so I spent the day getting my ass beat by a car with AFCO and street rubber
02-22-2010, 01:02 PM
#21
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
The steering feel is phenominal and regular tracks like TWS, but add the "bumps" or mogals as i refer to them, and it becomes a workout.
I did the FM style depower w/ plugs from miataroadster and couldnt be happier...till the mogals appeared. thankfully I do not run HHR often, that was my first day at actual speed. I had done a few parade laps before.
I did the FM style depower w/ plugs from miataroadster and couldnt be happier...till the mogals appeared. thankfully I do not run HHR often, that was my first day at actual speed. I had done a few parade laps before.
So HHR is already getting that rough? Damn...
Since you mentioned it, how is your steering control on the front straight transistions at TWS?
Reply
0
0
02-22-2010, 01:32 PM
#22
Hustler,
Borrow someones data logger before you start changing stuff! Curious what kind of steady state cornering g's you are achieving. Would be great to see befores and afters when you start fiddling with ride height, spring rates, alignment, etc.
949's alignment numbers are a great starting place too.
Borrow someones data logger before you start changing stuff! Curious what kind of steady state cornering g's you are achieving. Would be great to see befores and afters when you start fiddling with ride height, spring rates, alignment, etc.
949's alignment numbers are a great starting place too.
Reply
0
0
02-22-2010, 01:53 PM
#25
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Yeak OK so you know the basic tradeoff then. More camber = better feel but more steering effort. I like the feel of 4* myself, FM style depowered rack.
So HHR is already getting that rough? Damn...
Since you mentioned it, how is your steering control on the front straight transistions at TWS?
So HHR is already getting that rough? Damn...
Since you mentioned it, how is your steering control on the front straight transistions at TWS?
Reply
0
0
02-22-2010, 01:54 PM
#26
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Hustler,
Borrow someones data logger before you start changing stuff! Curious what kind of steady state cornering g's you are achieving. Would be great to see befores and afters when you start fiddling with ride height, spring rates, alignment, etc.
949's alignment numbers are a great starting place too.
Borrow someones data logger before you start changing stuff! Curious what kind of steady state cornering g's you are achieving. Would be great to see befores and afters when you start fiddling with ride height, spring rates, alignment, etc.
949's alignment numbers are a great starting place too.
Reply
0
0
02-22-2010, 01:56 PM
#27
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX / Lafayette, LA
Posts: 272
Total Cats: 3
I'm running the middle setting on my FM 5/8" rear bar. The car is neutral on the slightly loose side and easy to throttle steer. IIRC according to the fatcat spreadsheet, my spring rates are slightly front biased, I like to be able to tweak the balance as needed with the rear bar. For example in the wet i should soften the rear bar, if i had selected my spring rates so that i didnt need a rear bar, my only option would be to stiffen the front, when generally you want to soften everything.
Honestly HHR is the only track that I have noticed any bump steer. I'm not sure when you were there, but the bumps are pretty bad. Goin CCW, in the kink, turn 6 i think, i would get wheel spin at the top of a bump at the apex and also put the tire into the top of the wheelwell at the bottom of the bump. I have a 2x4" shiney spot to prove it.
I'll put up some video, it should show how bumpy is is.
I take a pretty low line into turn 1 at TWS, partly because I run out of gear. I do not have any problems at TWS in terms of bump steer. Dont get me wrong, there is some bump steer, but its not bad enough for me to complain about it. you can kinda see the steering wheel in this video
Honestly HHR is the only track that I have noticed any bump steer. I'm not sure when you were there, but the bumps are pretty bad. Goin CCW, in the kink, turn 6 i think, i would get wheel spin at the top of a bump at the apex and also put the tire into the top of the wheelwell at the bottom of the bump. I have a 2x4" shiney spot to prove it.
I'll put up some video, it should show how bumpy is is.
I take a pretty low line into turn 1 at TWS, partly because I run out of gear. I do not have any problems at TWS in terms of bump steer. Dont get me wrong, there is some bump steer, but its not bad enough for me to complain about it. you can kinda see the steering wheel in this video
Reply
0
0
02-22-2010, 02:17 PM
#28
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Yeah OK that line lessens the transitions so I see your point. Still your bumpsteer does not look too bad from what I can tell. If you are hitting that bump at the inside of T5 it is not bad at all. It seems like your line took you over the bump but I did not see any movement. Looks like that first lap was a ~2:00 not too shabby from what I understand.
Though I have done hundreds and hundreds of laps at TWS on a bike (not exaggerating here) I have still not been on HHR. So is it accel/deaccel ripples, or the track settling, or both? Same thing happened at Houston. I made a bike track day there right after it opened and the surface was a freaking dream. Now, not so nice.
Though I have done hundreds and hundreds of laps at TWS on a bike (not exaggerating here) I have still not been on HHR. So is it accel/deaccel ripples, or the track settling, or both? Same thing happened at Houston. I made a bike track day there right after it opened and the surface was a freaking dream. Now, not so nice.
Reply
0
0
02-22-2010, 06:33 PM
#35
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX / Lafayette, LA
Posts: 272
Total Cats: 3
1.4g sustained on NT01's. I only have 1 weekend on the NT01's on 15x9's so i wasnt pushing the tires all that much, I know theres more grip in them cause i never found the limit.
Reply
0
0
02-23-2010, 02:40 AM
#36
The RS3's amazed me too the first time we ran them on 9's. Shockingly fast for a "street" tire.
________________
Hustler, keep a 12mm rear bar off the 1.6's. Don't listen to the guys running no rear bar. The better your shocks are, the more rear bar you can run, the harder it will turn. All the fast SoCal cars are running the 14mm rear bar off the MSM. With softer springs or shorter stroke shocks, the 12mm NA6 bar and a either the fat FM or 1.125 RB hollow will work.
__________________
Reply
0
0
02-23-2010, 08:45 AM
#38
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
That's about what we see with those tires too with a slightly lightened car.
The RS3's amazed me too the first time we ran them on 9's. Shockingly fast for a "street" tire.
________________
Hustler, keep a 12mm rear bar off the 1.6's. Don't listen to the guys running no rear bar. The better your shocks are, the more rear bar you can run, the harder it will turn. All the fast SoCal cars are running the 14mm rear bar off the MSM. With softer springs or shorter stroke shocks, the 12mm NA6 bar and a either the fat FM or 1.125 RB hollow will work.
The RS3's amazed me too the first time we ran them on 9's. Shockingly fast for a "street" tire.
________________
Hustler, keep a 12mm rear bar off the 1.6's. Don't listen to the guys running no rear bar. The better your shocks are, the more rear bar you can run, the harder it will turn. All the fast SoCal cars are running the 14mm rear bar off the MSM. With softer springs or shorter stroke shocks, the 12mm NA6 bar and a either the fat FM or 1.125 RB hollow will work.
Reply
0
0
02-23-2010, 11:15 AM
#39
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX / Lafayette, LA
Posts: 272
Total Cats: 3
Sorry I didn't see you question about the damper settings. I'll have to check this weekend. I'm pretty happy with my current settings, but I'm still tweeking.
Reply
0
0
