Chump Car. We also have roof nets under our bolted on roof panel. Better safe than sorry. They don't weight much and we don't have to run arm restraints.
Old Oct 29, 2018 | 05:54 PM
  #22  
fmcokc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 50
From: Oklahoma City
Default

I have been looking at rules for FIA roll cages. It appears that they spec 1.75" x .095 tubing for the main components of the cage and allow for 1.50" x .095 for the support bars such as a the backstays, diagonals and doorbars.
Am I reading that correctly? I haven't found any that specify tubing size by the weight of the car like some organizations do.
Old Oct 29, 2018 | 06:30 PM
  #23  
doward's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,608
Total Cats: 817
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by fmcokc
I have been looking at rules for FIA roll cages. It appears that they spec 1.75" x .095 tubing for the main components of the cage and allow for 1.50" x .095 for the support bars such as a the backstays, diagonals and doorbars.
Am I reading that correctly? I haven't found any that specify tubing size by the weight of the car like some organizations do.
NASA is pretty specific... "Required" tubes have a min spec. Optional tubes are optional, with no min spec.
Up to 1500 lbs 1.375” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) 1.500” x 0.080” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) RACING AND COMPETITION 47
1501 - 2500 lbs 1.500” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) 1.500” x 0.120” ERW* (No issuance of log books for cars with ERW cages) *Note- Specifications listed only for reference for inspection of grandfathered vehicles.
2501 - 3000 lbs 1.500” x 0.120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) 1.750” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) 1.750” x 0.120” ERW* (No issuance of log books for cars with ERW cages) *Note- Specifications listed only for reference for inspection of grandfathered vehicles.
3001 - 4000 lbs 1.750” x .120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) No ERW allowed. Over 4000 lbs 2.000” x 0.120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical), DOM, or Docol R8 (only) No ERW allowed.

I'm sure SCCA and other commonly-referenced rulebooks are similar.


The references above to "FIA" spec are mainly the use of IMSA style pyramid or 3D X doorbars and the A pillar reinforcement tubes.
Old Oct 29, 2018 | 06:43 PM
  #24  
Blackbird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Make sure that your local tech will accept the cage prior to building true FIA spec cage.
There are a few major changes in the line of thought between FIA and all US organizations.
Old Oct 29, 2018 | 09:33 PM
  #25  
fmcokc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 50
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird
Make sure that your local tech will accept the cage prior to building true FIA spec cage.
There are a few major changes in the line of thought between FIA and all US organizations.

yes, some of their configurations are a bit different.
Old Oct 29, 2018 | 09:43 PM
  #26  
fmcokc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 50
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Originally Posted by doward
I'm sure SCCA and other commonly-referenced rulebooks are similar.


The references above to "FIA" spec are mainly the use of IMSA style pyramid or 3D X doorbars and the A pillar reinforcement tubes.

Yes, all the org’s I have seen specify the size of the tubing based on the weight of the car. I find it odd that the FIA only gives 1 spec for tubing size that I can find.

What at is the general thought/ consensus on the additional A pillar reinforcement bars and the pyramid x shaped door bars? Are they considered as strong or stronger than the NASCAR style bars?
Old Oct 29, 2018 | 09:52 PM
  #27  
afm's Avatar
afm
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 985
Total Cats: 510
From: Berkeley, CA
Default

Originally Posted by fmcokc



Yes, all the org’s I have seen specify the size of the tubing based on the weight of the car. I find it odd that the FIA only gives 1 spec for tubing size that I can find.

What at is the general thought/ consensus on the additional A pillar reinforcement bars and the pyramid x shaped door bars? Are they considered as strong or stronger than the NASCAR style bars?
Pyramid door bars are stronger, since they are triangulated and lack unsupported bends. NASCAR bars are easy to package and execute, and make it simple to have easy ingress/egress (larger / older / less flexible people). That's why totally optimized pyramid bars are mostly featured on more "high-effort" cages.
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 07:19 AM
  #28  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird
Make sure that your local tech will accept the cage prior to building true FIA spec cage.
There are a few major changes in the line of thought between FIA and all US organizations.
To further that point, make sure they will accept an FIA cage that hasn't been homologated if you plan on taking any creative liberties with it!
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 11:13 AM
  #29  
Blackbird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Originally Posted by fmcokc
What at is the general thought/ consensus on the additional A pillar reinforcement bars and the pyramid x shaped door bars? Are they considered as strong or stronger than the NASCAR style bars?
I built Morpheus with pyramid X door bars and additional front reinforcement.
Keep in mind that FIA bars take a massive amount of room from the door opening and that might not work for many drivers for quick exit purposes.
To avoid that issue in Morpheus, I replaced the tubes with a 3D curved gusset which is a great way to spend 20+ hours fabricating one piece of sheet metal, even if you're well versed at this -


Old Oct 30, 2018 | 11:20 AM
  #30  
fmcokc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 206
Total Cats: 50
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
As Andrew observed, if you are not otherwise limited by rules, go big. Traditional Spec Miata cages are floor mounted only. They provided only the minimal roll over and intrusion protection. Beyond that, they offer only the minimal amount of torsional stiffness increase compared to a fully integrated cage. NASA ST rules allow almost a full FIA cage in ST5. In Supermiata, we are adopting more open rules for cages even in S2 (140whp). S1 goes a step further by allowing a full integrated FIA cage with extensions to the front shock mounts. The merits of a 12+ pt cage attached to the firewall and door jambs go far beyond mere intrusion protection but that should be enough. In most cases, the cost and weight only increase slightly and the car is future proof for additional power/grip/ aero loads.
Do you have any details/pics of the extensions to the front shock mounts? Would like to see what you or others are doing in this area.
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 11:32 AM
  #31  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by fmcokc


Do you have any details/pics of the extensions to the front shock mounts? Would like to see what you or others are doing in this area.




Go go to the build thread for Vegas. But ultimately it is simple, you are looking for a straight path from the strongest part of the door hoop and dash bar interface to the shock tower. The dash bar is generally a bit too high to the line up with the top of the shock tower so you end up taking it from a point a little bit lower. So thinking ahead means you build your door bars to intersect at roughly the point where you take your extension through the firewall.

Additionally is important to remember that the Miata is not a strut car so the actual shock tower doesn't have that much load going through it. The highest forces are going into the subframe mounts which are those two big studs that poke out the bottom of the frame rail. Those forces are trying to twist the front of the car and deflect the frame rails out of the same plane. So that's really what you are trying to reinforce, box or triangulate. Triangulation preferred as it uses a lot less material than a box, for a given stiffness.

From a safety standpoint it is intrusion. Like most small cars keeping the front wheel and suspension out of the driver's footwell in a major frontal impact is a challenge. A simple triangulated brace anchored at the door bar foot and a little higher up and extending forward to the stiffest part of the firewall helps hugely in this regard.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
falcon
Race Prep
87
Oct 8, 2011 12:52 AM
Tony~
Race Prep
17
Feb 25, 2011 08:39 PM
m2cupcar
Miata parts for sale/trade
23
Mar 21, 2010 07:43 PM
big jim
Race Prep
10
Mar 2, 2010 11:25 PM
UrbanSoot
General Miata Chat
66
May 1, 2009 01:48 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM.