M45 w/megasquirt dyno sheet/video
04-14-2012, 08:44 AM
#1
M45 w/megasquirt dyno sheet/video
Hi,
I just got a megasquirt installed to go with my M45 and took it to the dyno for some fine tuning and dyno numbers.
Just wanted to share my numbers. The video pretty much says it all...
Feel free to ask if u got any questions...
143HP AND 133 TQ
VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=Ph0hwSdXSO8
I just got a megasquirt installed to go with my M45 and took it to the dyno for some fine tuning and dyno numbers.
Just wanted to share my numbers. The video pretty much says it all...
Feel free to ask if u got any questions...
143HP AND 133 TQ
VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=Ph0hwSdXSO8
Reply
0
0
04-14-2012, 01:49 PM
#5
Man, your car looks a LOT like mine.
That's a great torque curve for DD and autox.
I was always worried about adding the load of a SC to the small-nose crankshaft. One of the main reasons I went turbo. Do you still have a small-nose, or have you moved on from that issue?
Ever make it up to MSR-C? I'd love to see your car.
That's a great torque curve for DD and autox.
I was always worried about adding the load of a SC to the small-nose crankshaft. One of the main reasons I went turbo. Do you still have a small-nose, or have you moved on from that issue?
Ever make it up to MSR-C? I'd love to see your car.
Reply
0
0
04-15-2012, 12:27 PM
#6
thank you!
Yes i know not a big bump in power but enough for my needs for now, its a blast to drive, instant power mid corner on demand 
Small-nose crank still there... im sure there are tons of info on how to "deal" with this problem but if u could narrow it down to one option what would it be to "fix" this? i kinda have the mentality that if it goes i'll just get a 1.8...
And no i havent gone to MSR, ive wanted to go though...
and thanks
This is the latest pics i have until i can detail it and take some proper pics:
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2011-11-17
Man, your car looks a LOT like mine.
That's a great torque curve for DD and autox.
I was always worried about adding the load of a SC to the small-nose crankshaft. One of the main reasons I went turbo. Do you still have a small-nose, or have you moved on from that issue?
Ever make it up to MSR-C? I'd love to see your car.
That's a great torque curve for DD and autox.
I was always worried about adding the load of a SC to the small-nose crankshaft. One of the main reasons I went turbo. Do you still have a small-nose, or have you moved on from that issue?
Ever make it up to MSR-C? I'd love to see your car.
And no i havent gone to MSR, ive wanted to go though...
and thanks
This is the latest pics i have until i can detail it and take some proper pics:
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2012-04-15
By oscargarza88 at 2011-11-17
Reply
0
0
05-17-2012, 01:35 AM
#13
Thanks
I used the MR 300 Raydot Mirror. I would look a little harder if done all over again since once you tighten these you cant adjust them. So u kinda have to get it right the first time.
Reply
0
0
05-28-2012, 02:51 PM
#14
I also have a 1.6 with the M45 blower (Silverstone as well 
) Mine made 140 hp with AFPR and JR Boost/Timing retard unit. Granted, the Dynodynamics dynamometer is said to read 10%~15% lower than a Dynojet.
The charts show the before and after the supercharger installation.
I want to go with the MSpnp to see what I can get powerwise and to optimize my fuel delivery/use.
I know that I'm going to have to get injectors and I was looking at the Mazda #195500-2150, 326cc (Probe turbo/B2600 truck) injectors. I found some in the used parts for as little a $50 but who knows if they are the right ones? I found a website where they can be purchased for $253 (reconditioned). I don't know if this is a good idea or not.
I would love to hear some suggestions or ideas about this too....
) Mine made 140 hp with AFPR and JR Boost/Timing retard unit. Granted, the Dynodynamics dynamometer is said to read 10%~15% lower than a Dynojet.The charts show the before and after the supercharger installation.
I want to go with the MSpnp to see what I can get powerwise and to optimize my fuel delivery/use.
I know that I'm going to have to get injectors and I was looking at the Mazda #195500-2150, 326cc (Probe turbo/B2600 truck) injectors. I found some in the used parts for as little a $50 but who knows if they are the right ones? I found a website where they can be purchased for $253 (reconditioned). I don't know if this is a good idea or not.
I would love to hear some suggestions or ideas about this too....
Reply
0
0
05-29-2012, 09:25 AM
#17
I also have a 1.6 with the M45 blower (Silverstone as well ) Mine made 140 hp with AFPR and JR Boost/Timing retard unit. Granted, the Dynodynamics dynamometer is said to read 10%~15% lower than a Dynojet.
The charts show the before and after the supercharger installation.
I want to go with the MSpnp to see what I can get powerwise and to optimize my fuel delivery/use.
I know that I'm going to have to get injectors and I was looking at the Mazda #195500-2150, 326cc (Probe turbo/B2600 truck) injectors. I found some in the used parts for as little a $50 but who knows if they are the right ones? I found a website where they can be purchased for $253 (reconditioned). I don't know if this is a good idea or not.
I would love to hear some suggestions or ideas about this too....
) Mine made 140 hp with AFPR and JR Boost/Timing retard unit. Granted, the Dynodynamics dynamometer is said to read 10%~15% lower than a Dynojet.The charts show the before and after the supercharger installation.
I want to go with the MSpnp to see what I can get powerwise and to optimize my fuel delivery/use.
I know that I'm going to have to get injectors and I was looking at the Mazda #195500-2150, 326cc (Probe turbo/B2600 truck) injectors. I found some in the used parts for as little a $50 but who knows if they are the right ones? I found a website where they can be purchased for $253 (reconditioned). I don't know if this is a good idea or not.
I would love to hear some suggestions or ideas about this too....
And yes, thats the main reason why i went with the MS, not as much to get more power but just to keep the SC under full control an not have to worry about engine mismanagement or knocking, which in the heat it did alot of...
I thought my injectors were pretty much 100% duty cycle, i didnt know they could handle more psi.
Next step for me down the road after i mess with suspension is to do fuel pump, injectors and then be able to add a smaller pulley to get around 10psi mark, im really happy with the amount of power right now though, it will do for a while.
Reply
0
0
05-29-2012, 09:44 AM
#18
Thanks for the compliment Oscar. Those side skirts are from RSpeed and I like them a lot.
I'm running stock 1.8 injectors. They are 15% larger than the stock 1.6 injectors. Also, I am running the AFPR which allows them to run a lot more fuel. At 96 psi and 6 lb of boost they will deliver 396cc. Take a look at this link. Now, if you are not running larger injectors or an AFPR with your system, you cannot make very much power and risk engine damage. Do you have an AFPR?
If you do not have an AFPR you must hurry and get some 320cc injectors. Don't worry about the fuel pump. The stock pump is quite sufficient for the HP you will make. This explains why your power output is modest from a intercooled SC with MS ems.... I would expect to see around 160 whp or better from a car like yours (unless the dyno reads very low)
I'm running stock 1.8 injectors. They are 15% larger than the stock 1.6 injectors. Also, I am running the AFPR which allows them to run a lot more fuel. At 96 psi and 6 lb of boost they will deliver 396cc. Take a look at this link. Now, if you are not running larger injectors or an AFPR with your system, you cannot make very much power and risk engine damage. Do you have an AFPR?
If you do not have an AFPR you must hurry and get some 320cc injectors. Don't worry about the fuel pump. The stock pump is quite sufficient for the HP you will make. This explains why your power output is modest from a intercooled SC with MS ems.... I would expect to see around 160 whp or better from a car like yours (unless the dyno reads very low)
Reply
0
0
05-29-2012, 09:54 AM
#19
Thanks for the compliment Oscar. Those side skirts are from RSpeed and I like them a lot.
I'm running stock 1.8 injectors. They are 15% larger than the stock 1.6 injectors. Also, I am running the AFPR which allows them to run a lot more fuel. At 96 psi and 6 lb of boost they will deliver 396cc. Take a look at this link. Now, if you are not running larger injectors or an AFPR with your system, you cannot make very much power and risk engine damage. Do you have an AFPR?
If you do not have an AFPR you must hurry and get some 320cc injectors. Don't worry about the fuel pump. The stock pump is quite sufficient for the HP you will make. This explains why your power output is modest from a intercooled SC with MS ems.... I would expect to see around 160 whp or better from a car like yours (unless the dyno reads very low)
I'm running stock 1.8 injectors. They are 15% larger than the stock 1.6 injectors. Also, I am running the AFPR which allows them to run a lot more fuel. At 96 psi and 6 lb of boost they will deliver 396cc. Take a look at this link. Now, if you are not running larger injectors or an AFPR with your system, you cannot make very much power and risk engine damage. Do you have an AFPR?
If you do not have an AFPR you must hurry and get some 320cc injectors. Don't worry about the fuel pump. The stock pump is quite sufficient for the HP you will make. This explains why your power output is modest from a intercooled SC with MS ems.... I would expect to see around 160 whp or better from a car like yours (unless the dyno reads very low)
I do have a AFPR, its a BEGI unit which is a old one and came with the car, but it works good enough i think.
What are your afr's at WOT? seems like mine could be leaned out a bit more to get more power, im averaging 12 at wot.
Reply
0
0
05-29-2012, 10:39 AM
#20
I thought about going with 1.8 injectors but figured if im going to upgrade might as well upgrade once and get bigger ones.
I do have a AFPR, its a BEGI unit which is a old one and came with the car, but it works good enough i think.
What are your afr's at WOT? seems like mine could be leaned out a bit more to get more power, im averaging 12 at wot.
I do have a AFPR, its a BEGI unit which is a old one and came with the car, but it works good enough i think.
What are your afr's at WOT? seems like mine could be leaned out a bit more to get more power, im averaging 12 at wot.
A/Fs in the 12's is supposed to be pretty good from what I hear, but I don't know enough to opine intelligently.
Do not waste time and money with 1.8 injectors since you have the MS. Just go with 320cc and ditch the AFPR
Reply
0
0
